术后出院阿片类药物的处方,使用和管理程序后的处理。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1177/0310057X231160800
Megan L Allen, Anurika P De Silva, Sabine Braat, Karin Jones, Angela Chia, Timothy R Hucker, Sally L Brooks, Malcolm Hogg, Chuan-Whei Lee, Daryl L Williams, Charles C Kim
{"title":"术后出院阿片类药物的处方,使用和管理程序后的处理。","authors":"Megan L Allen,&nbsp;Anurika P De Silva,&nbsp;Sabine Braat,&nbsp;Karin Jones,&nbsp;Angela Chia,&nbsp;Timothy R Hucker,&nbsp;Sally L Brooks,&nbsp;Malcolm Hogg,&nbsp;Chuan-Whei Lee,&nbsp;Daryl L Williams,&nbsp;Charles C Kim","doi":"10.1177/0310057X231160800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>SummaryOpioids are often used to provide postsurgical analgesia but may cause harm if used inappropriately. We introduced an opioid stewardship program in three Melbourne hospitals to reduce the inappropriate use of opioids after patient discharge. The program had four pillars: prescriber education, patient education, a standardised quantity of discharge opioids, and general practitioner (GP) communication. Following introduction of the program, we undertook this prospective cohort study. The study aimed to describe post-program discharge opioid prescribing, patient opioid use and handling, and the impact of patient demographics, pain and surgical treatment factors on discharge prescribing. We also evaluated compliance with the program components. We recruited 884 surgical patients from the three hospitals during the ten-week study period. Discharge opioids were dispensed to 604 (74%) patients, with 20% receiving slow-release opioids. Junior medical staff undertook 95% of discharge opioid prescribing, which was guideline-compliant for 78% of patients. Of the patients discharged with opioids, a GP letter was sent for only 17%. Follow-up at two weeks was successful in 423 (70%) patients and in 404 (67%) at three months. At the three-month follow-up, 9.7% of patients reported ongoing opioid use; in preoperatively opioid naïve patients, the incidence was 5.5%. At the two-week follow-up, only 5% reported disposal of excess opioids, increasing to 26% at three months. Ongoing opioid therapy at three months in our study cohort (9.7%; 39/404) was associated with preoperative opioid consumption and higher pain scores at the three-month follow-up. The introduction of the opioid stewardship program resulted in highly guideline-compliant prescribing, but hospital-to-GP communication was uncommon and opioid disposal rates were low. Our findings suggest that opioid stewardship programs can improve postoperative opioid prescribing, use and handling, but the realisation of these gains will require effective program implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7746,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":"51 4","pages":"239-253"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-surgical discharge opioid prescribing, use and handling after introduction of a stewardship program.\",\"authors\":\"Megan L Allen,&nbsp;Anurika P De Silva,&nbsp;Sabine Braat,&nbsp;Karin Jones,&nbsp;Angela Chia,&nbsp;Timothy R Hucker,&nbsp;Sally L Brooks,&nbsp;Malcolm Hogg,&nbsp;Chuan-Whei Lee,&nbsp;Daryl L Williams,&nbsp;Charles C Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0310057X231160800\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>SummaryOpioids are often used to provide postsurgical analgesia but may cause harm if used inappropriately. We introduced an opioid stewardship program in three Melbourne hospitals to reduce the inappropriate use of opioids after patient discharge. The program had four pillars: prescriber education, patient education, a standardised quantity of discharge opioids, and general practitioner (GP) communication. Following introduction of the program, we undertook this prospective cohort study. The study aimed to describe post-program discharge opioid prescribing, patient opioid use and handling, and the impact of patient demographics, pain and surgical treatment factors on discharge prescribing. We also evaluated compliance with the program components. We recruited 884 surgical patients from the three hospitals during the ten-week study period. Discharge opioids were dispensed to 604 (74%) patients, with 20% receiving slow-release opioids. Junior medical staff undertook 95% of discharge opioid prescribing, which was guideline-compliant for 78% of patients. Of the patients discharged with opioids, a GP letter was sent for only 17%. Follow-up at two weeks was successful in 423 (70%) patients and in 404 (67%) at three months. At the three-month follow-up, 9.7% of patients reported ongoing opioid use; in preoperatively opioid naïve patients, the incidence was 