经皮经导管关闭梗死后室间隔缺损:手术干预的另一种选择。

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY Interventional Cardiology Review Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.15420/icr.2023.01
Diarmaid Cadogan, Marwa Daghem, Mostafa Snosi, Lynne K Williams, Jonathan Weir-McCall, Patrick A Calvert, Joel P Giblett
{"title":"经皮经导管关闭梗死后室间隔缺损:手术干预的另一种选择。","authors":"Diarmaid Cadogan,&nbsp;Marwa Daghem,&nbsp;Mostafa Snosi,&nbsp;Lynne K Williams,&nbsp;Jonathan Weir-McCall,&nbsp;Patrick A Calvert,&nbsp;Joel P Giblett","doi":"10.15420/icr.2023.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Post-infarction ventricular septal defect is a mechanical complication of acute MI. The incidence of this complication is low in the primary percutaneous coronary intervention era. However, the associated mortality is very high at 94% with medical management alone. Open surgical repair or percutaneous transcatheter closure still has an in-hospital mortality >40%. Retrospective comparisons between both closure methods are limited by observation and selection bias. This review addresses the assessment and optimisation of patients prior to repair, the optimal timing of repair, and the limitations in current data. The review considers techniques for percutaneous closure, and finally considers the path that future research should take to improve outcomes for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":38586,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Cardiology Review","volume":"18 ","pages":"e19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/be/de/icr-18-e19.PMC10331564.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Percutaneous Transcatheter Closure of Post-infarction Ventricular Septal Defect: An Alternative to Surgical Intervention.\",\"authors\":\"Diarmaid Cadogan,&nbsp;Marwa Daghem,&nbsp;Mostafa Snosi,&nbsp;Lynne K Williams,&nbsp;Jonathan Weir-McCall,&nbsp;Patrick A Calvert,&nbsp;Joel P Giblett\",\"doi\":\"10.15420/icr.2023.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Post-infarction ventricular septal defect is a mechanical complication of acute MI. The incidence of this complication is low in the primary percutaneous coronary intervention era. However, the associated mortality is very high at 94% with medical management alone. Open surgical repair or percutaneous transcatheter closure still has an in-hospital mortality >40%. Retrospective comparisons between both closure methods are limited by observation and selection bias. This review addresses the assessment and optimisation of patients prior to repair, the optimal timing of repair, and the limitations in current data. The review considers techniques for percutaneous closure, and finally considers the path that future research should take to improve outcomes for patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Cardiology Review\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"e19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/be/de/icr-18-e19.PMC10331564.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Cardiology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2023.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Cardiology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2023.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

梗死后室间隔缺损是急性心肌梗死的一种机械并发症,这种并发症在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时代的发生率较低。然而,单独进行医疗管理的相关死亡率非常高,高达94%。开放手术修复或经皮经导管闭合仍有>40%的住院死亡率。两种封闭方法之间的回顾性比较受到观察和选择偏倚的限制。这篇综述讨论了修复前患者的评估和优化,修复的最佳时机,以及当前数据的局限性。这篇综述考虑了经皮缝合的技术,最后考虑了未来研究应该采取的途径,以改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Percutaneous Transcatheter Closure of Post-infarction Ventricular Septal Defect: An Alternative to Surgical Intervention.

Post-infarction ventricular septal defect is a mechanical complication of acute MI. The incidence of this complication is low in the primary percutaneous coronary intervention era. However, the associated mortality is very high at 94% with medical management alone. Open surgical repair or percutaneous transcatheter closure still has an in-hospital mortality >40%. Retrospective comparisons between both closure methods are limited by observation and selection bias. This review addresses the assessment and optimisation of patients prior to repair, the optimal timing of repair, and the limitations in current data. The review considers techniques for percutaneous closure, and finally considers the path that future research should take to improve outcomes for patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Interventional Cardiology Review
Interventional Cardiology Review Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Wire Escalation And De-escalation Techniques in Antegrade and Retrograde Approaches to Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Training Culture Focus Group Position Statement: Bringing Trainees and Trainers Together. Atherectomy Techniques: Rotablation, Orbital and Laser. Outcomes and Complications of Mitral and Tricuspid Transcatheter Edge-to-edge Repair. New-generation Leadless Pacemaker Implantation: First Procedures in Central Asia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1