药物成瘾治疗中压力与退出的前瞻性生物-心理-社会重复测量研究。

IF 5.1 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2147/SAR.S376389
Kari Bøhle, Eli Otterholt, Stål Kapstø Bjørkly
{"title":"药物成瘾治疗中压力与退出的前瞻性生物-心理-社会重复测量研究。","authors":"Kari Bøhle,&nbsp;Eli Otterholt,&nbsp;Stål Kapstø Bjørkly","doi":"10.2147/SAR.S376389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This prospective, repeated-measures observational study tested biopsychosocial variables as risk factors for dropping out of inpatient substance addiction treatment. Substance use disorder (SUD) is viewed as a chronic relapsing disease caused by an interaction between biological, psychological, and social factors. However, there is a lack of prospective studies that combine biopsychosocial variables when assessing dropout. The aims of this study were to investigate whether there was 1) An association between biopsychosocial factors and dropping out of inpatient substance addiction treatment, 2) An interaction with SUD diagnosis and cortisol, and 3) Different dropout rates between short-term and long-term institutions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients (n = 173) were recruited from two inpatient treatment centers in Norway between 2018 and 2021. The following biopsychosocial variables were measured at four timepoints: ward atmosphere (Ward Atmosphere Scale, WAS), psychological distress (Hopkins Symptom Checklist 10, HSCL-10), motivation (M-scale of the Circumstances, Motivation, Readiness, and Suitability questionnaire), and concentration of salivary cortisol (CORT- nmol/L). Cortisol levels were measured for two consecutive days at each timepoint and calculated by two cortisol indices, daytime cortisol slope (DCS) and area under the curve with respect to the ground (AUC<sub>G</sub>). A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to find an association between dropout rates and the biopsychosocial variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results suggest a lower dropout odds for patients with high motivation (OR = 0.76, p = 0.022) and patients admitted to short-term treatment (OR = 0.06, p = 0.005). An interaction with stimulant SUD and DCS (OR = 13.74, p = 0.024) also revealed higher dropout odds. No statistical significance was found for psychological distress, WAS, and cortisol AUC<sub>G</sub>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results support monitoring motivation during treatment and further investigating biopsychosocial variables when assessing dropout risk together with SUD diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":22060,"journal":{"name":"Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cb/14/sar-14-61.PMC10351681.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Prospective Biopsychosocial Repeated Measures Study of Stress and Dropout from Substance Addiction Treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Kari Bøhle,&nbsp;Eli Otterholt,&nbsp;Stål Kapstø Bjørkly\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/SAR.S376389\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This prospective, repeated-measures observational study tested biopsychosocial variables as risk factors for dropping out of inpatient substance addiction treatment. Substance use disorder (SUD) is viewed as a chronic relapsing disease caused by an interaction between biological, psychological, and social factors. However, there is a lack of prospective studies that combine biopsychosocial variables when assessing dropout. The aims of this study were to investigate whether there was 1) An association between biopsychosocial factors and dropping out of inpatient substance addiction treatment, 2) An interaction with SUD diagnosis and cortisol, and 3) Different dropout rates between short-term and long-term institutions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients (n = 173) were recruited from two inpatient treatment centers in Norway between 2018 and 2021. The following biopsychosocial variables were measured at four timepoints: ward atmosphere (Ward Atmosphere Scale, WAS), psychological distress (Hopkins Symptom Checklist 10, HSCL-10), motivation (M-scale of the Circumstances, Motivation, Readiness, and Suitability questionnaire), and concentration of salivary cortisol (CORT- nmol/L). Cortisol levels were measured for two consecutive days at each timepoint and calculated by two cortisol indices, daytime cortisol slope (DCS) and area under the curve with respect to the ground (AUC<sub>G</sub>). A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to find an association between dropout rates and the biopsychosocial variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results suggest a lower dropout odds for patients with high motivation (OR = 0.76, p = 0.022) and patients admitted to short-term treatment (OR = 0.06, p = 0.005). An interaction with stimulant SUD and DCS (OR = 13.74, p = 0.024) also revealed higher dropout odds. No statistical significance was found for psychological distress, WAS, and cortisol AUC<sub>G</sub>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results support monitoring motivation during treatment and further investigating biopsychosocial variables when assessing dropout risk together with SUD diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cb/14/sar-14-61.PMC10351681.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/SAR.S376389\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/SAR.S376389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:这项前瞻性、重复测量的观察性研究测试了生物心理社会变量作为住院患者物质成瘾治疗退出的危险因素。物质使用障碍(SUD)被认为是一种由生物、心理和社会因素相互作用引起的慢性复发性疾病。然而,在评估辍学时,缺乏结合生物心理社会变量的前瞻性研究。本研究旨在探讨生物社会心理因素与住院物质成瘾患者退出治疗之间是否存在关联,与SUD诊断和皮质醇之间是否存在相互作用,以及短期和长期机构的辍学率是否存在差异。材料和方法:2018年至2021年间,从挪威的两个住院治疗中心招募患者(n = 173)。在四个时间点测量以下生物心理社会变量:病房气氛(病房气氛量表,WAS)、心理困扰(霍普金斯症状检查表10,HSCL-10)、动机(环境、动机、准备和适宜性问卷的m量表)和唾液皮质醇浓度(CORT- nmol/L)。在每个时间点连续两天测量皮质醇水平,并通过两个皮质醇指数,白天皮质醇斜率(DCS)和相对于地面的曲线下面积(AUCG)计算皮质醇水平。进行多变量逻辑回归分析以发现辍学率与生物心理社会变量之间的关联。结果:结果表明,高动机患者(OR = 0.76, p = 0.022)和接受短期治疗的患者(OR = 0.06, p = 0.005)的退出几率较低。与兴奋剂SUD和DCS的相互作用(OR = 13.74, p = 0.024)也显示出更高的退学几率。心理困扰、was和皮质醇AUCG均无统计学意义。结论:该结果支持在治疗过程中监测动机,并在评估退学风险时进一步研究生物心理社会变量,并结合SUD诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Prospective Biopsychosocial Repeated Measures Study of Stress and Dropout from Substance Addiction Treatment.

