单侧人工耳蜗使用者无线语音测试的可行性。

IF 1.1 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Journal of Audiology and Otology Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.7874/jao.2023.00017
Seong Hoon Bae, Youngrak Jung, Ji Hye Hur, Jeong Ha Kim, Jae Young Choi
{"title":"单侧人工耳蜗使用者无线语音测试的可行性。","authors":"Seong Hoon Bae,&nbsp;Youngrak Jung,&nbsp;Ji Hye Hur,&nbsp;Jeong Ha Kim,&nbsp;Jae Young Choi","doi":"10.7874/jao.2023.00017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The speech tests used to evaluate language performance in patients with bilateral deafness (BiD) and cochlear implant (CI) are problematic if applied to patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) because normal ear hearing should be excluded. Thus, we investigated the feasibility of using wireless connection to evaluate speech intelligibility of the CI ear in patients with SSD. Subjects and.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with BiD and SSD were administered the word recognition scores (WRS) and speech intelligibility tests using an iPadbased wireless connection and conventional methods. To exclude normal side hearing in patients with SSD, masking noise and \"plugged and muffed\" method were used in the WRS and speech intelligibility tests, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In patients with BiD, the WRS and speech intelligibility tests results using wireless connection and conventional methods were similar. In patients with SSD, the WRS using masking noise in the normal hearing ear was similar to that of using wireless connection. However, 3 of 11 patients with SSD showed under-masked results if using the \"plugged and muffed\" method.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Speech intelligibility testing using wireless connection is a convenient and reliable method for evaluating CI performance in patients with SSD. The \"plugged and muffed\" method is not recommended for evaluating CI performance in patients with SSD.</p>","PeriodicalId":44886,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Audiology and Otology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fe/81/jao-2023-00017.PMC10352690.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of Speech Testing Using Wireless Connection in Single-Sided Cochlear Implant Users.\",\"authors\":\"Seong Hoon Bae,&nbsp;Youngrak Jung,&nbsp;Ji Hye Hur,&nbsp;Jeong Ha Kim,&nbsp;Jae Young Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.7874/jao.2023.00017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The speech tests used to evaluate language performance in patients with bilateral deafness (BiD) and cochlear implant (CI) are problematic if applied to patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) because normal ear hearing should be excluded. Thus, we investigated the feasibility of using wireless connection to evaluate speech intelligibility of the CI ear in patients with SSD. Subjects and.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with BiD and SSD were administered the word recognition scores (WRS) and speech intelligibility tests using an iPadbased wireless connection and conventional methods. To exclude normal side hearing in patients with SSD, masking noise and \\\"plugged and muffed\\\" method were used in the WRS and speech intelligibility tests, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In patients with BiD, the WRS and speech intelligibility tests results using wireless connection and conventional methods were similar. In patients with SSD, the WRS using masking noise in the normal hearing ear was similar to that of using wireless connection. However, 3 of 11 patients with SSD showed under-masked results if using the \\\"plugged and muffed\\\" method.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Speech intelligibility testing using wireless connection is a convenient and reliable method for evaluating CI performance in patients with SSD. The \\\"plugged and muffed\\\" method is not recommended for evaluating CI performance in patients with SSD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Audiology and Otology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fe/81/jao-2023-00017.PMC10352690.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Audiology and Otology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7874/jao.2023.00017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Audiology and Otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7874/jao.2023.00017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:用于评估双侧耳聋(BiD)和人工耳蜗(CI)患者语言表现的言语测试如果应用于单侧耳聋(SSD)患者是有问题的,因为正常耳听力应被排除在外。因此,我们研究了使用无线连接来评估SSD患者CI耳语音清晰度的可行性。主题和。方法:采用基于ipad的无线连接和常规方法对BiD和SSD患者进行单词识别评分(WRS)和语音清晰度测试。为排除SSD患者的正常侧听,在WRS和语音清晰度测试中分别采用屏蔽噪声和“插入和屏蔽”方法。结果:在BiD患者中,无线连接和常规方法的WRS和语音清晰度测试结果相似。在SSD患者中,在正常听力耳中使用掩蔽噪声的WRS与使用无线连接的WRS相似。然而,11例SSD患者中有3例使用“堵塞和套筒”方法时结果不明显。结论:无线连接语音清晰度测试是评估SSD患者CI性能的一种方便、可靠的方法。不推荐使用“堵塞和屏蔽”的方法来评估SSD患者的CI性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Feasibility of Speech Testing Using Wireless Connection in Single-Sided Cochlear Implant Users.

Background and objectives: The speech tests used to evaluate language performance in patients with bilateral deafness (BiD) and cochlear implant (CI) are problematic if applied to patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) because normal ear hearing should be excluded. Thus, we investigated the feasibility of using wireless connection to evaluate speech intelligibility of the CI ear in patients with SSD. Subjects and.

Methods: Patients with BiD and SSD were administered the word recognition scores (WRS) and speech intelligibility tests using an iPadbased wireless connection and conventional methods. To exclude normal side hearing in patients with SSD, masking noise and "plugged and muffed" method were used in the WRS and speech intelligibility tests, respectively.

Results: In patients with BiD, the WRS and speech intelligibility tests results using wireless connection and conventional methods were similar. In patients with SSD, the WRS using masking noise in the normal hearing ear was similar to that of using wireless connection. However, 3 of 11 patients with SSD showed under-masked results if using the "plugged and muffed" method.

Conclusions: Speech intelligibility testing using wireless connection is a convenient and reliable method for evaluating CI performance in patients with SSD. The "plugged and muffed" method is not recommended for evaluating CI performance in patients with SSD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Audiology and Otology
Journal of Audiology and Otology OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Journal of Audiology and Otology (JAO) (formerly known as Korean Journal of Audiology) aims to publish the most advanced findings for all aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear using state-of-the-art techniques and analyses. The journal covers recent trends related to the topics of audiology, otology, and neurotology conducted by professionals, with the goal of providing better possible treatment to people of all ages, from infants to the elderly, who suffer from auditory and/or vestibular disorders and thus, improving their quality of life. This journal encourages the submission of review papers about current professional issues, research papers presenting a scientific base and clinical application, and case papers with unique reports or clinical trials. We also invite letters to the editor and papers related to the manufacture and distribution of medical devices. This journal provides integrated views from otologists, audiologists, and other healthcare practitioners, offering readers high quality scientific and clinical information. This peer-reviewed and open access journal has been the official journal of the Korean Audiological Society since 1997 and of both the Korean Audiological Society and the Korean Otological Society since 2017. It is published in English four times a year in January, April, July, and October.
期刊最新文献
Does Cognitive Function Affect Performance and Listening Effort During Bilateral Wireless Streaming in Hearing Aid Users? Hearing Screening for Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review. How to Help Deaf Children Who Do Not Understand Their Vestibular Symptoms and Motor Disorders as Abnormal? Test-Retest Reliability of Tone Burst-Induced 500 Hz Air-Conduction Masseter Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential in Healthy Individuals. The Relationship Between Lower Vitamin D Levels and Hearing Loss in Older Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1