肝癌患者肝转移对免疫检查点抑制剂疗效的影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Clinical & Experimental Metastasis Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1007/s10585-023-10217-7
Bao-Wen Tian, Cheng-Long Han, Han-Chao Wang, Lun-Jie Yan, Zi-Niu Ding, Hui Liu, Xin-Cheng Mao, Jin-Cheng Tian, Jun-Shuai Xue, Long-Shan Yang, Si-Yu Tan, Zhao-Ru Dong, Yu-Chuan Yan, Dong-Xu Wang, Tao Li
{"title":"肝癌患者肝转移对免疫检查点抑制剂疗效的影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Bao-Wen Tian,&nbsp;Cheng-Long Han,&nbsp;Han-Chao Wang,&nbsp;Lun-Jie Yan,&nbsp;Zi-Niu Ding,&nbsp;Hui Liu,&nbsp;Xin-Cheng Mao,&nbsp;Jin-Cheng Tian,&nbsp;Jun-Shuai Xue,&nbsp;Long-Shan Yang,&nbsp;Si-Yu Tan,&nbsp;Zhao-Ru Dong,&nbsp;Yu-Chuan Yan,&nbsp;Dong-Xu Wang,&nbsp;Tao Li","doi":"10.1007/s10585-023-10217-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Liver metastasis is a frequent phenomenon in advanced tumor disease. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a new class of therapeutics that can improve the prognosis of cancer patients. The purpose of this study is to elucidate the relationship between liver metastasis and survival outcomes of patients receiving ICIs treatment. We searched four main databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were the survival outcomes of our concern. Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate the relationship between liver metastasis and OS/ PFS. Finally, 163 articles were included in the study. The pooled results showed that patients with liver metastasis receiving ICIs treatment had worse OS (HR=1.82, 95%CI:1.59-2.08) and PFS (HR=1.68, 95%CI:1.49-1.89) than patients without liver metastasis. The effect of liver metastasis on ICIs efficacy differed in different tumor types, and patients with urinary system tumors (renal cell carcinoma OS: HR=2.47, 95%CI:1.76-3.45; urothelial carcinoma OS: HR=2.37, 95%CI:2.03-2.76) had the worst prognosis, followed by patients with melanoma (OS: HR=2.04, 95%CI:1.68-2.49) or non-small cell lung cancer (OS: HR=1.81, 95%CI:1.72-1.91). ICIs efficacy in digestive system tumors (colorectal cancer OS: HR=1.35, 95%CI:1.07-1.71; gastric cancer/ esophagogastric cancer OS: HR=1.17, 95%CI:0.90-1.52) was less affected, and peritoneal metastasis and the number of metastases have a greater clinical significance than liver metastasis based on univariate data. For cancer patients receiving ICIs treatment, the occurrence of liver metastasis is associated with poor prognosis. Different cancer types and metastatic sites may hold a different prognostic effect on the efficacy of ICIs treatment in cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10267,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Experimental Metastasis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of liver metastasis on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients: a systemic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Bao-Wen Tian,&nbsp;Cheng-Long Han,&nbsp;Han-Chao Wang,&nbsp;Lun-Jie Yan,&nbsp;Zi-Niu Ding,&nbsp;Hui Liu,&nbsp;Xin-Cheng Mao,&nbsp;Jin-Cheng Tian,&nbsp;Jun-Shuai Xue,&nbsp;Long-Shan Yang,&nbsp;Si-Yu Tan,&nbsp;Zhao-Ru Dong,&nbsp;Yu-Chuan Yan,&nbsp;Dong-Xu Wang,&nbsp;Tao Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10585-023-10217-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Liver metastasis is a frequent phenomenon in advanced tumor disease. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a new class of therapeutics that can improve the prognosis of cancer patients. The purpose of this study is to elucidate the relationship between liver metastasis and survival outcomes of patients receiving ICIs treatment. We searched four main databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were the survival outcomes of our concern. Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate the relationship between liver metastasis and OS/ PFS. Finally, 163 articles were included in the study. The pooled results showed that patients with liver metastasis receiving ICIs treatment had worse OS (HR=1.82, 95%CI:1.59-2.08) and PFS (HR=1.68, 95%CI:1.49-1.89) than patients without liver metastasis. The effect of liver metastasis on ICIs efficacy differed in different tumor types, and patients with urinary system tumors (renal cell carcinoma OS: HR=2.47, 95%CI:1.76-3.45; urothelial carcinoma OS: HR=2.37, 95%CI:2.03-2.76) had the worst prognosis, followed by patients with melanoma (OS: HR=2.04, 95%CI:1.68-2.49) or non-small cell lung cancer (OS: HR=1.81, 95%CI:1.72-1.91). ICIs efficacy in digestive system tumors (colorectal cancer OS: HR=1.35, 95%CI:1.07-1.71; gastric cancer/ esophagogastric cancer OS: HR=1.17, 95%CI:0.90-1.52) was less affected, and peritoneal