姑息关怀质量改进团队凝聚力的促进因素:从印度的一个七地实施项目中汲取的经验教训。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Care Management Review Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-09 DOI:10.1097/HMR.0000000000000368
Natalie B Connell, Sophia N Zupanc, Karl A Lorenz, Sushma Bhatnagar, Soraya Fereydooni, Raziel C Gamboa, Archana Ganesh, Aanchal Satija, Nainwant Singh, Odette Spruijt, Karleen F Giannitrapani
{"title":"姑息关怀质量改进团队凝聚力的促进因素:从印度的一个七地实施项目中汲取的经验教训。","authors":"Natalie B Connell, Sophia N Zupanc, Karl A Lorenz, Sushma Bhatnagar, Soraya Fereydooni, Raziel C Gamboa, Archana Ganesh, Aanchal Satija, Nainwant Singh, Odette Spruijt, Karleen F Giannitrapani","doi":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Palliative Care: Promoting Access and Improvement of the Cancer Experience (PC-PAICE) initiative is a team-based, palliative care (PC) quality improvement (QI) project working to promote high-quality PC in India. As a PC QI initiative, PC-PAICE implementation relied upon building interdisciplinary teams, providing the ideal context for understanding facilitators of team cohesion that compelled clinical, organizational, and administrative team members to work together. There is an opportunity to leverage the intersection between QI implementation and organizational theory to inform and improve implementation science.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>As a subaim of a larger implementation evaluation, we aimed to identify facilitators of team cohesion within QI implementation context.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A quota sampling approach captured the perspectives of 44 stakeholders across three strata (organizational leaders, clinical leaders, and clinical team members) from all seven sites through a semistructured interview guide informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). We used a combination of inductive and deductive approaches informed by organizational theory to identify facilitators.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>We identified three facilitators of PC team cohesion: (a) balancing formalization and flexibility around team roles, (b) establishing widespread awareness of the QI project, and (c) prioritizing a nonhierarchical organizational culture.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>Leveraging CFIR to analyze PC-PAICE stakeholder interviews created a data set conducive to understanding complex multisite implementation. Layering role and team theory to our implementation analysis helped us identify facilitators of team cohesion across levels within the team (bounded team), beyond the team (teaming), and surrounding the team (culture). These insights demonstrate the value of team and role theories in implementation evaluation efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":47778,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Management Review","volume":"48 3","pages":"219-228"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Facilitators of palliative care quality improvement team cohesion: Lessons from a seven-site implementation project in India.\",\"authors\":\"Natalie B Connell, Sophia N Zupanc, Karl A Lorenz, Sushma Bhatnagar, Soraya Fereydooni, Raziel C Gamboa, Archana Ganesh, Aanchal Satija, Nainwant Singh, Odette Spruijt, Karleen F Giannitrapani\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Palliative Care: Promoting Access and Improvement of the Cancer Experience (PC-PAICE) initiative is a team-based, palliative care (PC) quality improvement (QI) project working to promote high-quality PC in India. As a PC QI initiative, PC-PAICE implementation relied upon building interdisciplinary teams, providing the ideal context for understanding facilitators of team cohesion that compelled clinical, organizational, and administrative team members to work together. There is an opportunity to leverage the intersection between QI implementation and organizational theory to inform and improve implementation science.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>As a subaim of a larger implementation evaluation, we aimed to identify facilitators of team cohesion within QI implementation context.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A quota sampling approach captured the perspectives of 44 stakeholders across three strata (organizational leaders, clinical leaders, and clinical team members) from all seven sites through a semistructured interview guide informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). We used a combination of inductive and deductive approaches informed by organizational theory to identify facilitators.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>We identified three facilitators of PC team cohesion: (a) balancing formalization and flexibility around team roles, (b) establishing widespread awareness of the QI project, and (c) prioritizing a nonhierarchical organizational culture.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>Leveraging CFIR to analyze PC-PAICE stakeholder interviews created a data set conducive to understanding complex multisite implementation. Layering role and team theory to our implementation analysis helped us identify facilitators of team cohesion across levels within the team (bounded team), beyond the team (teaming), and surrounding the team (culture). These insights demonstrate the value of team and role theories in implementation evaluation efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Care Management Review\",\"volume\":\"48 3\",\"pages\":\"219-228\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Care Management Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000368\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000368","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景介绍姑息关怀:促进癌症患者获得姑息关怀和改善癌症患者体验(PC-PAICE)计划是一个以团队为基础的姑息关怀(PC)质量改进(QI)项目,致力于在印度推广高质量的姑息关怀。作为一项癌症姑息治疗质量改进项目,PC-PAICE 的实施依赖于跨学科团队的建设,为了解团队凝聚力的促进因素提供了理想的环境,这些因素迫使临床、组织和行政团队成员携手合作。我们有机会利用 QI 实施与组织理论之间的交叉点,为实施科学提供信息并加以改进。目的:作为一项大型实施评估的子项目,我们旨在确定 QI 实施背景下团队凝聚力的促进因素:我们采用配额抽样法,通过实施研究综合框架(CFIR)提供的半结构化访谈指南,收集了来自所有七个研究机构的三个阶层(组织领导者、临床领导者和临床团队成员)的 44 位利益相关者的观点。我们结合组织理论,采用归纳法和演绎法来确定促进因素:结果:我们确定了 PC 团队凝聚力的三个促进因素:(a)平衡团队角色的正规化和灵活性,(b)建立对 QI 项目的广泛认知,以及(c)优先考虑非等级组织文化:利用 CFIR 对 PC-PAICE 利益相关者访谈进行分析,创建了一套有利于理解复杂的多地点实施情况的数据集。将角色和团队理论与我们的实施分析相结合,有助于我们识别团队内部(有界限的团队)、团队外部(团队合作)以及团队周围(文化)各个层面的团队凝聚力促进因素。这些见解证明了团队和角色理论在实施评估工作中的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Facilitators of palliative care quality improvement team cohesion: Lessons from a seven-site implementation project in India.

