双相情感障碍孕妇使用锂后新生儿入院:一项回顾性队列研究

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY International Journal of Bipolar Disorders Pub Date : 2023-07-14 DOI:10.1186/s40345-023-00306-7
Noralie N Schonewille, Pleun A Terpstra, Maria E N van den Heuvel, Maria G Van Pampus, Odile A van den Heuvel, Birit F P Broekman
{"title":"双相情感障碍孕妇使用锂后新生儿入院:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"Noralie N Schonewille,&nbsp;Pleun A Terpstra,&nbsp;Maria E N van den Heuvel,&nbsp;Maria G Van Pampus,&nbsp;Odile A van den Heuvel,&nbsp;Birit F P Broekman","doi":"10.1186/s40345-023-00306-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lithium is the preferred treatment for pregnant women with bipolar disorders (BD), as it is most effective in preventing postpartum relapse. Although it has been prescribed during pregnancy for decades, the safety for neonates and obstetric outcomes are a topic of ongoing scientific debate as previous research has yielded contradicting outcomes. Our study aims to compare (re)admission rates and reasons for admissions in neonates born to women with bipolar disorders (BD) with and without lithium exposure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted in a Dutch secondary hospital (two locations in Amsterdam). Women with BD who gave birth after a singleton pregnancy between January 2011 and March 2021 and their neonates were included. Outcomes were obtained by medical chart review of mothers and neonates and compared between neonates with and without lithium exposure. The primary outcome was admission to a neonatal ward with monitoring, preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA), 5-minute Apgar scores, neonatal asphyxia, and readmission ≤ 28 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 93 women with BD, who gave birth to 117 live-born neonates: 42 (36%) exposed and 75 (64%) non-exposed to lithium. There were no significant differences in neonatal admission with monitoring (16.7 vs. 20.0%, p = 0.844). Additionally, preterm birth (7.1 vs. 5.3%), SGA (0.0 vs. 8.0%), 5-minute Apgar scores (means 9.50 vs. 9.51), neonatal asphyxia (4.8 vs. 2.7%) and readmission (4.8 vs. 5.3%) were comparable. Overall, 18.8% of BD offspring was admitted. Women with BD had high rates of caesarean section (29.1%), gestational diabetes (12.8%) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (8.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a sample of neonates all born to women with BD using various other psychotropic drugs, exposure to lithium was not associated with greater risk of neonatal admission to a ward with monitoring compared to non-exposure to lithium, questioning the necessity for special measures after lithium exposure. However, offspring of women with BD was admitted regularly and women with BD have high obstetric risk which require clinical and scientific attention.</p>","PeriodicalId":13944,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Bipolar Disorders","volume":"11 1","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10348961/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neonatal admission after lithium use in pregnant women with bipolar disorders: a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Noralie N Schonewille,&nbsp;Pleun A Terpstra,&nbsp;Maria E N van den Heuvel,&nbsp;Maria G Van Pampus,&nbsp;Odile A van den Heuvel,&nbsp;Birit F P Broekman\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40345-023-00306-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lithium is the preferred treatment for pregnant women with bipolar disorders (BD), as it is most effective in preventing postpartum relapse. Although it has been prescribed during pregnancy for decades, the safety for neonates and obstetric outcomes are a topic of ongoing scientific debate as previous research has yielded contradicting outcomes. Our study aims to compare (re)admission rates and reasons for admissions in neonates born to women with bipolar disorders (BD) with and without lithium exposure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted in a Dutch secondary hospital (two locations in Amsterdam). Women with BD who gave birth after a singleton pregnancy between January 2011 and March 2021 and their neonates were included. Outcomes were obtained by medical chart review of mothers and neonates and compared between neonates with and without lithium exposure. The primary outcome was admission to a neonatal ward with monitoring, preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA), 5-minute Apgar scores, neonatal asphyxia, and readmission ≤ 28 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 93 women with BD, who gave birth to 117 live-born neonates: 42 (36%) exposed and 75 (64%) non-exposed to lithium. There were no significant differences in neonatal admission with monitoring (16.7 vs. 20.0%, p = 0.844). Additionally, preterm birth (7.1 vs. 5.3%), SGA (0.0 vs. 8.0%), 5-minute Apgar scores (means 9.50 vs. 9.51), neonatal asphyxia (4.8 vs. 2.7%) and readmission (4.8 vs. 5.3%) were comparable. Overall, 18.8% of BD offspring was admitted. Women with BD had high rates of caesarean section (29.1%), gestational diabetes (12.8%) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (8.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a sample of neonates all born to women with BD using various other psychotropic drugs, exposure to lithium was not associated with greater risk of neonatal admission to a ward with monitoring compared to non-exposure to lithium, questioning the necessity for special measures after lithium exposure. However, offspring of women with BD was admitted regularly and women with BD have high obstetric risk which require clinical and scientific attention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Bipolar Disorders\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10348961/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Bipolar Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40345-023-00306-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Bipolar Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40345-023-00306-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:锂是孕妇双相情感障碍(BD)的首选治疗方法,因为它对预防产后复发最有效。尽管数十年来一直在怀孕期间开处方,但由于先前的研究得出了相互矛盾的结果,因此对新生儿和产科结果的安全性一直是科学辩论的主题。我们的研究旨在比较有锂暴露和没有锂暴露的双相情感障碍(BD)妇女所生的新生儿(再)入院率和入院原因。方法:在荷兰一家二级医院(阿姆斯特丹的两个地点)进行回顾性观察队列研究。研究对象包括2011年1月至2021年3月期间单胎妊娠后分娩的双相障碍妇女及其新生儿。结果是通过对母亲和新生儿的医疗图表进行审查,并比较有和没有锂暴露的新生儿。主要结局是入院新生儿病房监测,早产,小于胎龄(SGA), 5分钟Apgar评分,新生儿窒息,再入院≤28天。结果:我们纳入了93名BD妇女,她们生下了117名活产新生儿:42名(36%)暴露于锂,75名(64%)未暴露于锂。两组新生儿入院监测无显著差异(16.7% vs. 20.0%, p = 0.844)。此外,早产(7.1 vs. 5.3%)、SGA (0.0 vs. 8.0%)、5分钟Apgar评分(平均值9.50 vs. 9.51)、新生儿窒息(4.8 vs. 2.7%)和再入院(4.8 vs. 5.3%)具有可比性。总体而言,18.8%的BD后代入院。患有BD的妇女剖腹产率高(29.1%),妊娠期糖尿病(12.8%)和妊娠期高血压疾病(8.5%)。结论:在使用各种其他精神药物的双相障碍妇女所生的新生儿样本中,与未暴露于锂的新生儿相比,暴露于锂与新生儿入院监测的风险无关,质疑锂暴露后采取特殊措施的必要性。然而,双相障碍妇女的后代经常住院,双相障碍妇女有很高的产科风险,需要临床和科学的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Neonatal admission after lithium use in pregnant women with bipolar disorders: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Lithium is the preferred treatment for pregnant women with bipolar disorders (BD), as it is most effective in preventing postpartum relapse. Although it has been prescribed during pregnancy for decades, the safety for neonates and obstetric outcomes are a topic of ongoing scientific debate as previous research has yielded contradicting outcomes. Our study aims to compare (re)admission rates and reasons for admissions in neonates born to women with bipolar disorders (BD) with and without lithium exposure.

Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted in a Dutch secondary hospital (two locations in Amsterdam). Women with BD who gave birth after a singleton pregnancy between January 2011 and March 2021 and their neonates were included. Outcomes were obtained by medical chart review of mothers and neonates and compared between neonates with and without lithium exposure. The primary outcome was admission to a neonatal ward with monitoring, preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA), 5-minute Apgar scores, neonatal asphyxia, and readmission ≤ 28 days.

Results: We included 93 women with BD, who gave birth to 117 live-born neonates: 42 (36%) exposed and 75 (64%) non-exposed to lithium. There were no significant differences in neonatal admission with monitoring (16.7 vs. 20.0%, p = 0.844). Additionally, preterm birth (7.1 vs. 5.3%), SGA (0.0 vs. 8.0%), 5-minute Apgar scores (means 9.50 vs. 9.51), neonatal asphyxia (4.8 vs. 2.7%) and readmission (4.8 vs. 5.3%) were comparable. Overall, 18.8% of BD offspring was admitted. Women with BD had high rates of caesarean section (29.1%), gestational diabetes (12.8%) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (8.5%).

Conclusions: In a sample of neonates all born to women with BD using various other psychotropic drugs, exposure to lithium was not associated with greater risk of neonatal admission to a ward with monitoring compared to non-exposure to lithium, questioning the necessity for special measures after lithium exposure. However, offspring of women with BD was admitted regularly and women with BD have high obstetric risk which require clinical and scientific attention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Bipolar Disorders
International Journal of Bipolar Disorders Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Bipolar Disorders is a peer-reviewed, open access online journal published under the SpringerOpen brand. It publishes contributions from the broad range of clinical, psychological and biological research in bipolar disorders. It is the official journal of the ECNP-ENBREC (European Network of Bipolar Research Expert Centres ) Bipolar Disorders Network, the International Group for the study of Lithium Treated Patients (IGSLi) and the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Bipolare Störungen (DGBS) and invites clinicians and researchers from around the globe to submit original research papers, short research communications, reviews, guidelines, case reports and letters to the editor that help to enhance understanding of bipolar disorders.
期刊最新文献
Search for surrogate markers to predict end stage kidney disease in long term lithium users. Brain 18FDG-PET pattern in cognitively impaired elderly patients with bipolar disorder. Dynamics of affect modulation in neurodevelopmental disorders (DynAMoND) - study design of a prospective cohort study. Association between a large change between the minimum and maximum monthly values of solar insolation and a history of suicide attempts in bipolar I disorder. Machine learning-driven simplification of the hypomania checklist-32 for adolescent: a feature selection approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1