边缘可切除和局部晚期胰腺腺癌的化疗与化疗放疗。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Neoplasma Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.4149/neo_2023_230409N193
Soňa Argalácsová, Michal Vočka, Luboš Petruželka, Miroslav Ryska, Pavel Záruba, Zdeněk Krška, Vladimír Frýba, Jan Ulrych, Vladimír Černý, Tomáš Tůma, David Hoskovec
{"title":"边缘可切除和局部晚期胰腺腺癌的化疗与化疗放疗。","authors":"Soňa Argalácsová, Michal Vočka, Luboš Petruželka, Miroslav Ryska, Pavel Záruba, Zdeněk Krška, Vladimír Frýba, Jan Ulrych, Vladimír Černý, Tomáš Tůma, David Hoskovec","doi":"10.4149/neo_2023_230409N193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The role of radiotherapy in borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma (LAPC) remains controversial. In our study, we retrospectively evaluated 48 patients with BRPC (14; 29.2%) and LAPC (34; 70. 8%) who underwent 6-8 cycles of induction mFOLFIRINOX chemotherapy alone (23; 47.9%) or 4-6 cycles of mFOLFIRINOX followed by hypofractionated radiotherapy (up to the total dose of 39.9 Gy in 15 fractions) (25; 52.1%). Survival parameters were evaluated using the Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon Test and compared by using the long-rank test. The addition of radiotherapy was not associated with better survival (16.9 months for chemotherapy only versus 15.9 months for the combined therapy; p=0.486), as well as for both subgroups (13.5 months vs. 18.3 months; p=0.679) and (20.7 months vs. 13.8 months; p=0.425) for BRPC and LAPC, respectively. A higher resection rate was seen in the BRPC group compared to the LAPC group (43% vs. 17.6%, respectively). Our study revealed a significantly higher rate of lung metastases in patients after the combination therapy compared to those treated by chemotherapy only (19% vs. 0%, respectively; p=0.045). Such a borderline result, however, prevents us from drawing clear conclusions about whether this is an artifact caused by the low number of patients or whether radiotherapy leads to a selection of stem cells with a predilection to the generalization to the lungs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19266,"journal":{"name":"Neoplasma","volume":"70 3","pages":"468-475"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy in borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Soňa Argalácsová, Michal Vočka, Luboš Petruželka, Miroslav Ryska, Pavel Záruba, Zdeněk Krška, Vladimír Frýba, Jan Ulrych, Vladimír Černý, Tomáš Tůma, David Hoskovec\",\"doi\":\"10.4149/neo_2023_230409N193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The role of radiotherapy in borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma (LAPC) remains controversial. In our study, we retrospectively evaluated 48 patients with BRPC (14; 29.2%) and LAPC (34; 70. 8%) who underwent 6-8 cycles of induction mFOLFIRINOX chemotherapy alone (23; 47.9%) or 4-6 cycles of mFOLFIRINOX followed by hypofractionated radiotherapy (up to the total dose of 39.9 Gy in 15 fractions) (25; 52.1%). Survival parameters were evaluated using the Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon Test and compared by using the long-rank test. The addition of radiotherapy was not associated with better survival (16.9 months for chemotherapy only versus 15.9 months for the combined therapy; p=0.486), as well as for both subgroups (13.5 months vs. 18.3 months; p=0.679) and (20.7 months vs. 13.8 months; p=0.425) for BRPC and LAPC, respectively. A higher resection rate was seen in the BRPC group compared to the LAPC group (43% vs. 17.6%, respectively). Our study revealed a significantly higher rate of lung metastases in patients after the combination therapy compared to those treated by chemotherapy only (19% vs. 0%, respectively; p=0.045). Such a borderline result, however, prevents us from drawing clear conclusions about whether this is an artifact caused by the low number of patients or whether radiotherapy leads to a selection of stem cells with a predilection to the generalization to the lungs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neoplasma\",\"volume\":\"70 3\",\"pages\":\"468-475\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neoplasma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4149/neo_2023_230409N193\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neoplasma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4149/neo_2023_230409N193","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

放疗在边界可切除(BRPC)和局部晚期胰腺癌(LAPC)中的作用仍存在争议。在我们的研究中,我们对 48 例 BRPC(14 例,占 29.2%)和 LAPC(34 例,占 70.8%)患者进行了回顾性评估,这些患者接受了 6-8 个周期的 mFOLFIRINOX 诱导化疗(23 例,占 47.9%)或 4-6 个周期的 mFOLFIRINOX 诱导化疗后的低分次放疗(总剂量达 39.9 Gy,分 15 次进行)(25 例,占 52.1%)。采用Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon检验评估生存参数,并采用长秩检验进行比较。在BRPC和LAPC两个亚组中,加用放疗与更高的生存率无关(仅化疗为16.9个月,联合治疗为15.9个月;P=0.486),也与更高的生存率无关(分别为13.5个月vs.18.3个月;P=0.679)和(20.7个月vs.13.8个月;P=0.425)。与 LAPC 组相比,BRPC 组的切除率更高(分别为 43% 对 17.6%)。我们的研究显示,与仅接受化疗的患者相比,接受联合疗法的患者肺转移率明显更高(分别为 19% 对 0%;P=0.045)。然而,这种边缘性结果使我们无法得出明确的结论,即这是由于患者人数较少而造成的假象,还是放疗导致干细胞的选择偏向于转移到肺部。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy in borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

The role of radiotherapy in borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma (LAPC) remains controversial. In our study, we retrospectively evaluated 48 patients with BRPC (14; 29.2%) and LAPC (34; 70. 8%) who underwent 6-8 cycles of induction mFOLFIRINOX chemotherapy alone (23; 47.9%) or 4-6 cycles of mFOLFIRINOX followed by hypofractionated radiotherapy (up to the total dose of 39.9 Gy in 15 fractions) (25; 52.1%). Survival parameters were evaluated using the Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon Test and compared by using the long-rank test. The addition of radiotherapy was not associated with better survival (16.9 months for chemotherapy only versus 15.9 months for the combined therapy; p=0.486), as well as for both subgroups (13.5 months vs. 18.3 months; p=0.679) and (20.7 months vs. 13.8 months; p=0.425) for BRPC and LAPC, respectively. A higher resection rate was seen in the BRPC group compared to the LAPC group (43% vs. 17.6%, respectively). Our study revealed a significantly higher rate of lung metastases in patients after the combination therapy compared to those treated by chemotherapy only (19% vs. 0%, respectively; p=0.045). Such a borderline result, however, prevents us from drawing clear conclusions about whether this is an artifact caused by the low number of patients or whether radiotherapy leads to a selection of stem cells with a predilection to the generalization to the lungs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neoplasma
Neoplasma 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
238
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Neoplasma publishes articles on experimental and clinical oncology and cancer epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Six2 regulates the malignant progression and 5-FU resistance of hepatocellular carcinoma through the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway and DNMT1/E-cadherin methylation mechanism. Protein level of epithelial membrane protein (EMP) 1, EMP 2, and EMP 3 in carcinoma of unknown primary. The impact of c-Met inhibition on molecular features and metastatic potential of melanoma cells. The real-world comparison of non-small cell lung cancer survival outcomes depending on immunotherapy treatment and PD-L1 expression level. Albumin bound-paclitaxel combined with anlotinib and immunotherapy in the second-line treatment of ES-SCLC: a retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1