Introduction: This prospective, repeated-measures observational study tested biopsychosocial variables as risk factors for dropping out of inpatient substance addiction treatment. Substance use disorder (SUD) is viewed as a chronic relapsing disease caused by an interaction between biological, psychological, and social factors. However, there is a lack of prospective studies that combine biopsychosocial variables when assessing dropout. The aims of this study were to investigate whether there was 1) An association between biopsychosocial factors and dropping out of inpatient substance addiction treatment, 2) An interaction with SUD diagnosis and cortisol, and 3) Different dropout rates between short-term and long-term institutions.

Materials and methods: Patients (n = 173) were recruited from two inpatient treatment centers in Norway between 2018 and 2021. The following biopsychosocial variables were measured at four timepoints: ward atmosphere (Ward Atmosphere Scale, WAS), psychological distress (Hopkins Symptom Checklist 10, HSCL-10), motivation (M-scale of the Circumstances, Motivation, Readiness, and Suitability questionnaire), and concentration of salivary cortisol (CORT- nmol/L). Cortisol levels were measured for two consecutive days at each timepoint and calculated by two cortisol indices, daytime cortisol slope (DCS) and area under the curve with respect to the ground (AUCG). A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to find an association between dropout rates and the biopsychosocial variables.

Results: The results suggest a lower dropout odds for patients with high motivation (OR = 0.76, p = 0.022) and patients admitted to short-term treatment (OR = 0.06, p = 0.005). An interaction with stimulant SUD and DCS (OR = 13.74, p = 0.024) also revealed higher dropout odds. No statistical significance was found for psychological distress, WAS, and cortisol AUCG.

Conclusion: The results support monitoring motivation during treatment and further investigating biopsychosocial variables when assessing dropout risk together with SUD diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pharmacological Treatments for Methamphetamine Use Disorder: Current Status and Future Targets. Self-Reported Sobriety Labels: Perspectives from Alumni of Inpatient Addiction Treatment. Characteristics of Patients Presenting at an Emergency Department for a Heroin Overdose vs Detoxification. Managing Opioid Withdrawal Symptoms During the Fentanyl Crisis: A Review Transitioning Virtual-Only Group Therapy for Substance Use Disorder Patients to a Hybrid Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1