ziva - afliberept治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿:中央凹下脉络膜厚度与视觉和解剖结果的关系。

IF 1.6 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.18502/jovr.v18i2.13182
Siamak Moradian, Masoud Soheilian, Mahsan Asadi, Abdolreza Baghi, Hamid Safi, Seyed-Hossein Abtahi
{"title":"ziva - afliberept治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿:中央凹下脉络膜厚度与视觉和解剖结果的关系。","authors":"Siamak Moradian,&nbsp;Masoud Soheilian,&nbsp;Mahsan Asadi,&nbsp;Abdolreza Baghi,&nbsp;Hamid Safi,&nbsp;Seyed-Hossein Abtahi","doi":"10.18502/jovr.v18i2.13182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effects of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept injections (IVZ) on subfoveal choroidal thickness (SCT) as well as on central macular thickness (CMT) and on best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) changes in eyes with center-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-seven eyes of 36 patients with CI-DME were included in this prospective interventional case series. Structural optical coherence tomography (OCT) and enhanced depth imaging OCT were performed at baseline followed by three monthly 1.25 mg IVZ injections. Changes of SCT, CMT, and BCVA at each follow-up session were assessed. The association between baseline SCT and its monthly changes with final visual and anatomical outcomes were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CMT at baseline, and at the first, second, and third month follow-up sessions were 396 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 119, 344 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 115, 305 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 89, and 296 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 101 μm, respectively (<i>P</i>-value <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.001). SCT at baseline, and at months one, two, and three were 236 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 47, 245 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 56, 254 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 54, and 241 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 54 μm, respectively (<i>P</i>-value <math><mo>></mo></math> 0.99). Corresponding figures for BCVA were 0.58 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 0.29, 0.47 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 0.31, 0.4 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 0.24, and 0.37 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 0.23 LogMAR, respectively (<i>P</i>-value <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.001). There was a statistically significant positive correlation between BCVA and CMT changes following IVZ injections (<i>P</i>-value <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.001). However, there were no significant correlations between SCT changes and visual acuity (VA) and CMT changes following IVZ injections.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IVZ improved visual outcomes and macular thickness profiles in patients with CI-DME. However, IVZ had no significant effect on SCT. Baseline SCT and its monthly changes had no association with visual and anatomical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","volume":"18 2","pages":"164-169"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10172803/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ziv-aflibercept in Diabetic Macular Edema: Relation of Subfoveal Choroidal Thickness with Visual and Anatomical Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Siamak Moradian,&nbsp;Masoud Soheilian,&nbsp;Mahsan Asadi,&nbsp;Abdolreza Baghi,&nbsp;Hamid Safi,&nbsp;Seyed-Hossein Abtahi\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/jovr.v18i2.13182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effects of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept injections (IVZ) on subfoveal choroidal thickness (SCT) as well as on central macular thickness (CMT) and on best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) changes in eyes with center-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-seven eyes of 36 patients with CI-DME were included in this prospective interventional case series. Structural optical coherence tomography (OCT) and enhanced depth imaging OCT were performed at baseline followed by three monthly 1.25 mg IVZ injections. Changes of SCT, CMT, and BCVA at each follow-up session were assessed. The association between baseline SCT and its monthly changes with final visual and anatomical outcomes were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CMT at baseline, and at the first, second, and third month follow-up sessions were 396 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 119, 344 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 115, 305 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 89, and 296 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 101 μm, respectively (<i>P</i>-value <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.001). SCT at baseline, and at months one, two, and three were 236 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 47, 245 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 56, 254 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 54, and 241 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 54 μm, respectively (<i>P</i>-value <math><mo>></mo></math> 0.99). Corresponding figures for BCVA were 0.58 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 0.29, 0.47 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 0.31, 0.4 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 0.24, and 0.37 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 0.23 LogMAR, respectively (<i>P</i>-value <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.001). There was a statistically significant positive correlation between BCVA and CMT changes following IVZ injections (<i>P</i>-value <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.001). However, there were no significant correlations between SCT changes and visual acuity (VA) and CMT changes following IVZ injections.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IVZ improved visual outcomes and macular thickness profiles in patients with CI-DME. However, IVZ had no significant effect on SCT. Baseline SCT and its monthly changes had no association with visual and anatomical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research\",\"volume\":\"18 2\",\"pages\":\"164-169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10172803/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v18i2.13182\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v18i2.13182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价玻璃体内注射zivv -aflibercept (IVZ)对中央凹下脉络膜厚度(SCT)、中央黄斑厚度(CMT)和最佳矫正视力(BCVA)变化对中心受损伤型糖尿病黄斑水肿(CI-DME)的影响。方法:将36例CI-DME患者的57只眼纳入前瞻性介入病例系列。在基线时进行结构光学相干断层扫描(OCT)和增强深度成像OCT,随后每月注射三次1.25 mg IVZ。评估每次随访时SCT、CMT和BCVA的变化。基线SCT及其每月变化与最终视觉和解剖结果之间的关系也被评估。结果:基线时、随访第1、2、3个月时的CMT分别为396±119、344±115、305±89和296±101 μm (p值0.001)。基线和第1、2、3个月时SCT分别为236±47、245±56、254±54和241±54 μm (p值> 0.99)。BCVA的相应数值分别为0.58±0.29、0.47±0.31、0.4±0.24、0.37±0.23 LogMAR (p值0.001)。注射IVZ后BCVA与CMT变化呈正相关(p值0.001)。然而,注射IVZ后SCT变化与视力(VA)和CMT变化之间没有显著相关性。结论:IVZ改善了CI-DME患者的视力和黄斑厚度。然而,IVZ对SCT无显著影响。基线SCT及其每月变化与视觉和解剖结果无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ziv-aflibercept in Diabetic Macular Edema: Relation of Subfoveal Choroidal Thickness with Visual and Anatomical Outcomes.