5.5%. At the two-week follow-up, only 5% reported disposal of excess opioids, increasing to 26% at three months. Ongoing opioid therapy at three months in our study cohort (9.7%; 39/404) was associated with preoperative opioid consumption and higher pain scores at the three-month follow-up. The introduction of the opioid stewardship program resulted in highly guideline-compliant prescribing, but hospital-to-GP communication was uncommon and opioid disposal rates were low. Our findings suggest that opioid stewardship programs can improve postoperative opioid prescribing, use and handling, but the realisation of these gains will require effective program implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care\",\"volume\":\"51 4\",\"pages\":\"239-253\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X231160800\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X231160800","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

阿片类药物常用于术后镇痛,但如果使用不当可能会造成伤害。我们在墨尔本的三家医院引入了阿片类药物管理计划,以减少患者出院后阿片类药物的不当使用。该项目有四个支柱:开处方者教育、患者教育、阿片类药物出院标准化数量以及全科医生(GP)沟通。在引入该项目后,我们进行了这项前瞻性队列研究。该研究旨在描述项目后出院阿片类药物处方,患者阿片类药物使用和处理,以及患者人口统计学,疼痛和手术治疗因素对出院处方的影响。我们还评估了与程序组件的遵从性。在为期10周的研究期间,我们从三家医院招募了884名外科患者。604例(74%)患者使用出院阿片类药物,其中20%使用缓释阿片类药物。初级医务人员承担了95%的出院阿片类药物处方,78%的患者符合指南要求。在服用阿片类药物出院的患者中,只有17%的人收到了GP信。423例(70%)患者两周随访成功,404例(67%)患者三个月随访成功。在三个月的随访中,9.7%的患者报告正在使用阿片类药物;术前阿片类药物naïve患者的发生率为5.5%。在两周的随访中,只有5%的人报告处理了过量的阿片类药物,三个月后增加到26%。在我们的研究队列中,持续3个月的阿片类药物治疗(9.7%;39/404)与术前阿片类药物消耗和三个月随访时较高的疼痛评分相关。阿片类药物管理计划的引入导致了高度符合指南的处方,但医院与全科医生的沟通并不常见,阿片类药物处理率很低。我们的研究结果表明,阿片类药物管理计划可以改善术后阿片类药物的处方、使用和处理,但实现这些收益将需要有效的计划实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Post-surgical discharge opioid prescribing, use and handling after introduction of a stewardship program.

SummaryOpioids are often used to provide postsurgical analgesia but may cause harm if used inappropriately. We introduced an opioid stewardship program in three Melbourne hospitals to reduce the inappropriate use of opioids after patient discharge. The program had four pillars: prescriber education, patient education, a standardised quantity of discharge opioids, and general practitioner (GP) communication. Following introduction of the program, we undertook this prospective cohort study. The study aimed to describe post-program discharge opioid prescribing, patient opioid use and handling, and the impact of patient demographics, pain and surgical treatment factors on discharge prescribing. We also evaluated compliance with the program components. We recruited 884 surgical patients from the three hospitals during the ten-week study period. Discharge opioids were dispensed to 604 (74%) patients, with 20% receiving slow-release opioids. Junior medical staff undertook 95% of discharge opioid prescribing, which was guideline-compliant for 78% of patients. Of the patients discharged with opioids, a GP letter was sent for only 17%. Follow-up at two weeks was successful in 423 (70%) patients and in 404 (67%) at three months. At the three-month follow-up, 9.7% of patients reported ongoing opioid use; in preoperatively opioid naïve patients, the incidence was 5.5%. At the two-week follow-up, only 5% reported disposal of excess opioids, increasing to 26% at three months. Ongoing opioid therapy at three months in our study cohort (9.7%; 39/404) was associated with preoperative opioid consumption and higher pain scores at the three-month follow-up. The introduction of the opioid stewardship program resulted in highly guideline-compliant prescribing, but hospital-to-GP communication was uncommon and opioid disposal rates were low. Our findings suggest that opioid stewardship programs can improve postoperative opioid prescribing, use and handling, but the realisation of these gains will require effective program implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
150
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Anaesthesia and Intensive Care is an international journal publishing timely, peer reviewed articles that have educational value and scientific merit for clinicians and researchers associated with anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, and pain medicine.
期刊最新文献
Experiences and outcomes of patients participating in a perioperative shared decision-making pathway. JG Farrell and The Lung: An early description of intensive care delirium in literature. Promoting behavioural change by educating anaesthetists about the environmental impact of inhalational anaesthetic agents: A systematic review. MET call prevention. A cross-sectional study of the relationship between iron deficiency anaemia and chronic pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1