metastasis and the number of metastases have a greater clinical significance than liver metastasis based on univariate data. For cancer patients receiving ICIs treatment, the occurrence of liver metastasis is associated with poor prognosis. Different cancer types and metastatic sites may hold a different prognostic effect on the efficacy of ICIs treatment in cancer patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical & Experimental Metastasis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical & Experimental Metastasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-023-10217-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical & Experimental Metastasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-023-10217-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

肝转移是晚期肿瘤的常见现象。免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)是一类新的治疗药物,可以改善癌症患者的预后。本研究的目的是阐明肝转移与接受ICIs治疗的患者生存结局之间的关系。我们检索了四个主要数据库,包括PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane Library和Web of Science。总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)是我们关注的生存结局。采用风险比(HR)和95%可信区间(CI)评价肝转移与OS/ PFS的关系。最终,163篇文章被纳入研究。合并结果显示,肝转移患者接受ICIs治疗的OS (HR=1.82, 95%CI:1.59 ~ 2.08)和PFS (HR=1.68, 95%CI:1.49 ~ 1.89)均低于无肝转移患者。肝转移对ICIs疗效的影响在不同肿瘤类型中存在差异,泌尿系统肿瘤患者(肾细胞癌OS: HR=2.47, 95%CI:1.76 ~ 3.45;预后最差的是尿路上皮癌(OS: HR=2.37, 95%CI:2.03-2.76),其次是黑色素瘤(OS: HR=2.04, 95%CI:1.68-2.49)或非小细胞肺癌(OS: HR=1.81, 95%CI:1.72-1.91)。ICIs对消化系统肿瘤的疗效(结直肠癌OS: HR=1.35, 95%CI:1.07-1.71;胃癌/食管胃癌OS: HR=1.17, 95%CI:0.90-1.52)受影响较小,单因素数据显示腹膜转移及转移数比肝转移具有更大的临床意义。在接受ICIs治疗的癌症患者中,发生肝转移与预后不良相关。不同的癌症类型和转移部位可能对ICIs治疗癌症患者的疗效有不同的预后影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of liver metastasis on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Liver metastasis is a frequent phenomenon in advanced tumor disease. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a new class of therapeutics that can improve the prognosis of cancer patients. The purpose of this study is to elucidate the relationship between liver metastasis and survival outcomes of patients receiving ICIs treatment. We searched four main databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were the survival outcomes of our concern. Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate the relationship between liver metastasis and OS/ PFS. Finally, 163 articles were included in the study. The pooled results showed that patients with liver metastasis receiving ICIs treatment had worse OS (HR=1.82, 95%CI:1.59-2.08) and PFS (HR=1.68, 95%CI:1.49-1.89) than patients without liver metastasis. The effect of liver metastasis on ICIs efficacy differed in different tumor types, and patients with urinary system tumors (renal cell carcinoma OS: HR=2.47, 95%CI:1.76-3.45; urothelial carcinoma OS: HR=2.37, 95%CI:2.03-2.76) had the worst prognosis, followed by patients with melanoma (OS: HR=2.04, 95%CI:1.68-2.49) or non-small cell lung cancer (OS: HR=1.81, 95%CI:1.72-1.91). ICIs efficacy in digestive system tumors (colorectal cancer OS: HR=1.35, 95%CI:1.07-1.71; gastric cancer/ esophagogastric cancer OS: HR=1.17, 95%CI:0.90-1.52) was less affected, and peritoneal metastasis and the number of metastases have a greater clinical significance than liver metastasis based on univariate data. For cancer patients receiving ICIs treatment, the occurrence of liver metastasis is associated with poor prognosis. Different cancer types and metastatic sites may hold a different prognostic effect on the efficacy of ICIs treatment in cancer patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal''s scope encompasses all aspects of metastasis research, whether laboratory-based, experimental or clinical and therapeutic. It covers such areas as molecular biology, pharmacology, tumor biology, and clinical cancer treatment (with all its subdivisions of surgery, chemotherapy and radio-therapy as well as pathology and epidemiology) insofar as these disciplines are concerned with the Journal''s core subject of metastasis formation, prevention and treatment.
期刊最新文献
PD-L1 and VEGF dual blockade enhances anti-tumor effect on brain metastasis in hematogenous metastasis model. Efficacy and safety of PARPis combined with an ICIs for advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a single-arm meta-analysis. Cell blebbing novel therapeutic possibilities to counter metastasis. Targeting PADI2 as a potential therapeutic strategy against metastasis in oral cancer via suppressing EMT-mediated migration and invasion and CCL3/5-induced angiogenesis. Multiple myeloma: clinical characteristics, current therapies and emerging innovative treatments targeting ribosome biogenesis dynamics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1