妊娠期两个时间点上与妊娠糖尿病相关的表观遗传标记。

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Clinical Epigenetics Pub Date : 2023-07-06 DOI:10.1186/s13148-023-01523-8
Teresa Linares-Pineda, Nerea Peña-Montero, Nicolás Fragoso-Bargas, Carolina Gutiérrez-Repiso, Fuensanta Lima-Rubio, María Suarez-Arana, Antonio Sánchez-Pozo, Francisco J Tinahones, María Molina-Vega, María José Picón-César, Christine Sommer, Sonsoles Morcillo
{"title":"妊娠期两个时间点上与妊娠糖尿病相关的表观遗传标记。","authors":"Teresa Linares-Pineda, Nerea Peña-Montero, Nicolás Fragoso-Bargas, Carolina Gutiérrez-Repiso, Fuensanta Lima-Rubio, María Suarez-Arana, Antonio Sánchez-Pozo, Francisco J Tinahones, María Molina-Vega, María José Picón-César, Christine Sommer, Sonsoles Morcillo","doi":"10.1186/s13148-023-01523-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An adverse intrauterine or periconceptional environment, such as hyperglycemia during pregnancy, can affect the DNA methylation pattern both in mothers and their offspring. In this study, we explored the epigenetic profile in maternal peripheral blood samples through pregnancy to find potential epigenetic biomarkers for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), as well as candidate genes involved in GDM development. We performed an epigenome-wide association study in maternal peripheral blood samples in 32 pregnant women (16 with GDM and 16 non-GDM) at pregnancy week 24-28 and 36-38. Biochemical, anthropometric, and obstetrical variables were collected from all the participants. The main results were validated in an independent cohort with different ethnic origin (European = 307; South Asians = 165). Two hundred and seventy-two CpGs sites remained significantly different between GDM and non-GDM pregnant women across two time points during pregnancy. The significant CpG sites were related to pathways associated with type I diabetes mellitus, insulin resistance and secretion. Cg01459453 (SELP gene) was the most differentiated in the GDM group versus non-GDM (73.6 vs. 60.9, p = 1.06E-11; FDR = 7.87E-06). Three CpG sites (cg01459453, cg15329406, and cg04095097) were able to discriminate between GDM cases and controls (AUC = 1; p = 1.26E-09). Three differentially methylated positions (DMPs) were replicated in an independent cohort. To conclude, epigenetic marks during pregnancy differed between GDM cases and controls suggesting a role for these genes in GDM development. Three CpGs were able to discriminate GDM and non-GDM groups with high specificity and sensitivity, which may be biomarker candidates for diagnosis or prediction of GDM.</p>","PeriodicalId":48652,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Epigenetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10324212/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epigenetic marks associated with gestational diabetes mellitus across two time points during pregnancy.\",\"authors\":\"Teresa Linares-Pineda, Nerea Peña-Montero, Nicolás Fragoso-Bargas, Carolina Gutiérrez-Repiso, Fuensanta Lima-Rubio, María Suarez-Arana, Antonio Sánchez-Pozo, Francisco J Tinahones, María Molina-Vega, María José Picón-César, Christine Sommer, Sonsoles Morcillo\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13148-023-01523-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>An adverse intrauterine or periconceptional environment, such as hyperglycemia during pregnancy, can affect the DNA methylation pattern both in mothers and their offspring. In this study, we explored the epigenetic profile in maternal peripheral blood samples through pregnancy to find potential epigenetic biomarkers for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), as well as candidate genes involved in GDM development. We performed an epigenome-wide association study in maternal peripheral blood samples in 32 pregnant women (16 with GDM and 16 non-GDM) at pregnancy week 24-28 and 36-38. Biochemical, anthropometric, and obstetrical variables were collected from all the participants. The main results were validated in an independent cohort with different ethnic origin (European = 307; South Asians = 165). Two hundred and seventy-two CpGs sites remained significantly different between GDM and non-GDM pregnant women across two time points during pregnancy. The significant CpG sites were related to pathways associated with type I diabetes mellitus, insulin resistance and secretion. Cg01459453 (SELP gene) was the most differentiated in the GDM group versus non-GDM (73.6 vs. 60.9, p = 1.06E-11; FDR = 7.87E-06). Three CpG sites (cg01459453, cg15329406, and cg04095097) were able to discriminate between GDM