{"title":"生活在社会弱势地位的患者在团队式初级保健诊所就医的机会较少。","authors":"Nadia Deville-Stoetzel, Isabelle Gaboury, Jeannie Haggerty, Mylaine Breton","doi":"10.12927/hcpol.2023.27091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to explore differences in access to care as experienced by patients registered in team-based primary healthcare clinics according to their social vulnerability profile.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 1,562 patients from four team-based primary healthcare clinics completed an e-survey conducted between June and November 2021. The social vulnerability index was used to compare the experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with low vulnerability consulted at emergency rooms three times more often because their family physician was not available (<i>p</i> = 0.006) than patients with no vulnerability. Lack of continuity was reported two times more often by patients with low vulnerability related to team members not knowing their recent medical history (<i>p</i> = 0.006) and by patients with high vulnerability related to no one being in charge of their file (<i>p</i> = 0.023). Both vulnerable groups reported receiving contradictory information more often than patients with no vulnerability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with high vulnerability experienced more access difficulties related to continuity, interprofessional collaboration and communication with providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":39389,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 4","pages":"89-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/01/2e/policy-18-089.PMC10370394.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients Living with Social Vulnerabilities Experience Reduced Access at Team-Based Primary Healthcare Clinics.\",\"authors\":\"Nadia Deville-Stoetzel, Isabelle Gaboury, Jeannie Haggerty, Mylaine Breton\",\"doi\":\"10.12927/hcpol.2023.27091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to explore differences in access to care as experienced by patients registered in team-based primary healthcare clinics according to their social vulnerability profile.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 1,562 patients from four team-based primary healthcare clinics completed an e-survey conducted between June and November 2021. The social vulnerability index was used to compare the experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with low vulnerability consulted at emergency rooms three times more often because their family physician was not available (<i>p</i> = 0.006) than patients with no vulnerability. Lack of continuity was reported two times more often by patients with low vulnerability related to team members not knowing their recent medical history (<i>p</i> = 0.006) and by patients with high vulnerability related to no one being in charge of their file (<i>p</i> = 0.023). Both vulnerable groups reported receiving contradictory information more often than patients with no vulnerability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with high vulnerability experienced more access difficulties related to continuity, interprofessional collaboration and communication with providers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39389,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"18 4\",\"pages\":\"89-105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/01/2e/policy-18-089.PMC10370394.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2023.27091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2023.27091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patients Living with Social Vulnerabilities Experience Reduced Access at Team-Based Primary Healthcare Clinics.
Objective: This study aims to explore differences in access to care as experienced by patients registered in team-based primary healthcare clinics according to their social vulnerability profile.
Method: A total of 1,562 patients from four team-based primary healthcare clinics completed an e-survey conducted between June and November 2021. The social vulnerability index was used to compare the experiences.
Results: Patients with low vulnerability consulted at emergency rooms three times more often because their family physician was not available (p = 0.006) than patients with no vulnerability. Lack of continuity was reported two times more often by patients with low vulnerability related to team members not knowing their recent medical history (p = 0.006) and by patients with high vulnerability related to no one being in charge of their file (p = 0.023). Both vulnerable groups reported receiving contradictory information more often than patients with no vulnerability.
Conclusion: Patients with high vulnerability experienced more access difficulties related to continuity, interprofessional collaboration and communication with providers.