Lisa C Lindley, Melanie J Cozad, Radion Svynarenko, Jessica Keim-Malpass, Jennifer W Mack, Pamela S Hinds
{"title":"评估儿科同期临终关怀与标准临终关怀的成本效益。","authors":"Lisa C Lindley, Melanie J Cozad, Radion Svynarenko, Jessica Keim-Malpass, Jennifer W Mack, Pamela S Hinds","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using a sample of 18,152 pediatric hospice patients, this study assessed the cost-effectiveness of concurrent care over standard hospice care. Analysis of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios with bootstrapping simulations showed that concurrent care was more effective but at a higher cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":49725,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Economics","volume":"40 6","pages":"297-304"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10187639/pdf/nihms-1881115.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of pediatric concurrent versus standard hospice care.\",\"authors\":\"Lisa C Lindley, Melanie J Cozad, Radion Svynarenko, Jessica Keim-Malpass, Jennifer W Mack, Pamela S Hinds\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Using a sample of 18,152 pediatric hospice patients, this study assessed the cost-effectiveness of concurrent care over standard hospice care. Analysis of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios with bootstrapping simulations showed that concurrent care was more effective but at a higher cost.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Economics\",\"volume\":\"40 6\",\"pages\":\"297-304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10187639/pdf/nihms-1881115.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of pediatric concurrent versus standard hospice care.
Using a sample of 18,152 pediatric hospice patients, this study assessed the cost-effectiveness of concurrent care over standard hospice care. Analysis of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios with bootstrapping simulations showed that concurrent care was more effective but at a higher cost.
期刊介绍:
Nursing Economic$ advances nursing leadership in health care, with a focus on tomorrow, by providing information and thoughtful analyses of current and emerging best practices in health care management, economics, and policymaking. The journal supports nurse leaders and others who are responsible for directing nursing''s impact on health care cost and quality outcomes. The journal is published six times per year.