Rafael Cavalcante Silva, José Mariani Jr., Breno de Alencar Araripe Falcão, Antonio Esteves Filho, Cesar Higa Nomura, Luiz Francisco Rodrigues de Ávila, José Rodrigues Parga, Pedro Alves Lemos Neto
{"title":"经皮导管置换术患者主动脉瓣环收缩期与舒张期ct血管造影显示的差异","authors":"Rafael Cavalcante Silva, José Mariani Jr., Breno de Alencar Araripe Falcão, Antonio Esteves Filho, Cesar Higa Nomura, Luiz Francisco Rodrigues de Ávila, José Rodrigues Parga, Pedro Alves Lemos Neto","doi":"10.1016/j.rbciev.2015.12.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Accurate aortic valve annulus sizing has critical importance for the planning of percutaneous transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. Although there is a recommendation to perform the measurement during systole, little is known about the importance of the differences between systolic and diastolic dimensions of the annulus.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Consecutive patients referred for TAVI were evaluated with computed tomography for valve annulus sizing during systole and diastole. Area, circumference, minimum and maximum diameters, and their mean derived diameters were obtained in both phases of the cardiac cycle. Bland-Altman plots were constructed to evaluate the differences between the measures.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The analysis included 41 patients with severe aortic stenosis. Mean area, circumference, and diameters were slightly greater in systole. However, in 35% of patients, diastolic dimensions were greater. These differences, although statistically significant, were small (the greatest difference of 0.6<!--> <!-->mm in mean diameter). Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement between systolic and diastolic measurements on all parameters evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Small differences were observed in the systolic and diastolic dimensions of the aortic valve annulus with computed tomography scan, which, although statistically significant, probably do not impact the selection of prosthesis or the procedure outcome.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101094,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasiva (English Edition)","volume":"23 2","pages":"Pages 130-133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbciev.2015.12.012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences between systolic and diastolic dimensions of the aortic valve annulus in computed tomography angiography in patients undergoing percutaneous implantation of aortic valve prosthesis by catheter\",\"authors\":\"Rafael Cavalcante Silva, José Mariani Jr., Breno de Alencar Araripe Falcão, Antonio Esteves Filho, Cesar Higa Nomura, Luiz Francisco Rodrigues de Ávila, José Rodrigues Parga, Pedro Alves Lemos Neto\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rbciev.2015.12.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Accurate aortic valve annulus sizing has critical importance for the planning of percutaneous transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. Although there is a recommendation to perform the measurement during systole, little is known about the importance of the differences between systolic and diastolic dimensions of the annulus.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Consecutive patients referred for TAVI were evaluated with computed tomography for valve annulus sizing during systole and diastole. Area, circumference, minimum and maximum diameters, and their mean derived diameters were obtained in both phases of the cardiac cycle. Bland-Altman plots were constructed to evaluate the differences between the measures.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The analysis included 41 patients with severe aortic stenosis. Mean area, circumference, and diameters were slightly greater in systole. However, in 35% of patients, diastolic dimensions were greater. These differences, although statistically significant, were small (the greatest difference of 0.6<!--> <!-->mm in mean diameter). Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement between systolic and diastolic measurements on all parameters evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Small differences were observed in the systolic and diastolic dimensions of the aortic valve annulus with computed tomography scan, which, although statistically significant, probably do not impact the selection of prosthesis or the procedure outcome.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasiva (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 130-133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbciev.2015.12.012\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasiva (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214123515000381\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasiva (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214123515000381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Differences between systolic and diastolic dimensions of the aortic valve annulus in computed tomography angiography in patients undergoing percutaneous implantation of aortic valve prosthesis by catheter
Background
Accurate aortic valve annulus sizing has critical importance for the planning of percutaneous transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. Although there is a recommendation to perform the measurement during systole, little is known about the importance of the differences between systolic and diastolic dimensions of the annulus.
Methods
Consecutive patients referred for TAVI were evaluated with computed tomography for valve annulus sizing during systole and diastole. Area, circumference, minimum and maximum diameters, and their mean derived diameters were obtained in both phases of the cardiac cycle. Bland-Altman plots were constructed to evaluate the differences between the measures.
Results
The analysis included 41 patients with severe aortic stenosis. Mean area, circumference, and diameters were slightly greater in systole. However, in 35% of patients, diastolic dimensions were greater. These differences, although statistically significant, were small (the greatest difference of 0.6 mm in mean diameter). Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement between systolic and diastolic measurements on all parameters evaluated.
Conclusions
Small differences were observed in the systolic and diastolic dimensions of the aortic valve annulus with computed tomography scan, which, although statistically significant, probably do not impact the selection of prosthesis or the procedure outcome.