2019冠状病毒病疫情中未被发现感染的估计方法:系统综述

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Infectious disorders drug targets Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1871526523666230124162103
Esmaeil Mehraeen, Zahra Pashaei, Fatemeh Khajeh Akhtaran, Mohsen Dashti, Arian Afzalian, Afsaneh Ghasemzadeh, Pooria Asili, Mohammad Saeed Kahrizi, Maryam Mirahmad, Ensiyeh Rahimi, Parisa Matini, Amir Masoud Afsahi, Omid Dadras, SeyedAhmad SeyedAlinaghi
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病疫情中未被发现感染的估计方法:系统综述","authors":"Esmaeil Mehraeen, Zahra Pashaei, Fatemeh Khajeh Akhtaran, Mohsen Dashti, Arian Afzalian, Afsaneh Ghasemzadeh, Pooria Asili, Mohammad Saeed Kahrizi, Maryam Mirahmad, Ensiyeh Rahimi, Parisa Matini, Amir Masoud Afsahi, Omid Dadras, SeyedAhmad SeyedAlinaghi","doi":"10.2174/1871526523666230124162103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION The accurate number of COVID-19 cases is essential knowledge to control an epidemic. Currently, one of the most important obstacles in estimating the exact number of COVID-19 patients is the absence of typical clinical symptoms in a large number of people, called asymptomatic infections. In this systematic review, we included and evaluated the studies mainly focusing on the prediction of undetected COVID-19 incidence and mortality rates as well as the reproduction numbers, utilizing various mathematical models. METHODS This systematic review aims to investigate the estimating methods of undetected infections in the COVID-19 outbreak. Databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, and Embase, were searched for a combination of keywords. Applying the inclusion/ exclusion criteria, all retrieved English literature by April 7, 2022, were reviewed for data extraction through a two-step screening process; first, titles/ abstracts, and then full-text. This study is consistent with the PRISMA checklist. RESULTS In this study, 61 documents were retrieved using a systematic search strategy. After an initial review of retrieved articles, 6 articles were excluded and the remaining 55 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final review. Most of the studies used mathematical models to estimate the number of underreported asymptomatic infected cases, assessing incidence and prevalence rates more precisely. The spread of COVID-19 has been investigated using various mathematical models. The output statistics were compared with official statistics obtained from different countries. Although the number of reported patients was lower than the estimated numbers, it appeared that the mathematical calculations could be a useful measure to predict pandemics and proper planning. CONCLUSION In conclusion, our study demonstrates the effectiveness of mathematical models in unraveling the true burden of the COVID-19 pandemic in terms of more precise, and accurate infection and mortality rates, and reproduction numbers, thus, statistical mathematical modeling could be an effective tool for measuring the detrimental global burden of pandemic infections. Additionally, they could be a really useful method for future pandemics and would assist the healthcare and public health systems with more accurate and valid information.","PeriodicalId":13678,"journal":{"name":"Infectious disorders drug targets","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating Methods of the Undetected Infections in the COVID-19 Outbreak: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Esmaeil Mehraeen, Zahra Pashaei, Fatemeh Khajeh Akhtaran, Mohsen Dashti, Arian Afzalian, Afsaneh Ghasemzadeh, Pooria Asili, Mohammad Saeed Kahrizi, Maryam Mirahmad, Ensiyeh Rahimi, Parisa Matini, Amir Masoud Afsahi, Omid Dadras, SeyedAhmad SeyedAlinaghi\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1871526523666230124162103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION The accurate number of COVID-19 cases is essential knowledge to control an epidemic. Currently, one of the most important obstacles in estimating the exact number of COVID-19 patients is the absence of typical clinical symptoms in a large number of people, called asymptomatic infections. In this systematic review, we included and evaluated the studies mainly focusing on the prediction of undetected COVID-19 incidence and mortality rates as well as the reproduction numbers, utilizing various mathematical models. METHODS This systematic review aims to investigate the estimating methods of undetected infections in the COVID-19 outbreak. Databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, and Embase, were searched for a combination of keywords. Applying the inclusion/ exclusion criteria, all retrieved English literature by April 7, 2022, were reviewed for data extraction through a two-step screening process; first, titles/ abstracts, and then full-text. This study is consistent with the PRISMA checklist. RESULTS In this study, 61 documents were retrieved using a systematic search strategy. After an initial review of retrieved articles, 6 articles were excluded and the remaining 55 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final review. Most of the studies used mathematical models to estimate the number of underreported asymptomatic infected cases, assessing incidence and prevalence rates more precisely. The spread of COVID-19 has been investigated using various mathematical models. The output statistics were compared with official statistics obtained from different countries. Although the number of reported patients was lower than the estimated numbers, it appeared that the mathematical calculations could be a useful measure to predict pandemics and proper