学术牙科诊所报告口干症患者的药物使用。

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of Pharmacy Technology Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1177/87551225221108599
Michael P Krajewski, QingXiang Mo, Chi-Hua Lu, Albert Cantos, Steve Feuerstein, Michael J Brandt, Robert G Wahler
{"title":"学术牙科诊所报告口干症患者的药物使用。","authors":"Michael P Krajewski,&nbsp;QingXiang Mo,&nbsp;Chi-Hua Lu,&nbsp;Albert Cantos,&nbsp;Steve Feuerstein,&nbsp;Michael J Brandt,&nbsp;Robert G Wahler","doi":"10.1177/87551225221108599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Global prevalence of xerostomia has been reported at 22% (range 0.01%-45%), negatively impacting oral health, nutrition intake, and quality of life. The causal relationship between xerostomia and medications remains uncertain but greater understanding could guide interventions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the demographic characteristics and medication regimens in patients with xerostomia of an academic dental clinic.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This is a retrospective academic dental clinic record review from July 1, 2018 to October 27, 2020. Patient records were obtained from the University at Buffalo, School of Dental Medicine. Xerostomia status was determined via query of electronic health records and validated by manual review. Pharmacologic class and xerostomic potential of medications were identified by the Veterans Affairs Drug Classification System and drug compendia, respectively. Predictors of medication use were assessed using a multiple logistic regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 37 403 examined records, 366 (0.98%) were identified as xerostomic. After excluding confounding factors (Sjogren's and radiation), 275 of 317 patients received at least one xerostomic medication, majority were female (240, 66%) versus male (126, 34%). Mean ± (SD) age was 64.9 ± 15.11 years. A total of 208 (57%) patients were aged ≥65. The median number of total and xerostomic medications were 8 (interquartile range [IQR], 4-12) and 4 (IQR, 2-7), respectively. The 3 most prevalent xerostomic pharmacologic classes were antidepressants (131, 35%), gastric medications (101, 28%), and vitamin D (87, 24%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite observed prevalence of xerostomia lower than global prevalence, xerostomic medication burden for patients experiencing xerostomia was high. Pharmacist-led interprofessional collaborations should be investigated to reduce xerostomic burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9420921/pdf/10.1177_87551225221108599.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medication Use Among Patients Reporting Xerostomia of an Academic Dental Clinic.\",\"authors\":\"Michael P Krajewski,&nbsp;QingXiang Mo,&nbsp;Chi-Hua Lu,&nbsp;Albert Cantos,&nbsp;Steve Feuerstein,&nbsp;Michael J Brandt,&nbsp;Robert G Wahler\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/87551225221108599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Global prevalence of xerostomia has been reported at 22% (range 0.01%-45%), negatively impacting oral health, nutrition intake, and quality of life. The causal relationship between xerostomia and medications remains uncertain but greater understanding could guide interventions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the demographic characteristics and medication regimens in patients with xerostomia of an academic dental clinic.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This is a retrospective academic dental clinic record review from July 1, 2018 to October 27, 2020. Patient records were obtained from the University at Buffalo, School of Dental Medicine. Xerostomia status was determined via query of electronic health records and validated by manual review. Pharmacologic class and xerostomic potential of medications were identified by the Veterans Affairs Drug Classification System and drug compendia, respectively. Predictors of medication use were assessed using a multiple logistic regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 37 403 examined records, 366 (0.98%) were identified as xerostomic. After excluding confounding factors (Sjogren's and radiation), 275 of 317 patients received at least one xerostomic medication, majority were female (240, 66%) versus male (126, 34%). Mean ± (SD) age was 64.9 ± 15.11 years. A total of 208 (57%) patients were aged ≥65. The median number of total and xerostomic medications were 8 (interquartile range [IQR], 4-12) and 4 (IQR, 2-7), respectively. The 3 most prevalent xerostomic pharmacologic classes were antidepressants (131, 35%), gastric medications (101, 28%), and vitamin D (87, 24%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite observed prevalence of xerostomia lower than global prevalence, xerostomic medication burden for patients experiencing xerostomia was high. Pharmacist-led interprofessional collaborations should be investigated to reduce xerostomic burden.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9420921/pdf/10.1177_87551225221108599.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225221108599\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225221108599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:据报道,全球口干症患病率为22%(范围0.01%-45%),对口腔健康、营养摄入和生活质量产生负面影响。口干症和药物之间的因果关系仍不确定,但更多的了解可以指导干预。目的:介绍某学术牙科诊所口干症患者的人口学特征和用药方案。方法:回顾性分析2018年7月1日至2020年10月27日牙科临床学术记录。患者记录来自布法罗大学牙科医学院。通过查询电子健康记录来确定口干状态,并通过人工审查来验证。药物的药理分类和口腔干燥潜力分别由退伍军人事务药物分类系统和药物纲要确定。使用多元逻辑回归模型评估药物使用的预测因素。结果:37 403例病例中,366例(0.98%)为口干性。在排除混杂因素(干燥症和放疗)后,317例患者中有275例接受了至少一种口干药物治疗,其中大多数为女性(240,66%)与男性(126,34%)。平均±(SD)年龄为64.9±15.11岁。共有208例(57%)患者年龄≥65岁。总药物和干口药物的中位数分别为8(四分位数范围[IQR], 4-12)和4 (IQR, 2-7)。3种最常见的口干药物类别是抗抑郁药(131,35%)、胃药(101,28%)和维生素D(87, 24%)。结论:尽管观察到的口干症患病率低于全球患病率,但口干症患者的口干药物负担很高。应研究药剂师主导的跨专业合作,以减轻口干负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Medication Use Among Patients Reporting Xerostomia of an Academic Dental Clinic.

