帕金森氏症患者的步态冻结和评分:步态严重程度冻结工具的修订。

IF 1.5 Q3 REHABILITATION Physiotherapy Research International Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-18 DOI:10.1002/pri.2016
Aileen E Scully, Dawn Tan, Beatriz Ito Ramos de Oliveira, Keith D Hill, Ross Clark, Yong Hao Pua
{"title":"帕金森氏症患者的步态冻结和评分:步态严重程度冻结工具的修订。","authors":"Aileen E Scully,&nbsp;Dawn Tan,&nbsp;Beatriz Ito Ramos de Oliveira,&nbsp;Keith D Hill,&nbsp;Ross Clark,&nbsp;Yong Hao Pua","doi":"10.1002/pri.2016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>To improve existing clinical assessments for freezing of gait (FOG) severity, a new clinician-rated tool which integrates the varied types of freezing (FOG Severity Tool-Revised) was developed. This cross-sectional study investigated its validity and reliability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>People with Parkinson's disease who were able to independently ambulate eight-metres and understand study instructions were consecutively recruited from outpatient clinics of a tertiary hospital. Those with co-morbidities severely affecting gait were excluded. Participants were assessed with the FOG Severity Tool-Revised, three functional performance tests, the FOG Questionnaire, and outcomes measuring anxiety, cognition, and disability. The FOG Severity Tool-Revised was repeated for test-retest reliability. Exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha were computed for structural validity and internal consistency. Reliability and measurement error were estimated with ICC (two-way, random), standard error of measurement, and smallest detectable change (SDC<sub>95</sub> ). Criterion-related and construct validity were calculated with Spearman's correlations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-nine participants were enrolled [79.5% (n = 31) male; Median (IQR): age-73.0 (9.0) years; disease duration-4.0 (5.8) years], with fifteen (38.5%) who reported no medication state change contributing a second assessment for reliability estimation. The FOG Severity Tool-Revised demonstrated sufficient structural validity and internal consistency (α = 0.89-0.93), and adequate criterion-related validity compared to the FOG Questionnaire (ρ = 0.73, 95% CI 0.54-0.85). Test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.96, 95%CI 0.86-0.99) and random measurement error (%SDC<sub>95</sub>  = 10.4%) was acceptable in this limited sample.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>The FOG Severity Tool-Revised appeared valid in this initial sample of people with Parkinson's. While its psychometric properties remain to be confirmed in a larger sample, it may be considered for use in the clinical setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":47243,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Research International","volume":" ","pages":"e2016"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scoring festination and gait freezing in people with Parkinson's: The freezing of gait severity tool-revised.\",\"authors\":\"Aileen E Scully,&nbsp;Dawn Tan,&nbsp;Beatriz Ito Ramos de Oliveira,&nbsp;Keith D Hill,&nbsp;Ross Clark,&nbsp;Yong Hao Pua\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pri.2016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>To improve existing clinical assessments for freezing of gait (FOG) severity, a new clinician-rated tool which integrates the varied types of freezing (FOG Severity Tool-Revised) was developed. This cross-sectional study investigated its validity and reliability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>People with Parkinson's disease who were able to independently ambulate eight-metres and understand study instructions were consecutively recruited from outpatient clinics of a tertiary hospital. Those with co-morbidities severely affecting gait were excluded. Participants were assessed with the FOG Severity Tool-Revised, three functional performance tests, the FOG Questionnaire, and outcomes measuring anxiety, cognition, and disability. The FOG Severity Tool-Revised was repeated for test-retest reliability. Exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha were computed for structural validity and internal consistency. Reliability and measurement error were estimated with ICC (two-way, random), standard error of measurement, and smallest detectable change (SDC<sub>95</sub> ). Criterion-related and construct validity were calculated with Spearman's correlations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-nine participants were enrolled [79.5% (n = 31) male; Median (IQR): age-73.0 (9.0) years; disease duration-4.0 (5.8) years], with fifteen (38.5%) who reported no medication state change contributing a second assessment for reliability estimation. The FOG Severity Tool-Revised demonstrated sufficient structural validity and internal consistency (α = 0.89-0.93), and adequate criterion-related validity compared to the FOG Questionnaire (ρ = 0.73, 95% CI 0.54-0.85). Test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.96, 95%CI 0.86-0.99) and random measurement error (%SDC<sub>95</sub>  = 10.4%) was acceptable in this limited sample.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>The FOG Severity Tool-Revised appeared valid in this initial sample of people with Parkinson's. While its psychometric properties remain to be confirmed in a larger sample, it may be considered for use in the clinical setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Research International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e2016\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Research International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.2016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.2016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景和目的:为了改进现有的步态冻结(FOG)严重程度的临床评估,开发了一种新的临床医生评级工具,该工具集成了各种类型的冻结(修订后的FOG严重程度工具)。这项横断面研究调查了其有效性和可靠性。方法:从一家三级医院的门诊连续招募能够独立行走8米并理解研究说明的帕金森病患者。那些患有严重影响步态的合并症的患者被排除在外。参与者使用修订的FOG严重程度工具、三项功能表现测试、FOG问卷以及测量焦虑、认知和残疾的结果进行评估。为了重新测试可靠性,重复了修订的FOG严重性工具。探索性因素分析和Cronbachα计算结构有效性和内部一致性。可靠性和测量误差采用ICC(双向、随机)、标准测量误差和最小可检测变化(SDC95)进行估计。用Spearman相关性计算标准相关和结构有效性。结果:39名参与者被纳入[79.5%(n=31)男性;中位(IQR):年龄-73.0(9.0)岁;疾病持续时间-4.0(5.8)年],其中15名(38.5%)报告没有药物状态变化的参与者对可靠性评估进行了第二次评估。与FOG问卷相比,修订的FOG严重性工具证明了足够的结构有效性和内部一致性(α=0.89-0.93),以及足够的标准相关有效性(ρ=0.73,95%CI 0.54-0.85)。在这个有限的样本中,测试-再测试的可靠性(ICC=0.96,95%CI 0.86-0.99)和随机测量误差(%SDC95=10.4%)是可接受的。讨论和结论:修订的FOG严重程度工具在帕金森氏症患者的初始样本中似乎有效。虽然它的心理测量特性仍有待在更大的样本中确认,但它可以考虑在临床环境中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Scoring festination and gait freezing in people with Parkinson's: The freezing of gait severity tool-revised.