cases and controls (AUC = 1; p = 1.26E-09). Three differentially methylated positions (DMPs) were replicated in an independent cohort. To conclude, epigenetic marks during pregnancy differed between GDM cases and controls suggesting a role for these genes in GDM development. Three CpGs were able to discriminate GDM and non-GDM groups with high specificity and sensitivity, which may be biomarker candidates for diagnosis or prediction of GDM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Epigenetics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10324212/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Epigenetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-023-01523-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Epigenetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-023-01523-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不利的宫内或围产期环境,如孕期高血糖,会影响母亲及其后代的 DNA 甲基化模式。在这项研究中,我们探讨了孕期母体外周血样本的表观遗传学特征,以寻找妊娠糖尿病(GDM)的潜在表观遗传学生物标志物,以及参与 GDM 发生的候选基因。我们对 32 名孕妇(16 名 GDM 患者和 16 名非 GDM 患者)在妊娠第 24-28 周和第 36-38 周的母体外周血样本进行了表观遗传组关联研究。我们收集了所有参与者的生化、人体测量和产科变量。主要结果在不同种族(欧洲人 = 307;南亚人 = 165)的独立队列中得到了验证。272 个 CpGs 位点在 GDM 和非 GDM 孕妇怀孕期间的两个时间点上仍存在显著差异。这些重要的 CpG 位点与 I 型糖尿病、胰岛素抵抗和分泌相关的通路有关。Cg01459453(SELP 基因)在 GDM 组与非 GDM 组中的差异最大(73.6 vs. 60.9,p = 1.06E-11;FDR = 7.87E-06)。三个 CpG 位点(cg01459453、cg15329406 和 cg04095097)能够区分 GDM 病例和对照组(AUC = 1;p = 1.26E-09)。三个差异甲基化位置(DMPs)在一个独立队列中得到了重复。总之,妊娠期表观遗传标记在 GDM 病例和对照组之间存在差异,这表明这些基因在 GDM 的发展中发挥作用。有三个 CpGs 能够以较高的特异性和灵敏度区分 GDM 和非 GDM 组,它们可能是诊断或预测 GDM 的候选生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Epigenetic marks associated with gestational diabetes mellitus across two time points during pregnancy.

An adverse intrauterine or periconceptional environment, such as hyperglycemia during pregnancy, can affect the DNA methylation pattern both in mothers and their offspring. In this study, we explored the epigenetic profile in maternal peripheral blood samples through pregnancy to find potential epigenetic biomarkers for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), as well as candidate genes involved in GDM development. We performed an epigenome-wide association study in maternal peripheral blood samples in 32 pregnant women (16 with GDM and 16 non-GDM) at pregnancy week 24-28 and 36-38. Biochemical, anthropometric, and obstetrical variables were collected from all the participants. The main results were validated in an independent cohort with different ethnic origin (European = 307; South Asians = 165). Two hundred and seventy-two CpGs sites remained significantly different between GDM and non-GDM pregnant women across two time points during pregnancy. The significant CpG sites were related to pathways associated with type I diabetes mellitus, insulin resistance and secretion. Cg01459453 (SELP gene) was the most differentiated in the GDM group versus non-GDM (73.6 vs. 60.9, p = 1.06E-11; FDR = 7.87E-06). Three CpG sites (cg01459453, cg15329406, and cg04095097) were able to discriminate between GDM cases and controls (AUC = 1; p = 1.26E-09). Three differentially methylated positions (DMPs) were replicated in an independent cohort. To conclude, epigenetic marks during pregnancy differed between GDM cases and controls suggesting a role for these genes in GDM development. Three CpGs were able to discriminate GDM and non-GDM groups with high specificity and sensitivity, which may be biomarker candidates for diagnosis or prediction of GDM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Epigenetics
Clinical Epigenetics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Developmental Biology
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
150
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Epigenetics, the official journal of the Clinical Epigenetics Society, is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that encompasses all aspects of epigenetic principles and mechanisms in relation to human disease, diagnosis and therapy. Clinical trials and research in disease model organisms are particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
The association between prenatal famine, DNA methylation and mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Evaluation of commercial kits for isolation and bisulfite conversion of circulating cell-free tumor DNA from blood. Crosstalk between DNA methylation and hypoxia in acute myeloid leukaemia. Analysis of DNA methylation at birth and in childhood reveals changes associated with season of birth and latitude. Degradation of methylation signals in cryopreserved DNA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1