人际问题-人格障碍量表:对巴西的适应和双因素模型的检验

Lucas de Francisco Carvalho, Nelson Hauck Filho, André Pereira Gonçalves, Giselle Pianowski, Lia Rocha
{"title":"人际问题-人格障碍量表:对巴西的适应和双因素模型的检验","authors":"Lucas de Francisco Carvalho,&nbsp;Nelson Hauck Filho,&nbsp;André Pereira Gonçalves,&nbsp;Giselle Pianowski,&nbsp;Lia Rocha","doi":"10.1016/j.rcpeng.2021.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The Inventory of Interpersonal Problems–Personality Disorders (IIP-PD-47) has a controversial factor structure, as some studies have provided support for 5 correlated factors, and others have suggested the existence of a general second-order dimension. One approach of data modelling that reconciles multidimensionality and the existence of a general factor is the bifactor analysis. We used unrestricted exploratory-confirmatory bifactor modelling to validate the Brazilian version of the IIP-PD-47.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The sample consisted of 1,091 subjects aged 18-64 years who answered the IIP-PD-47 and a collateral measure of pathological traits, the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory 2 (IDCP-2).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After testing many candidate models, our data were best represented by a bifactor model with one general factor and five specific uncorrelated factors. Nevertheless, a closer inspection of the discriminant validity of each IIP-PD-47 factor revealed strong support for the general factor and a factor capturing aggressive behaviours, but less support for the additional four specific factors.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed, and some recommendations are offered about the need for controlling response styles when assessing PD traits via self-report inventories. Our findings indicate that the Brazilian version of IIP-PD has promising psychometric properties.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74702,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de psiquiatria (English ed.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inventory of Interpersonal Problems–Personality Disorders: adaptation to Brazil and test of a bifactor model\",\"authors\":\"Lucas de Francisco Carvalho,&nbsp;Nelson Hauck Filho,&nbsp;André Pereira Gonçalves,&nbsp;Giselle Pianowski,&nbsp;Lia Rocha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rcpeng.2021.03.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The Inventory of Interpersonal Problems–Personality Disorders (IIP-PD-47) has a controversial factor structure, as some studies have provided support for 5 correlated factors, and others have suggested the existence of a general second-order dimension. One approach of data modelling that reconciles multidimensionality and the existence of a general factor is the bifactor analysis. We used unrestricted exploratory-confirmatory bifactor modelling to validate the Brazilian version of the IIP-PD-47.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The sample consisted of 1,091 subjects aged 18-64 years who answered the IIP-PD-47 and a collateral measure of pathological traits, the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory 2 (IDCP-2).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After testing many candidate models, our data were best represented by a bifactor model with one general factor and five specific uncorrelated factors. Nevertheless, a closer inspection of the discriminant validity of each IIP-PD-47 factor revealed strong support for the general factor and a factor capturing aggressive behaviours, but less support for the additional four specific factors.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed, and some recommendations are offered about the need for controlling response styles when assessing PD traits via self-report inventories. Our findings indicate that the Brazilian version of IIP-PD has promising psychometric properties.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Colombiana de psiquiatria (English ed.)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Colombiana de psiquiatria (English ed.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530312023000097\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Colombiana de psiquiatria (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530312023000097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的人际问题-人格障碍量表(IIP-PD-47)的因子结构存在争议,有的研究支持5个相关因子,有的研究认为存在一般的二阶维度。一种协调多维性和一般因素存在的数据建模方法是双因素分析。我们使用不受限制的探索性验证双因素模型来验证巴西版本的IIP-PD-47。方法对1091名年龄在18-64岁之间的被试进行了IIP-PD-47和病理特征维度临床人格量表(IDCP-2)的辅助测量。结果在测试了多个候选模型后,我们的数据最适合由一个一般因素和五个特定不相关因素组成的双因素模型。然而,仔细检查每个IIP-PD-47因素的判别效度,发现对一般因素和捕获攻击行为的因素有很强的支持,但对另外四个特定因素的支持较少。结论讨论了上述研究结果的理论和实践意义,并对通过自我报告量表评估PD特征时控制反应方式的必要性提出了一些建议。我们的研究结果表明,巴西版的IIP-PD具有很好的心理测量特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inventory of Interpersonal Problems–Personality Disorders: adaptation to Brazil and test of a bifactor model

Objective

The Inventory of Interpersonal Problems–Personality Disorders (IIP-PD-47) has a controversial factor structure, as some studies have provided support for 5 correlated factors, and others have suggested the existence of a general second-order dimension. One approach of data modelling that reconciles multidimensionality and the existence of a general factor is the bifactor analysis. We used unrestricted exploratory-confirmatory bifactor modelling to validate the Brazilian version of the IIP-PD-47.

Methods

The sample consisted of 1,091 subjects aged 18-64 years who answered the IIP-PD-47 and a collateral measure of pathological traits, the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory 2 (IDCP-2).

Results

After testing many candidate models, our data were best represented by a bifactor model with one general factor and five specific uncorrelated factors. Nevertheless, a closer inspection of the discriminant validity of each IIP-PD-47 factor revealed strong support for the general factor and a factor capturing aggressive behaviours, but less support for the additional four specific factors.

Conclusions

The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed, and some recommendations are offered about the need for controlling response styles when assessing PD traits via self-report inventories. Our findings indicate that the Brazilian version of IIP-PD has promising psychometric properties.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adherence to psychopharmacological treatment in patients with severe and persistent mental disorders: A systematic review Assessing skills in psychiatry. Experience and implementation of OSCE for medical students Association between cognitive impairment and socioeconomic and sociodemographic factors in Colombian older adults Successful treatment for serious depression with suicidal risk in a heart transplant patient Telerehabilitation of subjects with neurodevelopmental disorders during confinement due to COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1