Background and purpose: To improve existing clinical assessments for freezing of gait (FOG) severity, a new clinician-rated tool which integrates the varied types of freezing (FOG Severity Tool-Revised) was developed. This cross-sectional study investigated its validity and reliability.

Methods: People with Parkinson's disease who were able to independently ambulate eight-metres and understand study instructions were consecutively recruited from outpatient clinics of a tertiary hospital. Those with co-morbidities severely affecting gait were excluded. Participants were assessed with the FOG Severity Tool-Revised, three functional performance tests, the FOG Questionnaire, and outcomes measuring anxiety, cognition, and disability. The FOG Severity Tool-Revised was repeated for test-retest reliability. Exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha were computed for structural validity and internal consistency. Reliability and measurement error were estimated with ICC (two-way, random), standard error of measurement, and smallest detectable change (SDC95 ). Criterion-related and construct validity were calculated with Spearman's correlations.

Results: Thirty-nine participants were enrolled [79.5% (n = 31) male; Median (IQR): age-73.0 (9.0) years; disease duration-4.0 (5.8) years], with fifteen (38.5%) who reported no medication state change contributing a second assessment for reliability estimation. The FOG Severity Tool-Revised demonstrated sufficient structural validity and internal consistency (α = 0.89-0.93), and adequate criterion-related validity compared to the FOG Questionnaire (ρ = 0.73, 95% CI 0.54-0.85). Test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.96, 95%CI 0.86-0.99) and random measurement error (%SDC95  = 10.4%) was acceptable in this limited sample.

Discussion and conclusions: The FOG Severity Tool-Revised appeared valid in this initial sample of people with Parkinson's. While its psychometric properties remain to be confirmed in a larger sample, it may be considered for use in the clinical setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Physiotherapy Research International is an international peer reviewed journal dedicated to the exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to specialist areas of physiotherapy theory, practice, and research. Our aim is to promote a high level of scholarship and build on the current evidence base to inform the advancement of the physiotherapy profession. We publish original research on a wide range of topics e.g. Primary research testing new physiotherapy treatments; methodological research; measurement and outcome research and qualitative research of interest to researchers, clinicians and educators. Further, we aim to publish high quality papers that represent the range of cultures and settings where physiotherapy services are delivered. We attract a wide readership from physiotherapists and others working in diverse clinical and academic settings. We aim to promote an international debate amongst the profession about current best evidence based practice. Papers are directed primarily towards the physiotherapy profession, but can be relevant to a wide range of professional groups. The growth of interdisciplinary research is also key to our aims and scope, and we encourage relevant submissions from other professional groups. The journal actively encourages submissions which utilise a breadth of different methodologies and research designs to facilitate addressing key questions related to the physiotherapy practice. PRI seeks to encourage good quality topical debates on a range of relevant issues and promote critical reflection on decision making and implementation of physiotherapy interventions.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Medical Rehabilitation Needs of 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Victims: Adıyaman Example. Efficacy of whole body vibration on fascicle length and joint angle in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Efficacy of Action Observation Therapy on Gait, Balance and Mobility Impairments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Reliability, Concurrent Validity, Responsiveness and Measurement Error of the Portuguese Version of Comprehensive Motor Coordination Scale in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease. Sexual Function and Quality of Life in Individuals Post Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1