planning. CONCLUSION In conclusion, our study demonstrates the effectiveness of mathematical models in unraveling the true burden of the COVID-19 pandemic in terms of more precise, and accurate infection and mortality rates, and reproduction numbers, thus, statistical mathematical modeling could be an effective tool for measuring the detrimental global burden of pandemic infections. Additionally, they could be a really useful method for future pandemics and would assist the healthcare and public health systems with more accurate and valid information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infectious disorders drug targets\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infectious disorders drug targets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1871526523666230124162103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious disorders drug targets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1871526523666230124162103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导语:准确掌握新冠肺炎病例数是疫情防控的重要知识。目前,估计COVID-19患者确切人数的最重要障碍之一是大量人没有典型的临床症状,即无症状感染。在本系统综述中,我们利用各种数学模型,纳入并评估了主要关注未检测到的COVID-19发病率和死亡率以及繁殖数预测的研究。方法:本系统综述旨在探讨2019冠状病毒病疫情中未被发现感染的估计方法。在PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、Cochrane和Embase等数据库中搜索关键词组合。应用纳入/排除标准,通过两步筛选流程对2022年4月7日前检索到的所有英文文献进行数据提取;首先是标题/摘要,然后是全文。本研究符合PRISMA检查表。结果:本研究采用系统检索策略检索了61篇文献。在对检索到的文章进行初步审查后,6篇文章被排除,其余55篇文章符合纳入标准,被纳入最终审查。大多数研究使用数学模型来估计未报告的无症状感染病例的数量,更准确地评估发病率和流行率。使用各种数学模型对COVID-19的传播进行了调查。产出统计数据与来自不同国家的官方统计数据进行了比较。虽然报告的患者人数低于估计数字,但数学计算似乎可以成为预测流行病和适当规划的有用措施。总之,我们的研究证明了数学模型在揭示COVID-19大流行的真实负担方面的有效性,更精确,更准确的感染和死亡率,以及繁殖数字,因此,统计数学模型可以成为衡量大流行感染有害的全球负担的有效工具。此外,它们可能是未来流行病的一种非常有用的方法,并将帮助医疗保健和公共卫生系统提供更准确和有效的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimating Methods of the Undetected Infections in the COVID-19 Outbreak: A Systematic Review.
INTRODUCTION The accurate number of COVID-19 cases is essential knowledge to control an epidemic. Currently, one of the most important obstacles in estimating the exact number of COVID-19 patients is the absence of typical clinical symptoms in a large number of people, called asymptomatic infections. In this systematic review, we included and evaluated the studies mainly focusing on the prediction of undetected COVID-19 incidence and mortality rates as well as the reproduction numbers, utilizing various mathematical models. METHODS This systematic review aims to investigate the estimating methods of undetected infections in the COVID-19 outbreak. Databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, and Embase, were searched for a combination of keywords. Applying the inclusion/ exclusion criteria, all retrieved English literature by April 7, 2022, were reviewed for data extraction through a two-step screening process; first, titles/ abstracts, and then full-text. This study is consistent with the PRISMA checklist. RESULTS In this study, 61 documents were retrieved using a systematic search strategy. After an initial review of retrieved articles, 6 articles were excluded and the remaining 55 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final review. Most of the studies used mathematical models to estimate the number of underreported asymptomatic infected cases, assessing incidence and prevalence rates more precisely. The spread of COVID-19 has been investigated using various mathematical models. The output statistics were compared with official statistics obtained from different countries. Although the number of reported patients was lower than the estimated numbers, it appeared that the mathematical calculations could be a useful measure to predict pandemics and proper planning. CONCLUSION In conclusion, our study demonstrates the effectiveness of mathematical models in unraveling the true burden of the COVID-19 pandemic in terms of more precise, and accurate infection and mortality rates, and reproduction numbers, thus, statistical mathematical modeling could be an effective tool for measuring the detrimental global burden of pandemic infections. Additionally, they could be a really useful method for future pandemics and would assist the healthcare and public health systems with more accurate and valid information.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infectious disorders drug targets
Infectious disorders drug targets Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Infectious Disorders - Drug Targets aims to cover all the latest and outstanding developments on the medicinal chemistry, pharmacology, molecular biology, genomics and biochemistry of contemporary molecular targets involved in infectious disorders e.g. disease specific proteins, receptors, enzymes, genes. Each issue of the journal contains a series of timely in-depth reviews written by leaders in the field covering a range of current topics on drug targets involved in infectious disorders. As the discovery, identification, characterization and validation of novel human drug targets for anti-infective drug discovery continues to grow, this journal will be essential reading for all pharmaceutical scientists involved in drug discovery and development.
期刊最新文献
Vigilance Needed in Treating a Child with Disseminated TB: A Case Report. Vitamin D and Mitochondrial Activity Preservation in COVID-19. Recombinant ACE2 - Opportunities and Challenges in COVID-19 Treatment. Outbreak and Management Strategies of Nipah Virus: A Scenario from the Southern Part of India. A Day Saved is a Life Saved: Direct Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing from Positively Flagged Blood Culture Bottles and their Concordance with the Routine Method.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1