Purpose: To evaluate the effects of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept injections (IVZ) on subfoveal choroidal thickness (SCT) as well as on central macular thickness (CMT) and on best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) changes in eyes with center-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME).

Methods: Fifty-seven eyes of 36 patients with CI-DME were included in this prospective interventional case series. Structural optical coherence tomography (OCT) and enhanced depth imaging OCT were performed at baseline followed by three monthly 1.25 mg IVZ injections. Changes of SCT, CMT, and BCVA at each follow-up session were assessed. The association between baseline SCT and its monthly changes with final visual and anatomical outcomes were also assessed.

Results: CMT at baseline, and at the first, second, and third month follow-up sessions were 396 ± 119, 344 ± 115, 305 ± 89, and 296 ± 101 μm, respectively (P-value < 0.001). SCT at baseline, and at months one, two, and three were 236 ± 47, 245 ± 56, 254 ± 54, and 241 ± 54 μm, respectively (P-value > 0.99). Corresponding figures for BCVA were 0.58 ± 0.29, 0.47 ± 0.31, 0.4 ± 0.24, and 0.37 ± 0.23 LogMAR, respectively (P-value < 0.001). There was a statistically significant positive correlation between BCVA and CMT changes following IVZ injections (P-value < 0.001). However, there were no significant correlations between SCT changes and visual acuity (VA) and CMT changes following IVZ injections.

Conclusion: IVZ improved visual outcomes and macular thickness profiles in patients with CI-DME. However, IVZ had no significant effect on SCT. Baseline SCT and its monthly changes had no association with visual and anatomical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Application of Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology: An Updated Comprehensive Review. Clinical Manifestations and Outcomes of Ocular Graft Versus Host Disease following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation. Clinical Outcomes of Stage 2 (Pivotal) Use of a Modified Keratoprosthesis Device (ORC-KPro) in Patients with End-stage Corneal Blindness. Doxycycline versus Curcumin for Inhibition of Matrix Metalloproteinase Expression and Activity Following Chemically Induced Inflammation in Corneal Cells. Evaluation of Foveal Vasculature by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography after Pan-Retinal Photocoagulation versus Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Injections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1