关于寨卡病毒的声音:在不断演变的流行病中生殖自主和共同决策

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Womens Health Issues Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.whi.2022.11.005
Paula Latortue-Albino MD , Stephanie Delgado MD , Rebecca Perkins MD, MSc , Christina Yarrington MD , Pooja Mehta MD, MSHP
{"title":"关于寨卡病毒的声音:在不断演变的流行病中生殖自主和共同决策","authors":"Paula Latortue-Albino MD ,&nbsp;Stephanie Delgado MD ,&nbsp;Rebecca Perkins MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Christina Yarrington MD ,&nbsp;Pooja Mehta MD, MSHP","doi":"10.1016/j.whi.2022.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>We aimed to understand the degree to which pregnant individuals exposed to emerging infections, such as Zika, are engaged by providers in shared decision-making and explore potential barriers to inform strategies to improve care for those most at risk for inequities. Studies have demonstrated that Latinx and Black people are less likely to engage in shared decision-making and are less engaged by providers. Limited research explores factors impacting shared decision-making in prenatal care and in the setting of recent epidemics.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>We conducted an<span><span> exploratory qualitative study of individuals eligible for </span>prenatal screening owing to Zika exposure during pregnancy. Given an established connection between </span></span>autonomy<span><span><span> and shared decision-making, we used the Reproductive Autonomy Scale and the Three Talk Model for shared decision-making to inform our semistructured interview guide. Interviews were conducted in Spanish or English. and participants were recruited from a federally qualified health center and a tertiary care </span>obstetric clinic until thematic saturation was achieved. Interviews were recorded, translated, and transcribed and two coders used modified </span>grounded theory to generate themes.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We interviewed 18 participants from May to December 2017. Participant narratives demonstrated reproductive autonomy in pregnancy decision-making, with decision support from families, fatalism in pregnancy planning, and limited engagement by providers around decisions and implications of Zika virus testing. Hierarchy in provider dynamics, perceived stigma around emigration and travel, and language barriers impacted participant engagement in shared decision-making.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Participants demonstrated personal autonomy in reproductive decision-making, but demonstrated limited engagement in shared decision-making with regard to prenatal Zika testing. Provider promotion of shared decision-making using culturally centered decision tools to elicit underlying beliefs and deepen context for option, choice, and decision talk is critical in prenatal counseling to support equitable outcomes during evolving pandemics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48039,"journal":{"name":"Womens Health Issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Voices on Zika: Reproductive Autonomy and Shared Decision-Making During an Evolving Epidemic\",\"authors\":\"Paula Latortue-Albino MD ,&nbsp;Stephanie Delgado MD ,&nbsp;Rebecca Perkins MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Christina Yarrington MD ,&nbsp;Pooja Mehta MD, MSHP\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.whi.2022.11.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>We aimed to understand the degree to which pregnant individuals exposed to emerging infections, such as Zika, are engaged by providers in shared decision-making and explore potential barriers to inform strategies to improve care for those most at risk for inequities. Studies have demonstrated that Latinx and Black people are less likely to engage in shared decision-making and are less engaged by providers. Limited research explores factors impacting shared decision-making in prenatal care and in the setting of recent epidemics.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>We conducted an<span><span> exploratory qualitative study of individuals eligible for </span>prenatal screening owing to Zika exposure during pregnancy. Given an established connection between </span></span>autonomy<span><span><span> and shared decision-making, we used the Reproductive Autonomy Scale and the Three Talk Model for shared decision-making to inform our semistructured interview guide. Interviews were conducted in Spanish or English. and participants were recruited from a federally qualified health center and a tertiary care </span>obstetric clinic until thematic saturation was achieved. Interviews were recorded, translated, and transcribed and two coders used modified </span>grounded theory to generate themes.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We interviewed 18 participants from May to December 2017. Participant narratives demonstrated reproductive autonomy in pregnancy decision-making, with decision support from families, fatalism in pregnancy planning, and limited engagement by providers around decisions and implications of Zika virus testing. Hierarchy in provider dynamics, perceived stigma around emigration and travel, and language barriers impacted participant engagement in shared decision-making.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Participants demonstrated personal autonomy in reproductive decision-making, but demonstrated limited engagement in shared decision-making with regard to prenatal Zika testing. Provider promotion of shared decision-making using culturally centered decision tools to elicit underlying beliefs and deepen context for option, choice, and decision talk is critical in prenatal counseling to support equitable outcomes during evolving pandemics.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Womens Health Issues\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Womens Health Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049386722001414\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Health Issues","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049386722001414","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言我们旨在了解提供者在多大程度上参与共同决策,接触寨卡病毒等新发感染的孕妇,并探索潜在的障碍,为改善对最有可能出现不公平现象的人的护理提供策略。研究表明,拉丁裔和黑人不太可能参与共同决策,提供者也不太参与。有限的研究探讨了影响产前护理和近期流行病背景下共同决策的因素。方法我们对因妊娠期间接触寨卡病毒而符合产前筛查条件的个体进行了探索性定性研究。考虑到自主性和共享决策之间的既定联系,我们使用生殖自主性量表和共享决策的三语模型来为我们的半结构化访谈指南提供信息。访谈以西班牙语或英语进行。参与者是从联邦合格的卫生中心和三级护理产科诊所招募的,直到主题饱和。访谈被记录、翻译和转录,两名编码人员使用改良的基础理论来生成主题。结果2017年5月至12月,我们采访了18名参与者。参与者的叙述表明,在家庭的决策支持下,怀孕计划中的宿命论,以及提供者对寨卡病毒检测的决策和影响的有限参与下,怀孕决策中的生育自主性。提供者动态的层次结构、移民和旅行带来的耻辱感以及语言障碍影响了参与者参与共同决策。结论参与者在生殖决策中表现出个人自主性,但在产前寨卡病毒检测方面参与共同决策的程度有限。提供者使用以文化为中心的决策工具促进共同决策,以引出潜在的信念,并加深选择、选择和决策谈话的背景,这在产前咨询中至关重要,以支持在不断演变的流行病期间取得公平的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Voices on Zika: Reproductive Autonomy and Shared Decision-Making During an Evolving Epidemic

