生活在社会弱势地位的患者在团队式初级保健诊所就医的机会较少。

Q2 Medicine Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.12927/hcpol.2023.27091
Nadia Deville-Stoetzel, Isabelle Gaboury, Jeannie Haggerty, Mylaine Breton
{"title":"生活在社会弱势地位的患者在团队式初级保健诊所就医的机会较少。","authors":"Nadia Deville-Stoetzel, Isabelle Gaboury, Jeannie Haggerty, Mylaine Breton","doi":"10.12927/hcpol.2023.27091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to explore differences in access to care as experienced by patients registered in team-based primary healthcare clinics according to their social vulnerability profile.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 1,562 patients from four team-based primary healthcare clinics completed an e-survey conducted between June and November 2021. The social vulnerability index was used to compare the experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with low vulnerability consulted at emergency rooms three times more often because their family physician was not available (<i>p</i> = 0.006) than patients with no vulnerability. Lack of continuity was reported two times more often by patients with low vulnerability related to team members not knowing their recent medical history (<i>p</i> = 0.006) and by patients with high vulnerability related to no one being in charge of their file (<i>p</i> = 0.023). Both vulnerable groups reported receiving contradictory information more often than patients with no vulnerability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with high vulnerability experienced more access difficulties related to continuity, interprofessional collaboration and communication with providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":39389,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 4","pages":"89-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/01/2e/policy-18-089.PMC10370394.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients Living with Social Vulnerabilities Experience Reduced Access at Team-Based Primary Healthcare Clinics.\",\"authors\":\"Nadia Deville-Stoetzel, Isabelle Gaboury, Jeannie Haggerty, Mylaine Breton\",\"doi\":\"10.12927/hcpol.2023.27091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to explore differences in access to care as experienced by patients registered in team-based primary healthcare clinics according to their social vulnerability profile.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 1,562 patients from four team-based primary healthcare clinics completed an e-survey conducted between June and November 2021. The social vulnerability index was used to compare the experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with low vulnerability consulted at emergency rooms three times more often because their family physician was not available (<i>p</i> = 0.006) than patients with no vulnerability. Lack of continuity was reported two times more often by patients with low vulnerability related to team members not knowing their recent medical history (<i>p</i> = 0.006) and by patients with high vulnerability related to no one being in charge of their file (<i>p</i> = 0.023). Both vulnerable groups reported receiving contradictory information more often than patients with no vulnerability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with high vulnerability experienced more access difficulties related to continuity, interprofessional collaboration and communication with providers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39389,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"18 4\",\"pages\":\"89-105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/01/2e/policy-18-089.PMC10370394.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2023.27091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2023.27091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨在以团队为基础的初级卫生保健诊所注册的患者根据其社会弱势状况获得医疗服务的差异:本研究旨在探讨在以团队为基础的基层医疗诊所注册的患者根据其社会脆弱性特征在获得医疗服务方面所经历的差异:来自四家团队式初级医疗诊所的 1562 名患者完成了 2021 年 6 月至 11 月期间进行的电子调查。结果:在急诊室就诊的患者中,社会弱势人群比例较低:结果:与没有社会脆弱性的患者相比,社会脆弱性低的患者因家庭医生无法提供服务而到急诊室就诊的频率要高出三倍(p = 0.006)。低脆弱性患者因团队成员不了解其近期病史(p = 0.006)和高脆弱性患者因无人负责其档案(p = 0.023)而报告缺乏连续性的频率分别高出两倍。与无弱势的患者相比,这两类弱势患者更常收到相互矛盾的信息:结论:弱势患者在连续性、跨专业合作以及与医疗服务提供者沟通方面遇到更多困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patients Living with Social Vulnerabilities Experience Reduced Access at Team-Based Primary Healthcare Clinics.

Objective: This study aims to explore differences in access to care as experienced by patients registered in team-based primary healthcare clinics according to their social vulnerability profile.

Method: A total of 1,562 patients from four team-based primary healthcare clinics completed an e-survey conducted between June and November 2021. The social vulnerability index was used to compare the experiences.

Results: Patients with low vulnerability consulted at emergency rooms three times more often because their family physician was not available (p = 0.006) than patients with no vulnerability. Lack of continuity was reported two times more often by patients with low vulnerability related to team members not knowing their recent medical history (p = 0.006) and by patients with high vulnerability related to no one being in charge of their file (p = 0.023). Both vulnerable groups reported receiving contradictory information more often than patients with no vulnerability.

Conclusion: Patients with high vulnerability experienced more access difficulties related to continuity, interprofessional collaboration and communication with providers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare Policy
Healthcare Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
Barriers and Solutions to Healthcare Access for Immigrants in Canada. Do Politics and Healthcare Intersect in 2026? Authentically and Effectively Addressing Migrant Health Needs. Electronic Access to and Exchange of Patient Information Among Physicians Practising in Canada. Tears, Suffering and System Failure: What My Father's Pain Revealed About the Canadian Healthcare System.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1