Giulio Emilio Brancati, Abraham Nunes, Katie Scott, Claire O'Donovan, Pablo Cervantes, Paul Grof, Martin Alda
{"title":"双相情感障碍 I 和 II 的差异特征:对临床特征、病程和治疗反应的回顾性横断面评估。","authors":"Giulio Emilio Brancati, Abraham Nunes, Katie Scott, Claire O'Donovan, Pablo Cervantes, Paul Grof, Martin Alda","doi":"10.1186/s40345-023-00304-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The distinction between bipolar I and bipolar II disorder and its treatment implications have been a matter of ongoing debate. The aim of this study was to examine differences between patients with bipolar I and II disorders with particular emphasis on the early phases of the disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>808 subjects diagnosed with bipolar I (N = 587) or bipolar II disorder (N = 221) according to DSM-IV criteria were recruited between April 1994 and March 2022 from tertiary-level mood disorder clinics. Sociodemographic and clinical variables concerning psychiatric and medical comorbidities, family history, illness course, suicidal behavior, and response to treatment were compared between the bipolar disorder types.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bipolar II disorder patients were more frequently women, older, married or widowed. Bipolar II disorder was associated with later \"bipolar\" presentation, higher age at first (hypo)mania and treatment, less frequent referral after a single episode, and more episodes before lithium treatment. A higher proportion of first-degree relatives of bipolar II patients were affected by major depression and anxiety disorders. The course of bipolar II disorder was typically characterized by depressive onset, early depressive episodes, multiple depressive recurrences, and depressive predominant polarity; less often by (hypo)mania or (hypo)mania-depression cycles at onset or during the early course. The lifetime clinical course was more frequently rated as chronic fluctuating than episodic. More patients with bipolar II disorder had a history of rapid cycling and/or high number of episodes. Mood stabilizers and antipsychotics were prescribed less frequently during the early course of bipolar II disorder, while antidepressants were more common. We found no differences in global functioning, lifetime suicide attempts, family history of suicide, age at onset of mood disorders and depressive episodes, and lithium response.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Differences between bipolar I and II disorders are not limited to the severity of (hypo)manic syndromes but include patterns of clinical course and family history. Caution in the use of potentially mood-destabilizing agents is warranted during the early course of bipolar II disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":13944,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Bipolar Disorders","volume":"11 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10349025/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential characteristics of bipolar I and II disorders: a retrospective, cross-sectional evaluation of clinical features, illness course, and response to treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Giulio Emilio Brancati, Abraham Nunes, Katie Scott, Claire O'Donovan, Pablo Cervantes, Paul Grof, Martin Alda\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40345-023-00304-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The distinction between bipolar I and bipolar II disorder and its treatment implications have been a matter of ongoing debate. The aim of this study was to examine differences between patients with bipolar I and II disorders with particular emphasis on the early phases of the disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>808 subjects diagnosed with bipolar I (N = 587) or bipolar II disorder (N = 221) according to DSM-IV criteria were recruited between April 1994 and March 2022 from tertiary-level mood disorder clinics. Sociodemographic and clinical variables concerning psychiatric and medical comorbidities, family history, illness course, suicidal behavior, and response to treatment were compared between the bipolar disorder types.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bipolar II disorder patients were more frequently women, older, married or widowed. Bipolar II disorder was associated with later \\\"bipolar\\\" presentation, higher age at first (hypo)mania and treatment, less frequent referral after a single episode, and more episodes before lithium treatment. A higher proportion of first-degree relatives of bipolar II patients were affected by major depression and anxiety disorders. The course of bipolar II disorder was typically characterized by depressive onset, early depressive episodes, multiple depressive recurrences, and depressive predominant polarity; less often by (hypo)mania or (hypo)mania-depression cycles at onset or during the early course. The lifetime clinical course was more frequently rated as chronic fluctuating than episodic. More patients with bipolar II disorder had a history of rapid cycling and/or high number of episodes. Mood stabilizers and antipsychotics were prescribed less frequently during the early course of bipolar II disorder, while antidepressants were more common. We found no differences in global functioning, lifetime suicide attempts, family history of suicide, age at onset of mood disorders and depressive episodes, and lithium response.