Introduction

We aimed to understand the degree to which pregnant individuals exposed to emerging infections, such as Zika, are engaged by providers in shared decision-making and explore potential barriers to inform strategies to improve care for those most at risk for inequities. Studies have demonstrated that Latinx and Black people are less likely to engage in shared decision-making and are less engaged by providers. Limited research explores factors impacting shared decision-making in prenatal care and in the setting of recent epidemics.

Methods

We conducted an exploratory qualitative study of individuals eligible for prenatal screening owing to Zika exposure during pregnancy. Given an established connection between autonomy and shared decision-making, we used the Reproductive Autonomy Scale and the Three Talk Model for shared decision-making to inform our semistructured interview guide. Interviews were conducted in Spanish or English. and participants were recruited from a federally qualified health center and a tertiary care obstetric clinic until thematic saturation was achieved. Interviews were recorded, translated, and transcribed and two coders used modified grounded theory to generate themes.

Results

We interviewed 18 participants from May to December 2017. Participant narratives demonstrated reproductive autonomy in pregnancy decision-making, with decision support from families, fatalism in pregnancy planning, and limited engagement by providers around decisions and implications of Zika virus testing. Hierarchy in provider dynamics, perceived stigma around emigration and travel, and language barriers impacted participant engagement in shared decision-making.

Conclusions

Participants demonstrated personal autonomy in reproductive decision-making, but demonstrated limited engagement in shared decision-making with regard to prenatal Zika testing. Provider promotion of shared decision-making using culturally centered decision tools to elicit underlying beliefs and deepen context for option, choice, and decision talk is critical in prenatal counseling to support equitable outcomes during evolving pandemics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Women"s Health Issues (WHI) is a peer-reviewed, bimonthly, multidisciplinary journal that publishes research and review manuscripts related to women"s health care and policy. As the official journal of the Jacobs Institute of Women"s Health, it is dedicated to improving the health and health care of all women throughout the lifespan and in diverse communities. The journal seeks to inform health services researchers, health care and public health professionals, social scientists, policymakers, and others concerned with women"s health.
期刊最新文献
A Mixed Methods Longitudinal Investigation of Maternal Depression Across the Perinatal Period Among Mothers Who Gave Birth During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Exploring Consumer Preferences for Pharmacy Provision of Mifepristone in the Human-centered Design Discovery Phase. "Women's Lives Are on the Line, and Our Hands Are Tied": How Television Is Reckoning With a Post-Dobbs America. Women's Health Care Delivery and Coordination After Transitioning From One Electronic Health Record to Another: Perspectives From Staff in the Veterans Health Administration. Protective Factors Associated With Lower Likelihood of Injection Drug Use and Experiencing Overdose Among Incarcerated Women.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1