Comment on "Proposal for a modified classification of isolated zygomatic arch fractures".

143 Ltter To the Editor: We read with interest the article by Jung et al. [1], entitled “Proposal for a modified classification of isolated zygomatic arch fractures,” in which existing classifications for zygomatic arch fractures are compared and a new functional tool for clinical and research purposes in the field of maxillofacial traumatology is proposed. As stated by the authors, a textbook classification of zygomatic fractures has not yet been established. Recent systematic reviews have highlighted the existence of considerable variation in classifications, outcome definitions and data collection; therefore, there is an urgent need for standardization to provide high-quality data [2]. In particular, no consensus exists regarding the treatment strategy or the best surgical approaches, including the number and modality of open-access reductions and internal fixations. To overcome these limits, in our opinion, a useful grading system should be applied more clearly to evaluate the outcomes of interventions, which appear to be a neglected aspect in the current classifications [1]. Radiology, particularly computed tomography (CT), is an important tool in maxillofacial surgical planning and postoperative evaluation. CT scans can provide detailed images of the bones and soft tissues in the facial region, allowing surgeons to accurately plan and perform procedures [3]. In cases of zygomatic fractures, CT scans can be used to measure changes in the affected area after surgery. In the study of Wang et al. [4], standard maxillofacial CT was preliminarily applied using a specific region of interest (ROI) calculator to compare preand postoperative zygomatic measures; this technique was shown to be sensitive enough to detect significant differences on the fractured side and nonsignificant differences on the healthy side in five patients. Moreover, computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) tools, derived from orthognathic surgery, have been proposed in the recent guidelines of the Chinese Stomatological Association to compare the preoperative and postoperative results of zygomatic fractures. These tools may provide even greater accuracy and precision in measuring changes in facial structures; thus, in the future, new interesting prospective data are expected [5]. Traditional CT scans are widely available in many healthcare settings and are considered to be relatively affordable, especially compared to other advanced imaging technologies such as magnetic resonance imaging or positron emission tomography. ROI calculators and CAD/CAM tools are more specialized technologies that may not be available in all healthcare settings; however, as this technology continues to evolve and become more widely adopted in the medical field, it is possible that these costs will steadily decrease. In addition, there may be opportunities to access these technologies through clinical research studies and collaborations with academic medical centers, which may provide access to advanced imaging and data analysis tools at considerably reduced costs. In conclusion, by providing detailed images of the facial bones and soft tissues, CT scans will help surgeons to accurately identify the location and extent of zygomatic fractures, as well as to plan the most effective surgical approach. Archives of Craniofacial Surgery