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Differences between bipolar I and II disorders are not limited to the severity of (hypo)manic syndromes but include patterns of clinical course and family history. Caution in the use of potentially mood-destabilizing agents is warranted during the early course of bipolar II disorder.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Bipolar Disorders\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10349025/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Bipolar Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40345-023-00304-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Bipolar Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40345-023-00304-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:躁郁症 I 和躁郁症 II 之间的区别及其对治疗的影响一直是一个争论不休的问题。方法:1994 年 4 月至 2022 年 3 月期间,从三级情绪障碍诊所招募了 808 名根据 DSM-IV 诊断标准被诊断为双相情感障碍 I(587 人)或双相情感障碍 II(221 人)的患者。研究人员比较了两种躁郁症患者的社会人口学和临床变量,包括精神病和内科合并症、家族史、病程、自杀行为以及对治疗的反应:结果:躁郁症 II 患者多为女性、老年、已婚或丧偶。躁郁症 II 与 "躁郁症 "出现较晚、首次(低)躁狂和接受治疗的年龄较高、单次发作后转诊的频率较低、锂治疗前发作次数较多有关。躁郁症 II 患者的一级亲属中有较高比例的人患有重度抑郁症和焦虑症。双相 II 型躁狂症的典型病程特征是抑郁起病、早期抑郁发作、多次抑郁复发和抑郁占主导地位;较少在起病时或早期病程中出现(低)躁狂或(低)躁狂-抑郁循环。终生临床病程被评为慢性波动性的多于发作性的。更多的躁郁症患者有快速循环和/或大量发作的病史。在双相情感障碍 II 的早期病程中,情绪稳定剂和抗精神病药物的使用频率较低,而抗抑郁药物的使用频率较高。我们发现,在整体功能、终生自杀未遂、家族自杀史、情绪障碍和抑郁发作的发病年龄以及锂盐反应等方面没有差异:双相情感障碍 I 和 II 之间的差异不仅限于(低)躁狂综合征的严重程度,还包括临床过程和家族史的模式。在双相情感障碍 II 的早期病程中,应谨慎使用潜在的情绪稳定剂。
Differential characteristics of bipolar I and II disorders: a retrospective, cross-sectional evaluation of clinical features, illness course, and response to treatment.
Background: The distinction between bipolar I and bipolar II disorder and its treatment implications have been a matter of ongoing debate. The aim of this study was to examine differences between patients with bipolar I and II disorders with particular emphasis on the early phases of the disorders.
Methods: 808 subjects diagnosed with bipolar I (N = 587) or bipolar II disorder (N = 221) according to DSM-IV criteria were recruited between April 1994 and March 2022 from tertiary-level mood disorder clinics. Sociodemographic and clinical variables concerning psychiatric and medical comorbidities, family history, illness course, suicidal behavior, and response to treatment were compared between the bipolar disorder types.
Results: Bipolar II disorder patients were more frequently women, older, married or widowed. Bipolar II disorder was associated with later "bipolar" presentation, higher age at first (hypo)mania and treatment, less frequent referral after a single episode, and more episodes before lithium treatment. A higher proportion of first-degree relatives of bipolar II patients were affected by major depression and anxiety disorders. The course of bipolar II disorder was typically characterized by depressive onset, early depressive episodes, multiple depressive recurrences, and depressive predominant polarity; less often by (hypo)mania or (hypo)mania-depression cycles at onset or during the early course. The lifetime clinical course was more frequently rated as chronic fluctuating than episodic. More patients with bipolar II disorder had a history of rapid cycling and/or high number of episodes. Mood stabilizers and antipsychotics were prescribed less frequently during the early course of bipolar II disorder, while antidepressants were more common. We found no differences in global functioning, lifetime suicide attempts, family history of suicide, age at onset of mood disorders and depressive episodes, and lithium response.
Conclusions: Differences between bipolar I and II disorders are not limited to the severity of (hypo)manic syndromes but include patterns of clinical course and family history. Caution in the use of potentially mood-destabilizing agents is warranted during the early course of bipolar II disorder.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Bipolar Disorders is a peer-reviewed, open access online journal published under the SpringerOpen brand. It publishes contributions from the broad range of clinical, psychological and biological research in bipolar disorders. It is the official journal of the ECNP-ENBREC (European Network of Bipolar Research Expert Centres ) Bipolar Disorders Network, the International Group for the study of Lithium Treated Patients (IGSLi) and the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Bipolare Störungen (DGBS) and invites clinicians and researchers from around the globe to submit original research papers, short research communications, reviews, guidelines, case reports and letters to the editor that help to enhance understanding of bipolar disorders.