耳蜗植入和双峰刺激对耳鸣的影响:一项跨国调查。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Acta Oto-Laryngologica Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1080/00016489.2023.2210618
Nicola Quaranta, David Baguley, Piero Fanizzi, Alessandra Murri, Vito Pontillo, Jodie Michelle Cutler, Giada Cavallaro
{"title":"耳蜗植入和双峰刺激对耳鸣的影响:一项跨国调查。","authors":"Nicola Quaranta,&nbsp;David Baguley,&nbsp;Piero Fanizzi,&nbsp;Alessandra Murri,&nbsp;Vito Pontillo,&nbsp;Jodie Michelle Cutler,&nbsp;Giada Cavallaro","doi":"10.1080/00016489.2023.2210618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tinnitus is a frequent symptom in cochlear implant (CI) patients. Many studies have shown that a CI leads to a significant change in the perception of tinnitus.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of CI on tinnitus in patients with Unilateral Cochlear Implant (UCI), Bilateral Cochlear Implant (BCI), and Bimodal Stimulation (BMS).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A survey was administered online to CI patients. The Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) score was calculated. Emotional, functional, and catastrophic subscales scores were calculated. The intensity and annoyance of tinnitus were graded using a scale from 1 to 10.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>130 participants represented the study group; the Average THI score was 38.3 (SD: 26.3) in UCI, 32.4 (SD 25.8) in BCI users, and 42.5 (SD 28.2) in BMS: no significant difference was found among the three groups. CI users for less than 1 year showed significantly higher THI scores compared to CI users for more than 5 years (<i>p</i> = .0275). The intensity and annoyance of tinnitus significantly decreased with the CI on compared to the CI off condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and significance: </strong>Taken together, our findings support CI's efficacy in reducing the perception of tinnitus. No significant differences were evident between unilateral and bilateral electrical stimulation in terms of tinnitus improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":6880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","volume":"143 6","pages":"476-480"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of cochlear implant and bimodal stimulation on tinnitus: a multinational survey.\",\"authors\":\"Nicola Quaranta,&nbsp;David Baguley,&nbsp;Piero Fanizzi,&nbsp;Alessandra Murri,&nbsp;Vito Pontillo,&nbsp;Jodie Michelle Cutler,&nbsp;Giada Cavallaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00016489.2023.2210618\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tinnitus is a frequent symptom in cochlear implant (CI) patients. Many studies have shown that a CI leads to a significant change in the perception of tinnitus.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of CI on tinnitus in patients with Unilateral Cochlear Implant (UCI), Bilateral Cochlear Implant (BCI), and Bimodal Stimulation (BMS).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A survey was administered online to CI patients. The Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) score was calculated. Emotional, functional, and catastrophic subscales scores were calculated. The intensity and annoyance of tinnitus were graded using a scale from 1 to 10.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>130 participants represented the study group; the Average THI score was 38.3 (SD: 26.3) in UCI, 32.4 (SD 25.8) in BCI users, and 42.5 (SD 28.2) in BMS: no significant difference was found among the three groups. CI users for less than 1 year showed significantly higher THI scores compared to CI users for more than 5 years (<i>p</i> = .0275). The intensity and annoyance of tinnitus significantly decreased with the CI on compared to the CI off condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and significance: </strong>Taken together, our findings support CI's efficacy in reducing the perception of tinnitus. No significant differences were evident between unilateral and bilateral electrical stimulation in terms of tinnitus improvement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Oto-Laryngologica\",\"volume\":\"143 6\",\"pages\":\"476-480\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Oto-Laryngologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2023.2210618\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2023.2210618","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:耳鸣是人工耳蜗(CI)患者的常见症状。许多研究表明,CI导致耳鸣感知的显著变化。目的:本研究的目的是评估CI对单侧人工耳蜗(UCI)、双侧人工耳蜗(BCI)和双峰刺激(BMS)患者耳鸣的影响。材料和方法:对CI患者进行在线调查。计算耳鸣障碍量表(THI)评分。计算情绪、功能和灾难分量表得分。耳鸣的强度和恼人程度用1到10分进行分级。结果:130名受试者代表研究组;UCI组THI平均评分为38.3 (SD: 26.3), BCI组为32.4 (SD: 25.8), BMS组为42.5 (SD: 28.2),三组间差异无统计学意义。使用CI少于1年的患者THI评分明显高于使用CI超过5年的患者(p = 0.0275)。与关闭耳鸣相比,打开耳鸣时耳鸣的强度和恼人程度显著降低。结论和意义:综上所述,我们的研究结果支持CI在减少耳鸣感觉方面的疗效。单侧和双侧电刺激在耳鸣改善方面无明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of cochlear implant and bimodal stimulation on tinnitus: a multinational survey.

Background: Tinnitus is a frequent symptom in cochlear implant (CI) patients. Many studies have shown that a CI leads to a significant change in the perception of tinnitus.

Aims: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of CI on tinnitus in patients with Unilateral Cochlear Implant (UCI), Bilateral Cochlear Implant (BCI), and Bimodal Stimulation (BMS).

Material and methods: A survey was administered online to CI patients. The Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) score was calculated. Emotional, functional, and catastrophic subscales scores were calculated. The intensity and annoyance of tinnitus were graded using a scale from 1 to 10.

Results: 130 participants represented the study group; the Average THI score was 38.3 (SD: 26.3) in UCI, 32.4 (SD 25.8) in BCI users, and 42.5 (SD 28.2) in BMS: no significant difference was found among the three groups. CI users for less than 1 year showed significantly higher THI scores compared to CI users for more than 5 years (p = .0275). The intensity and annoyance of tinnitus significantly decreased with the CI on compared to the CI off condition.

Conclusions and significance: Taken together, our findings support CI's efficacy in reducing the perception of tinnitus. No significant differences were evident between unilateral and bilateral electrical stimulation in terms of tinnitus improvement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Oto-Laryngologica
Acta Oto-Laryngologica 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Oto-Laryngologica is a truly international journal for translational otolaryngology and head- and neck surgery. The journal presents cutting-edge papers on clinical practice, clinical research and basic sciences. Acta also bridges the gap between clinical and basic research.
期刊最新文献
Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: predictors of recurrence 5 years after surgery. Extent of abscess development in cervical abscesses and pathogenic bacteria related to swallowing function. Narrow band imaging in oral cancer did not improve visualisation of the tumour borders: a prospective cohort study. Improved intracochlear biopolymeric drug delivery system: an in vivo study. Case-control study of otoconia proteins otolin-1 and otoconin-90 in patients with Meniere's disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1