Background: Global prevalence of xerostomia has been reported at 22% (range 0.01%-45%), negatively impacting oral health, nutrition intake, and quality of life. The causal relationship between xerostomia and medications remains uncertain but greater understanding could guide interventions.

Objective: To describe the demographic characteristics and medication regimens in patients with xerostomia of an academic dental clinic.

Method: This is a retrospective academic dental clinic record review from July 1, 2018 to October 27, 2020. Patient records were obtained from the University at Buffalo, School of Dental Medicine. Xerostomia status was determined via query of electronic health records and validated by manual review. Pharmacologic class and xerostomic potential of medications were identified by the Veterans Affairs Drug Classification System and drug compendia, respectively. Predictors of medication use were assessed using a multiple logistic regression model.

Results: Of 37 403 examined records, 366 (0.98%) were identified as xerostomic. After excluding confounding factors (Sjogren's and radiation), 275 of 317 patients received at least one xerostomic medication, majority were female (240, 66%) versus male (126, 34%). Mean ± (SD) age was 64.9 ± 15.11 years. A total of 208 (57%) patients were aged ≥65. The median number of total and xerostomic medications were 8 (interquartile range [IQR], 4-12) and 4 (IQR, 2-7), respectively. The 3 most prevalent xerostomic pharmacologic classes were antidepressants (131, 35%), gastric medications (101, 28%), and vitamin D (87, 24%).

Conclusion: Despite observed prevalence of xerostomia lower than global prevalence, xerostomic medication burden for patients experiencing xerostomia was high. Pharmacist-led interprofessional collaborations should be investigated to reduce xerostomic burden.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Technology
Journal of Pharmacy Technology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: For both pharmacists and technicians, jPT provides valuable information for those interested in the entire body of pharmacy practice. jPT covers new drugs, products, and equipment; therapeutic trends; organizational, legal, and educational activities; drug distribution and administration; and includes continuing education articles.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Apixaban Use in Patients With Advanced Kidney Disease. Phenobarbital Dosing for the Treatment of Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome: A Review of the Literature. Effectiveness of an Aerosol Inhalation Monitor in an Ambulatory Primary Care Pharmacy Clinic Implementation of Virtual Interactive Cases for Pharmacy Education: A Single-Center Experience. The Role of Telepharmacy in the Delivery of Clinical Pharmacy Services Following the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Descriptive Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1