{"title":"日本急性及康复医院脑卒中患者区域临床路径满意度调查","authors":"Shinichi Wada, Yoshitaka Iwanaga, Yoko Sumita, Yusuke Sasahara, Koshiro Kanaoka, Hidehiro Takekawa, Satoshi Sumita, Yoshihiro Miyamoto","doi":"10.2490/prm.20230021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We collected opinions about the use of a stroke-specific regional clinical pathway for facilitating collaboration between acute and rehabilitation hospitals in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study surveys were administered in acute hospitals designated as primary stroke centers and certified by the Japan Stroke Association (n=961) and in rehabilitation hospitals affiliated with the Kaifukuki Rehabilitation Ward Association (n=1237). The survey collected information on interfacility collaboration when caring for patients admitted during the acute phase following non-traumatic stroke from April 2020 to March 2021. We examined the pathway's usefulness and challenges relative to facility type using the χ<sup>2</sup> test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 422 acute hospitals and 223 rehabilitation hospitals that responded to our survey, 259 (62.1%) acute hospitals and 164 (85.4%) rehabilitation hospitals used the pathway. Fewer rehabilitation hospitals than acute hospitals considered that the pathway was useful (52.0% vs. 63.8%, P=0.02). Fewer rehabilitation hospitals did not experience pathway-related problems when compared with acute hospitals (38.0% vs. 55.8%, P<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Personnel at rehabilitation hospitals were less satisfied with the regional clinical care pathway than those in acute hospitals. These results suggest that the current stroke-specific regional clinical pathway could be improved.</p>","PeriodicalId":74584,"journal":{"name":"Progress in rehabilitation medicine","volume":"8 ","pages":"20230021"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/df/0d/prm-8-20230021.PMC10338178.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Satisfaction Survey for Regional Clinical Pathway for Stroke Patients in Acute and Rehabilitation Hospitals in Japan.\",\"authors\":\"Shinichi Wada, Yoshitaka Iwanaga, Yoko Sumita, Yusuke Sasahara, Koshiro Kanaoka, Hidehiro Takekawa, Satoshi Sumita, Yoshihiro Miyamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.2490/prm.20230021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We collected opinions about the use of a stroke-specific regional clinical pathway for facilitating collaboration between acute and rehabilitation hospitals in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study surveys were administered in acute hospitals designated as primary stroke centers and certified by the Japan Stroke Association (n=961) and in rehabilitation hospitals affiliated with the Kaifukuki Rehabilitation Ward Association (n=1237). The survey collected information on interfacility collaboration when caring for patients admitted during the acute phase following non-traumatic stroke from April 2020 to March 2021. We examined the pathway's usefulness and challenges relative to facility type using the χ<sup>2</sup> test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 422 acute hospitals and 223 rehabilitation hospitals that responded to our survey, 259 (62.1%) acute hospitals and 164 (85.4%) rehabilitation hospitals used the pathway. Fewer rehabilitation hospitals than acute hospitals considered that the pathway was useful (52.0% vs. 63.8%, P=0.02). Fewer rehabilitation hospitals did not experience pathway-related problems when compared with acute hospitals (38.0% vs. 55.8%, P<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Personnel at rehabilitation hospitals were less satisfied with the regional clinical care pathway than those in acute hospitals. These results suggest that the current stroke-specific regional clinical pathway could be improved.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in rehabilitation medicine\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"20230021\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/df/0d/prm-8-20230021.PMC10338178.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in rehabilitation medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2490/prm.20230021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2490/prm.20230021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:我们收集了关于使用卒中特异性区域临床途径促进日本急性和康复医院之间合作的意见。方法:研究调查在经日本卒中协会认定为初级卒中中心的急性医院(n=961)和海福县康复病房协会附属的康复医院(n=1237)进行。该调查收集了2020年4月至2021年3月期间在照顾非创伤性中风急性期住院患者时的机构间合作信息。我们使用χ2检验检验了与设施类型相关的路径的有用性和挑战。结果:在422家急症医院和223家康复医院中,259家急症医院(62.1%)和164家康复医院(85.4%)采用了该路径。认为该途径有用的康复医院少于急症医院(52.0% vs. 63.8%, P=0.02)。结论:康复医院人员对区域临床护理路径的满意度低于急性医院人员对区域临床护理路径的满意度。这些结果表明,目前的脑卒中特异性区域临床途径可以得到改进。
Satisfaction Survey for Regional Clinical Pathway for Stroke Patients in Acute and Rehabilitation Hospitals in Japan.
Objectives: We collected opinions about the use of a stroke-specific regional clinical pathway for facilitating collaboration between acute and rehabilitation hospitals in Japan.
Methods: The study surveys were administered in acute hospitals designated as primary stroke centers and certified by the Japan Stroke Association (n=961) and in rehabilitation hospitals affiliated with the Kaifukuki Rehabilitation Ward Association (n=1237). The survey collected information on interfacility collaboration when caring for patients admitted during the acute phase following non-traumatic stroke from April 2020 to March 2021. We examined the pathway's usefulness and challenges relative to facility type using the χ2 test.
Results: Of 422 acute hospitals and 223 rehabilitation hospitals that responded to our survey, 259 (62.1%) acute hospitals and 164 (85.4%) rehabilitation hospitals used the pathway. Fewer rehabilitation hospitals than acute hospitals considered that the pathway was useful (52.0% vs. 63.8%, P=0.02). Fewer rehabilitation hospitals did not experience pathway-related problems when compared with acute hospitals (38.0% vs. 55.8%, P<0.01).
Conclusions: Personnel at rehabilitation hospitals were less satisfied with the regional clinical care pathway than those in acute hospitals. These results suggest that the current stroke-specific regional clinical pathway could be improved.