神经解剖学实验室实践考试格式符合通用的学习框架设计。

IF 5.2 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Anatomical Sciences Education Pub Date : 2023-07-17 DOI:10.1002/ase.2316
Rhea R. Kimpo, Barb Puder
{"title":"神经解剖学实验室实践考试格式符合通用的学习框架设计。","authors":"Rhea R. Kimpo,&nbsp;Barb Puder","doi":"10.1002/ase.2316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The traditional format for neuroanatomy lab practical exams involves stations with a time limit for each station and inability to revisit stations. Timed exams have been associated with anxiety, which can lead to poor performance. In alignment with the universal design for learning (UDL), <i>Timed Image Question</i> and <i>Untimed Image Question</i> exam formats were designed to determine which format supports student success, especially for those who performed poorly in the traditional format. Only the <i>Untimed Image Question</i> format allowed students to revisit questions. All three formats were administered in a randomized order within a course for three cohorts of medical students. When all students' scores were analyzed together, the type of format had no effect. However, when analyses were conducted only on students who performed poorly in the traditional format, the type of format had an effect. These students increased their score, on average, by at least one grade level in the <i>Untimed Image Question</i> format compared to the traditional format. Students who performed well in the traditional format maintained their A, on average, in the two new formats. More students indicated <i>Untimed Image Question</i> as their most preferred format after experiencing all three formats. Most students associated the inability to revisit questions with high levels of anxiety. A neuroanatomy lab exam format was therefore identified as consistent with the UDL framework such that all students, regardless of test anxiety levels, can equally demonstrate what they learned. This format allowed for unlimited time per question and ability to revisit questions.</p>","PeriodicalId":124,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Sciences Education","volume":"16 6","pages":"1046-1057"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A neuroanatomy lab practical exam format in alignment with the universal design for learning framework\",\"authors\":\"Rhea R. Kimpo,&nbsp;Barb Puder\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ase.2316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The traditional format for neuroanatomy lab practical exams involves stations with a time limit for each station and inability to revisit stations. Timed exams have been associated with anxiety, which can lead to poor performance. In alignment with the universal design for learning (UDL), <i>Timed Image Question</i> and <i>Untimed Image Question</i> exam formats were designed to determine which format supports student success, especially for those who performed poorly in the traditional format. Only the <i>Untimed Image Question</i> format allowed students to revisit questions. All three formats were administered in a randomized order within a course for three cohorts of medical students. When all students' scores were analyzed together, the type of format had no effect. However, when analyses were conducted only on students who performed poorly in the traditional format, the type of format had an effect. These students increased their score, on average, by at least one grade level in the <i>Untimed Image Question</i> format compared to the traditional format. Students who performed well in the traditional format maintained their A, on average, in the two new formats. More students indicated <i>Untimed Image Question</i> as their most preferred format after experiencing all three formats. Most students associated the inability to revisit questions with high levels of anxiety. A neuroanatomy lab exam format was therefore identified as consistent with the UDL framework such that all students, regardless of test anxiety levels, can equally demonstrate what they learned. This format allowed for unlimited time per question and ability to revisit questions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anatomical Sciences Education\",\"volume\":\"16 6\",\"pages\":\"1046-1057\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anatomical Sciences Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ase.2316\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomical Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ase.2316","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

神经解剖学实验室实践考试的传统形式包括工作站,每个工作站都有时间限制,并且无法重新访问工作站。定时考试与焦虑有关,焦虑会导致成绩不佳。根据通用学习设计(UDL),定时图像问题和无标题图像问题考试格式旨在确定哪种格式支持学生成功,尤其是对于那些在传统格式中表现不佳的学生。只有“无标题图像问题”格式允许学生重新审视问题。这三种形式都是在一个针对三组医学生的课程中以随机顺序进行的。当所有学生的分数一起分析时,格式的类型没有影响。然而,当只对在传统形式中表现不佳的学生进行分析时,这种形式会产生影响。与传统格式相比,这些学生在无标题图像问题格式中的得分平均提高了至少一个年级。在传统形式中表现良好的学生在两种新形式中平均保持了A。更多的学生在体验了这三种格式后,表示无标题图像问题是他们最喜欢的格式。大多数学生将无法重新审视问题与高度焦虑联系在一起。因此,神经解剖学实验室考试的形式被确定为与UDL框架一致,这样所有学生,无论考试焦虑程度如何,都可以平等地展示他们所学到的东西。这种格式允许每个问题有无限的时间,并且可以重新访问问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A neuroanatomy lab practical exam format in alignment with the universal design for learning framework

The traditional format for neuroanatomy lab practical exams involves stations with a time limit for each station and inability to revisit stations. Timed exams have been associated with anxiety, which can lead to poor performance. In alignment with the universal design for learning (UDL), Timed Image Question and Untimed Image Question exam formats were designed to determine which format supports student success, especially for those who performed poorly in the traditional format. Only the Untimed Image Question format allowed students to revisit questions. All three formats were administered in a randomized order within a course for three cohorts of medical students. When all students' scores were analyzed together, the type of format had no effect. However, when analyses were conducted only on students who performed poorly in the traditional format, the type of format had an effect. These students increased their score, on average, by at least one grade level in the Untimed Image Question format compared to the traditional format. Students who performed well in the traditional format maintained their A, on average, in the two new formats. More students indicated Untimed Image Question as their most preferred format after experiencing all three formats. Most students associated the inability to revisit questions with high levels of anxiety. A neuroanatomy lab exam format was therefore identified as consistent with the UDL framework such that all students, regardless of test anxiety levels, can equally demonstrate what they learned. This format allowed for unlimited time per question and ability to revisit questions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anatomical Sciences Education
Anatomical Sciences Education Anatomy/education-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
39.70%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Anatomical Sciences Education, affiliated with the American Association for Anatomy, serves as an international platform for sharing ideas, innovations, and research related to education in anatomical sciences. Covering gross anatomy, embryology, histology, and neurosciences, the journal addresses education at various levels, including undergraduate, graduate, post-graduate, allied health, medical (both allopathic and osteopathic), and dental. It fosters collaboration and discussion in the field of anatomical sciences education.
期刊最新文献
Refocusing graduate gross anatomy training: Curating future content experts. Anatomical Sciences Education Vol. 17, Issue 8, 2024 Cover Image Editorial Board and Table of Contents Comparing assisting technologies for proficiency in cardiac morphology: 3D printing and mixed reality versus CT slice images for morphological understanding of congenital heart defects by medical students. Effect of peer facilitation in anatomy small group curriculum on academic performance and retention: A pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1