运用项目反应理论编制护理工作指标的简易实习环境量表。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Research in Nursing & Health Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1002/nur.22324
Aoyjai P Montgomery, Caitlin M Campbell, Andres Azuero, Pauline A Swiger, Patricia A Patrician
{"title":"运用项目反应理论编制护理工作指标的简易实习环境量表。","authors":"Aoyjai P Montgomery,&nbsp;Caitlin M Campbell,&nbsp;Andres Azuero,&nbsp;Pauline A Swiger,&nbsp;Patricia A Patrician","doi":"10.1002/nur.22324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 31-item Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI) has been frequently used globally to measure the nurse work environment. However, due to its length and subsequent respondent burden, a more parsimonious version of the PES-NWI may be desirable. Item response theory (IRT) is a statistical technique that assists in decreasing the number of items in an instrument without sacrificing reliability and validity. Two separate samples of nurses in the United States (one called the \"internal data source\" and the other called \"external data source\"; sample sizes = 843 and 722, respectively) were analyzed. The internal data source was randomly split into training (n = 531) and validating data sets (n = 312), while a separate whole external data source was used as the final validating data set. Using IRT with training data, we removed nine items; two additional items were removed based on recommendations from a previous study. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the validity of the measurement model with the 20-item of PES-NWI in both internal and external validation data sources. The correlations among subscales between 31- and 20-item versions were high magnitude for five subscales in both validation data sets (τ = 0.84-0.89). Ultimately, we identified a 20-item version of the PES-NWI which demonstrated adequate validity and reliability properties while decreasing data collection burden yet maintaining a similar factor structure to the original instrument. Additional research may be necessary to update the items themselves on the PES-NWI.</p>","PeriodicalId":54492,"journal":{"name":"Research in Nursing & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using item response theory to develop a shortened practice environment scale of the nursing work index.\",\"authors\":\"Aoyjai P Montgomery,&nbsp;Caitlin M Campbell,&nbsp;Andres Azuero,&nbsp;Pauline A Swiger,&nbsp;Patricia A Patrician\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nur.22324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The 31-item Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI) has been frequently used globally to measure the nurse work environment. However, due to its length and subsequent respondent burden, a more parsimonious version of the PES-NWI may be desirable. Item response theory (IRT) is a statistical technique that assists in decreasing the number of items in an instrument without sacrificing reliability and validity. Two separate samples of nurses in the United States (one called the \\\"internal data source\\\" and the other called \\\"external data source\\\"; sample sizes = 843 and 722, respectively) were analyzed. The internal data source was randomly split into training (n = 531) and validating data sets (n = 312), while a separate whole external data source was used as the final validating data set. Using IRT with training data, we removed nine items; two additional items were removed based on recommendations from a previous study. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the validity of the measurement model with the 20-item of PES-NWI in both internal and external validation data sources. The correlations among subscales between 31- and 20-item versions were high magnitude for five subscales in both validation data sets (τ = 0.84-0.89). Ultimately, we identified a 20-item version of the PES-NWI which demonstrated adequate validity and reliability properties while decreasing data collection burden yet maintaining a similar factor structure to the original instrument. Additional research may be necessary to update the items themselves on the PES-NWI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Nursing & Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Nursing & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.22324\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Nursing & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.22324","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

31项护理工作环境量表(PES-NWI)在全球范围内被广泛用于衡量护士工作环境。然而,由于其长度和随后的应答者负担,更精简的PES-NWI版本可能是可取的。项目反应理论(IRT)是一种统计技术,有助于在不牺牲信度和效度的情况下减少工具中的项目数量。美国护士的两个独立样本(一个称为“内部数据源”,另一个称为“外部数据源”;样本量分别为843和722)。内部数据源随机分为训练数据集(n = 531)和验证数据集(n = 312),而单独的完整外部数据源作为最终验证数据集。使用IRT和训练数据,我们删除了9个项目;根据先前研究的建议,删除了另外两个项目。验证性因子分析在内部和外部验证数据源中均支持了PES-NWI 20项测量模型的有效性。在两个验证数据集中,有5个分量表的31项版本和20项版本之间的相关性都很高(τ = 0.84-0.89)。最终,我们确定了一个包含20个项目的PES-NWI版本,该版本显示了足够的有效性和可靠性,同时减少了数据收集负担,同时保持了与原始工具相似的因子结构。可能需要额外的研究来更新PES-NWI上的项目本身。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using item response theory to develop a shortened practice environment scale of the nursing work index.

The 31-item Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI) has been frequently used globally to measure the nurse work environment. However, due to its length and subsequent respondent burden, a more parsimonious version of the PES-NWI may be desirable. Item response theory (IRT) is a statistical technique that assists in decreasing the number of items in an instrument without sacrificing reliability and validity. Two separate samples of nurses in the United States (one called the "internal data source" and the other called "external data source"; sample sizes = 843 and 722, respectively) were analyzed. The internal data source was randomly split into training (n = 531) and validating data sets (n = 312), while a separate whole external data source was used as the final validating data set. Using IRT with training data, we removed nine items; two additional items were removed based on recommendations from a previous study. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the validity of the measurement model with the 20-item of PES-NWI in both internal and external validation data sources. The correlations among subscales between 31- and 20-item versions were high magnitude for five subscales in both validation data sets (τ = 0.84-0.89). Ultimately, we identified a 20-item version of the PES-NWI which demonstrated adequate validity and reliability properties while decreasing data collection burden yet maintaining a similar factor structure to the original instrument. Additional research may be necessary to update the items themselves on the PES-NWI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research in Nursing & Health ( RINAH ) is a peer-reviewed general research journal devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will inform the practice of nursing and other health disciplines. The editors invite reports of research describing problems and testing interventions related to health phenomena, health care and self-care, clinical organization and administration; and the testing of research findings in practice. Research protocols are considered if funded in a peer-reviewed process by an agency external to the authors’ home institution and if the work is in progress. Papers on research methods and techniques are appropriate if they go beyond what is already generally available in the literature and include description of successful use of the method. Theory papers are accepted if each proposition is supported by research evidence. Systematic reviews of the literature are reviewed if PRISMA guidelines are followed. Letters to the editor commenting on published articles are welcome.
期刊最新文献
The disease recurrence perception scale for patients with inflammatory bowel disease: Instrument development and cross-sectional validation study. Nursing researchers' concern about research activities during the COVID-19 pandemic: A secondary analysis of longitudinal survey data in Japan. Nurses under fire: Insights from testimonies of community nurses and midwives in nonhospital settings in the southern Israel conflict zone. Self-efficacy and autonomous motivation are associated with lower sugar-sweetened beverage consumption in low-income overweight and obese mothers of young children. REDUCE missed oral healthcare: The outcomes of and learnings from an implementation project in an acute geriatric unit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1