利用语言和语言障碍的临床和计算测量来描述和检测谵妄。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience Pub Date : 2023-07-04 Print Date: 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1503/jpn.230026
Sunny X Tang, Yan Cong, Gwenyth Mercep, Mutahira Bhatti, Grace Serpe, Valeria Gromova, Sarah Berretta, Majnu John, Mark Y Liberman, Liron Sinvani
{"title":"利用语言和语言障碍的临床和计算测量来描述和检测谵妄。","authors":"Sunny X Tang, Yan Cong, Gwenyth Mercep, Mutahira Bhatti, Grace Serpe, Valeria Gromova, Sarah Berretta, Majnu John, Mark Y Liberman, Liron Sinvani","doi":"10.1503/jpn.230026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delirium is a critically underdiagnosed syndrome of altered mental status affecting more than 50% of older adults admitted to hospital. Few studies have incorporated speech and language disturbance in delirium detection. We sought to describe speech and language disturbances in delirium, and provide a proof of concept for detecting delirium using computational speech and language features.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants underwent delirium assessment and completed language tasks. Speech and language disturbances were rated using standardized clinical scales. Recordings and transcripts were processed using an automated pipeline to extract acoustic and textual features. We used binomial, elastic net, machine learning models to predict delirium status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 33 older adults admitted to hospital, of whom 10 met criteria for delirium. The group with delirium scored higher on total language disturbances and incoherence, and lower on category fluency. Both groups scored lower on category fluency than the normative population. Cognitive dysfunction as a continuous measure was correlated with higher total language disturbance, incoherence, loss of goal and lower category fluency. Including computational language features in the model predicting delirium status increased accuracy to 78%.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>This was a proof-of-concept study with limited sample size, without a set-aside cross-validation sample. Subsequent studies are needed before establishing a generalizable model for detecting delirium.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Language impairments were elevated among patients with delirium and may also be used to identify subthreshold cognitive disturbances. Computational speech and language features are promising as accurate, noninvasive and efficient biomarkers of delirium.</p>","PeriodicalId":50073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience","volume":"48 4","pages":"E255-E264"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0d/74/48-4-E255.PMC10322161.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterizing and detecting delirium with clinical and computational measures of speech and language disturbance.\",\"authors\":\"Sunny X Tang, Yan Cong, Gwenyth Mercep, Mutahira Bhatti, Grace Serpe, Valeria Gromova, Sarah Berretta, Majnu John, Mark Y Liberman, Liron Sinvani\",\"doi\":\"10.1503/jpn.230026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delirium is a critically underdiagnosed syndrome of altered mental status affecting more than 50% of older adults admitted to hospital. Few studies have incorporated speech and language disturbance in delirium detection. We sought to describe speech and language disturbances in delirium, and provide a proof of concept for detecting delirium using computational speech and language features.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants underwent delirium assessment and completed language tasks. Speech and language disturbances were rated using standardized clinical scales. Recordings and transcripts were processed using an automated pipeline to extract acoustic and textual features. We used binomial, elastic net, machine learning models to predict delirium status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 33 older adults admitted to hospital, of whom 10 met criteria for delirium. The group with delirium scored higher on total language disturbances and incoherence, and lower on category fluency. Both groups scored lower on category fluency than the normative population. Cognitive dysfunction as a continuous measure was correlated with higher total language disturbance, incoherence, loss of goal and lower category fluency. Including computational language features in the model predicting delirium status increased accuracy to 78%.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>This was a proof-of-concept study with limited sample size, without a set-aside cross-validation sample. Subsequent studies are needed before establishing a generalizable model for detecting delirium.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Language impairments were elevated among patients with delirium and may also be used to identify subthreshold cognitive disturbances. Computational speech and language features are promising as accurate, noninvasive and efficient biomarkers of delirium.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"48 4\",\"pages\":\"E255-E264\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0d/74/48-4-E255.PMC10322161.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.230026\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.230026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:谵妄是一种严重诊断不足的精神状态改变综合征,影响到 50%以上的入院老年人。很少有研究将言语障碍纳入谵妄检测。我们试图描述谵妄中的言语和语言障碍,并提供利用计算言语和语言特征检测谵妄的概念验证:方法:参与者接受谵妄评估并完成语言任务。方法:参试者接受谵妄评估并完成语言任务,使用标准化临床量表对言语和语言障碍进行评分。录音和记录誊本使用自动管道进行处理,以提取声音和文本特征。我们使用二项式、弹性网、机器学习模型来预测谵妄状态:我们纳入了 33 名住院老年人,其中 10 人符合谵妄标准。谵妄组在总语言障碍和不连贯方面得分较高,在类别流畅性方面得分较低。两组人在类别流畅性方面的得分均低于常模人群。认知功能障碍作为一项连续测量指标,与较高的总语言障碍、不连贯、目标丧失和较低的类别流畅性相关。在预测谵妄状态的模型中加入计算语言特征,可将准确率提高到78%:局限性:这只是一项概念验证研究,样本量有限,没有设定交叉验证样本。在建立可推广的谵妄检测模型之前,还需要进行后续研究:结论:谵妄患者的语言障碍程度较高,也可用于识别阈值以下的认知障碍。计算语音和语言特征有望成为准确、无创和高效的谵妄生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Characterizing and detecting delirium with clinical and computational measures of speech and language disturbance.

Background: Delirium is a critically underdiagnosed syndrome of altered mental status affecting more than 50% of older adults admitted to hospital. Few studies have incorporated speech and language disturbance in delirium detection. We sought to describe speech and language disturbances in delirium, and provide a proof of concept for detecting delirium using computational speech and language features.

Methods: Participants underwent delirium assessment and completed language tasks. Speech and language disturbances were rated using standardized clinical scales. Recordings and transcripts were processed using an automated pipeline to extract acoustic and textual features. We used binomial, elastic net, machine learning models to predict delirium status.

Results: We included 33 older adults admitted to hospital, of whom 10 met criteria for delirium. The group with delirium scored higher on total language disturbances and incoherence, and lower on category fluency. Both groups scored lower on category fluency than the normative population. Cognitive dysfunction as a continuous measure was correlated with higher total language disturbance, incoherence, loss of goal and lower category fluency. Including computational language features in the model predicting delirium status increased accuracy to 78%.

Limitations: This was a proof-of-concept study with limited sample size, without a set-aside cross-validation sample. Subsequent studies are needed before establishing a generalizable model for detecting delirium.

Conclusion: Language impairments were elevated among patients with delirium and may also be used to identify subthreshold cognitive disturbances. Computational speech and language features are promising as accurate, noninvasive and efficient biomarkers of delirium.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
51
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience publishes papers at the intersection of psychiatry and neuroscience that advance our understanding of the neural mechanisms involved in the etiology and treatment of psychiatric disorders. This includes studies on patients with psychiatric disorders, healthy humans, and experimental animals as well as studies in vitro. Original research articles, including clinical trials with a mechanistic component, and review papers will be considered.
期刊最新文献
Decreased temporal variabilities of functional connectivities in insula and lingual gyrus are associated with better early treatment response in patients with panic disorder. Glutamate levels and symptom burden in high-risk and first-episode schizophrenia: a dual-voxel study of the anterior cingulate cortex. Altered neural activities during emotion regulation in depression: a meta-analysis. Beyond mood - depression as a speed disorder: biomarkers for abnormal slowness. Structural-informed functional MRI analysis of patients with empathy impairment following stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1