慢性伤口。

IF 76.9 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Nature Reviews Disease Primers Pub Date : 2022-07-21 DOI:10.1038/s41572-022-00377-3
Vincent Falanga, Roslyn Rivkah Isseroff, Athena M Soulika, Marco Romanelli, David Margolis, Suzanne Kapp, Mark Granick, Keith Harding
{"title":"慢性伤口。","authors":"Vincent Falanga,&nbsp;Roslyn Rivkah Isseroff,&nbsp;Athena M Soulika,&nbsp;Marco Romanelli,&nbsp;David Margolis,&nbsp;Suzanne Kapp,&nbsp;Mark Granick,&nbsp;Keith Harding","doi":"10.1038/s41572-022-00377-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic wounds are characterized by their inability to heal within an expected time frame and have emerged as an increasingly important clinical problem over the past several decades, owing to their increasing incidence and greater recognition of associated morbidity and socio-economic burden. Even up to a few years ago, the management of chronic wounds relied on standards of care that were outdated. However, the approach to these chronic conditions has improved, with better prevention, diagnosis and treatment. Such improvements are due to major advances in understanding of cellular and molecular aspects of basic science, in innovative and technological breakthroughs in treatment modalities from biomedical engineering, and in our ability to conduct well-controlled and reliable clinical research. The evidence-based approaches resulting from these advances have become the new standard of care. At the same time, these improvements are tempered by the recognition that persistent gaps exist in scientific knowledge of impaired healing and the ability of clinicians to reduce morbidity, loss of limb and mortality. Therefore, taking stock of what is known and what is needed to improve understanding of chronic wounds and their associated failure to heal is crucial to ensuring better treatments and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":18910,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Disease Primers","volume":"8 1","pages":"50"},"PeriodicalIF":76.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10352385/pdf/nihms-1908297.pdf","citationCount":"83","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chronic wounds.\",\"authors\":\"Vincent Falanga,&nbsp;Roslyn Rivkah Isseroff,&nbsp;Athena M Soulika,&nbsp;Marco Romanelli,&nbsp;David Margolis,&nbsp;Suzanne Kapp,&nbsp;Mark Granick,&nbsp;Keith Harding\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41572-022-00377-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Chronic wounds are characterized by their inability to heal within an expected time frame and have emerged as an increasingly important clinical problem over the past several decades, owing to their increasing incidence and greater recognition of associated morbidity and socio-economic burden. Even up to a few years ago, the management of chronic wounds relied on standards of care that were outdated. However, the approach to these chronic conditions has improved, with better prevention, diagnosis and treatment. Such improvements are due to major advances in understanding of cellular and molecular aspects of basic science, in innovative and technological breakthroughs in treatment modalities from biomedical engineering, and in our ability to conduct well-controlled and reliable clinical research. The evidence-based approaches resulting from these advances have become the new standard of care. At the same time, these improvements are tempered by the recognition that persistent gaps exist in scientific knowledge of impaired healing and the ability of clinicians to reduce morbidity, loss of limb and mortality. Therefore, taking stock of what is known and what is needed to improve understanding of chronic wounds and their associated failure to heal is crucial to ensuring better treatments and outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Reviews Disease Primers\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":76.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10352385/pdf/nihms-1908297.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"83\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Reviews Disease Primers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-022-00377-3\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Disease Primers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-022-00377-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 83

摘要

慢性伤口的特点是无法在预期的时间范围内愈合,在过去几十年里,由于其发病率不断增加,人们对相关发病率和社会经济负担的认识越来越高,慢性伤口已成为一个日益重要的临床问题。甚至在几年前,慢性伤口的管理还依赖于过时的护理标准。然而,治疗这些慢性疾病的方法已经得到改善,预防、诊断和治疗都有所改善。这些改进是由于对基础科学的细胞和分子方面的理解取得重大进展,生物医学工程治疗方式的创新和技术突破,以及我们进行良好控制和可靠临床研究的能力。由这些进步产生的循证方法已成为新的护理标准。与此同时,由于认识到在损伤愈合的科学知识和临床医生减少发病率、肢体丧失和死亡率的能力方面存在持续的差距,这些改进受到了制约。因此,评估已知的情况和需要采取的措施,以提高对慢性伤口及其相关的无法愈合的理解,对于确保更好的治疗和结果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Chronic wounds.

Chronic wounds are characterized by their inability to heal within an expected time frame and have emerged as an increasingly important clinical problem over the past several decades, owing to their increasing incidence and greater recognition of associated morbidity and socio-economic burden. Even up to a few years ago, the management of chronic wounds relied on standards of care that were outdated. However, the approach to these chronic conditions has improved, with better prevention, diagnosis and treatment. Such improvements are due to major advances in understanding of cellular and molecular aspects of basic science, in innovative and technological breakthroughs in treatment modalities from biomedical engineering, and in our ability to conduct well-controlled and reliable clinical research. The evidence-based approaches resulting from these advances have become the new standard of care. At the same time, these improvements are tempered by the recognition that persistent gaps exist in scientific knowledge of impaired healing and the ability of clinicians to reduce morbidity, loss of limb and mortality. Therefore, taking stock of what is known and what is needed to improve understanding of chronic wounds and their associated failure to heal is crucial to ensuring better treatments and outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Reviews Disease Primers
Nature Reviews Disease Primers Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
76.70
自引率
0.20%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Nature Reviews Disease Primers, a part of the Nature Reviews journal portfolio, features sections on epidemiology, mechanisms, diagnosis, management, and patient quality of life. The editorial team commissions top researchers — comprising basic scientists and clinical researchers — to write the Primers, which are designed for use by early career researchers, medical students and principal investigators. Each Primer concludes with an Outlook section, highlighting future research directions. Covered medical specialties include Cardiology, Dermatology, Ear, Nose and Throat, Emergency Medicine, Endocrinology, Gastroenterology, Genetic Conditions, Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Hepatology, Haematology, Infectious Diseases, Maxillofacial and Oral Medicine, Nephrology, Neurology, Nutrition, Oncology, Ophthalmology, Orthopaedics, Psychiatry, Respiratory Medicine, Rheumatology, Sleep Medicine, and Urology.
期刊最新文献
Systemic capillary leak syndrome. Systemic capillary leak syndrome. Rett syndrome. Rett syndrome. Autoimmune haemolytic anaemias.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1