{"title":"口腔内外联合扫描技术将龈下轮廓从临时修复体转移到最终修复体的真实性","authors":"Koma Sanda, Noriyuki Yasunami, Yasuyuki Matsushita, Akihiro Furuhashi, Tatsuya Matsuzaki, Mikio Imai, Chi-Hsiang Cheng, Kiyoshi Koyano","doi":"10.11607/ijp.7030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the morphologic trueness of provisional and definitive restorations constructed with conventional custom impression techniques to those constructed with intra- and extraoral scanning (IEOS), which can digitally transfer the subgingival morphology of the provisional restoration to the definitive restoration.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Provisional restorations were fabricated on typodonts in which implants were placed. In the conventional method, a customized impression coping was produced by using polymethyl methacrylate resin to transfer the subgingival contour of the provisional restoration. Impressions were taken with silicone impression material, and definitive restorations were made by CAM. The IEOS technique was performed as previously reported. In brief, three individually scanned stereolithography (STL) files were superimposed in CAD software to transfer the morphology of the provisional restoration to the definitive restoration. Definitive restorations were then made by CAM. The provisional and definitive restorations were both scanned by IOS. Scanned data files were superimposed with morphometry software, and the distortions were measured. Student t test was used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The subgingival morphologies of definitive restorations prepared by the conventional method showed significant negative distortions compared to definitive restorations prepared by the IEOS technique.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The IEOS technique can more accurately transfer the subgingival contour of provisional restorations to definitive restorations compared to the conventional customized impression coping technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":50292,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Prosthodontics","volume":"36 3","pages":"308–314"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trueness of the Combined Intra- and Extraoral Scanning Technique for Transferring Subgingival Contours from Provisional Restorations to Definitive Restorations\",\"authors\":\"Koma Sanda, Noriyuki Yasunami, Yasuyuki Matsushita, Akihiro Furuhashi, Tatsuya Matsuzaki, Mikio Imai, Chi-Hsiang Cheng, Kiyoshi Koyano\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/ijp.7030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the morphologic trueness of provisional and definitive restorations constructed with conventional custom impression techniques to those constructed with intra- and extraoral scanning (IEOS), which can digitally transfer the subgingival morphology of the provisional restoration to the definitive restoration.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Provisional restorations were fabricated on typodonts in which implants were placed. In the conventional method, a customized impression coping was produced by using polymethyl methacrylate resin to transfer the subgingival contour of the provisional restoration. Impressions were taken with silicone impression material, and definitive restorations were made by CAM. The IEOS technique was performed as previously reported. In brief, three individually scanned stereolithography (STL) files were superimposed in CAD software to transfer the morphology of the provisional restoration to the definitive restoration. Definitive restorations were then made by CAM. The provisional and definitive restorations were both scanned by IOS. Scanned data files were superimposed with morphometry software, and the distortions were measured. Student t test was used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The subgingival morphologies of definitive restorations prepared by the conventional method showed significant negative distortions compared to definitive restorations prepared by the IEOS technique.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The IEOS technique can more accurately transfer the subgingival contour of provisional restorations to definitive restorations compared to the conventional customized impression coping technique.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Prosthodontics\",\"volume\":\"36 3\",\"pages\":\"308–314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Prosthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.7030\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.7030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Trueness of the Combined Intra- and Extraoral Scanning Technique for Transferring Subgingival Contours from Provisional Restorations to Definitive Restorations
Purpose: To compare the morphologic trueness of provisional and definitive restorations constructed with conventional custom impression techniques to those constructed with intra- and extraoral scanning (IEOS), which can digitally transfer the subgingival morphology of the provisional restoration to the definitive restoration.
Materials and methods: Provisional restorations were fabricated on typodonts in which implants were placed. In the conventional method, a customized impression coping was produced by using polymethyl methacrylate resin to transfer the subgingival contour of the provisional restoration. Impressions were taken with silicone impression material, and definitive restorations were made by CAM. The IEOS technique was performed as previously reported. In brief, three individually scanned stereolithography (STL) files were superimposed in CAD software to transfer the morphology of the provisional restoration to the definitive restoration. Definitive restorations were then made by CAM. The provisional and definitive restorations were both scanned by IOS. Scanned data files were superimposed with morphometry software, and the distortions were measured. Student t test was used for statistical analysis.
Results: The subgingival morphologies of definitive restorations prepared by the conventional method showed significant negative distortions compared to definitive restorations prepared by the IEOS technique.
Conclusion: The IEOS technique can more accurately transfer the subgingival contour of provisional restorations to definitive restorations compared to the conventional customized impression coping technique.
期刊介绍:
Official Journal of the European Association for Osseointegration (EAO), the International College of Prosthodontists (ICP), the German Society of Prosthodontics and Dental Materials Science (DGPro), and the Italian Academy of Prosthetic Dentistry (AIOP)
Prosthodontics demands a clinical research emphasis on patient- and dentist-mediated concerns in the management of oral rehabilitation needs. It is about making and implementing the best clinical decisions to enhance patients'' quality of life via applied biologic architecture - a role that far exceeds that of traditional prosthetic dentistry, with its emphasis on materials and techniques. The International Journal of Prosthodontics is dedicated to exploring and developing this conceptual shift in the role of today''s prosthodontist, clinician, and educator alike. The editorial board is composed of a distinguished team of leading international scholars.