Background: The Palliative Care: Promoting Access and Improvement of the Cancer Experience (PC-PAICE) initiative is a team-based, palliative care (PC) quality improvement (QI) project working to promote high-quality PC in India. As a PC QI initiative, PC-PAICE implementation relied upon building interdisciplinary teams, providing the ideal context for understanding facilitators of team cohesion that compelled clinical, organizational, and administrative team members to work together. There is an opportunity to leverage the intersection between QI implementation and organizational theory to inform and improve implementation science.

Purpose: As a subaim of a larger implementation evaluation, we aimed to identify facilitators of team cohesion within QI implementation context.

Methodology: A quota sampling approach captured the perspectives of 44 stakeholders across three strata (organizational leaders, clinical leaders, and clinical team members) from all seven sites through a semistructured interview guide informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). We used a combination of inductive and deductive approaches informed by organizational theory to identify facilitators.

Result: We identified three facilitators of PC team cohesion: (a) balancing formalization and flexibility around team roles, (b) establishing widespread awareness of the QI project, and (c) prioritizing a nonhierarchical organizational culture.

Practice implications: Leveraging CFIR to analyze PC-PAICE stakeholder interviews created a data set conducive to understanding complex multisite implementation. Layering role and team theory to our implementation analysis helped us identify facilitators of team cohesion across levels within the team (bounded team), beyond the team (teaming), and surrounding the team (culture). These insights demonstrate the value of team and role theories in implementation evaluation efforts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Care Management Review
Health Care Management Review HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Health Care Management Review (HCMR) disseminates state-of-the-art knowledge about management, leadership, and administration of health care systems, organizations, and agencies. Multidisciplinary and international in scope, articles present completed research relevant to health care management, leadership, and administration, as well report on rigorous evaluations of health care management innovations, or provide a synthesis of prior research that results in evidence-based health care management practice recommendations. Articles are theory-driven and translate findings into implications and recommendations for health care administrators, researchers, and faculty.
期刊最新文献
Improving joy at work and reducing burnout in health care workers in Victoria, Australia using the Institute for Healthcare Improvement joy in work framework: A mixed-methods study. What makes proactive behaviors at work effective? Perspectives of health care executives. Stanford Network for Advancement and Promotion: The impact of a community building-focused leadership development program on the success of underrepresented groups in academic medicine. Exploring barriers to employee voice among certified nursing assistants: A qualitative study. Good therapeutic connections and patient psychological safety: A qualitative survey study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1