Yan Hui, Shuxin Li, Junping Zhang, Bingcheng Liu, Yingchang Mi, Hui Wei, Jianxiang Wang
{"title":"基于bZIP区域突变的CEBPAdm AML异质性分析。","authors":"Yan Hui, Shuxin Li, Junping Zhang, Bingcheng Liu, Yingchang Mi, Hui Wei, Jianxiang Wang","doi":"10.1097/BS9.0000000000000153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with double-mutated <i>CEBPA</i> (<i>CEBPA</i>dm) AML were stratified into favorable risk group, however, few studies have investigated the heterogeneity of different <i>CEBPA</i>dm types in detail. In this study, we analyzed 2211 newly diagnosed AML and identified <i>CEBPA</i>dm in 10.8% of the patients. Within the <i>CEBPA</i>dm cohort, 225 of 239 patients (94.14%) presented with bZIP region mutations (<i>CEBPA</i>dmbZIP) while 14 of 239 patients (5.86%) without bZIP region mutation (<i>CEBPA</i>dmnonbZIP). Analysis of the accompanied molecular mutations showed statistically different incidences of GATA2 mutations between the <i>CEBPA</i>dmbZIP group and the <i>CEBPA</i>dmnonbZIP group (30.29% vs 0%). In the analysis of outcomes, patients with <i>CEBPA</i>dmnonbZIP were associated with shorter overall survival (OS) censored at hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) during CR1 compared to those with <i>CEBPA</i>dmbZIP (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.132, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.229-7.979, <i>P</i> = .017). Refractory or relapsed AML (R/RAML) patients with <i>CEBPA</i>dmnonbZIP were associated with shorter OS compared to those with <i>CEBPA</i>dmbZIP (HR = 2.881, 95% CI = 1.021-8.131, <i>P</i> = .046). Taken together, AML with <i>CEBPA</i>dmbZIP and <i>CEBPA</i>dmnonbZIP showed different outcomes and might be regarded as distinctive AML entities.</p>","PeriodicalId":67343,"journal":{"name":"血液科学(英文)","volume":"5 2","pages":"101-105"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10205380/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heterogeneity analysis of the <i>CEBPA</i>dm AML based on bZIP region mutations.\",\"authors\":\"Yan Hui, Shuxin Li, Junping Zhang, Bingcheng Liu, Yingchang Mi, Hui Wei, Jianxiang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BS9.0000000000000153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Patients with double-mutated <i>CEBPA</i> (<i>CEBPA</i>dm) AML were stratified into favorable risk group, however, few studies have investigated the heterogeneity of different <i>CEBPA</i>dm types in detail. In this study, we analyzed 2211 newly diagnosed AML and identified <i>CEBPA</i>dm in 10.8% of the patients. Within the <i>CEBPA</i>dm cohort, 225 of 239 patients (94.14%) presented with bZIP region mutations (<i>CEBPA</i>dmbZIP) while 14 of 239 patients (5.86%) without bZIP region mutation (<i>CEBPA</i>dmnonbZIP). Analysis of the accompanied molecular mutations showed statistically different incidences of GATA2 mutations between the <i>CEBPA</i>dmbZIP group and the <i>CEBPA</i>dmnonbZIP group (30.29% vs 0%). In the analysis of outcomes, patients with <i>CEBPA</i>dmnonbZIP were associated with shorter overall survival (OS) censored at hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) during CR1 compared to those with <i>CEBPA</i>dmbZIP (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.132, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.229-7.979, <i>P</i> = .017). Refractory or relapsed AML (R/RAML) patients with <i>CEBPA</i>dmnonbZIP were associated with shorter OS compared to those with <i>CEBPA</i>dmbZIP (HR = 2.881, 95% CI = 1.021-8.131, <i>P</i> = .046). Taken together, AML with <i>CEBPA</i>dmbZIP and <i>CEBPA</i>dmnonbZIP showed different outcomes and might be regarded as distinctive AML entities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":67343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"血液科学(英文)\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"101-105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10205380/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"血液科学(英文)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BS9.0000000000000153\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"血液科学(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BS9.0000000000000153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
双突变CEBPA (CEBPAdm) AML患者被划分为有利风险组,但很少有研究详细探讨不同类型CEBPAdm的异质性。在这项研究中,我们分析了2211例新诊断的AML,在10.8%的患者中发现了CEBPAdm。在CEBPAdm队列中,239例患者中有225例(94.14%)出现bZIP区域突变(CEBPAdmbZIP), 239例患者中有14例(5.86%)未出现bZIP区域突变(CEBPAdmnonbZIP)。伴随分子突变分析显示,CEBPAdmbZIP组和CEBPAdmnonbZIP组的GATA2突变发生率有统计学差异(30.29% vs 0%)。在结果分析中,与CEBPAdmbZIP患者相比,CEBPAdmnonbZIP患者在CR1期间造血干细胞移植(HSCT)中总生存期(OS)更短(风险比(HR) = 3.132, 95%可信区间(CI) = 1.229-7.979, P = 0.017)。与患有CEBPAdmnonbZIP的患者相比,患有CEBPAdmbZIP的难治性或复发性AML (R/RAML)患者的生存期较短(HR = 2.881, 95% CI = 1.021-8.131, P = 0.046)。合并CEBPAdmbZIP和CEBPAdmnonbZIP的AML表现出不同的结果,可能被视为不同的AML实体。
Heterogeneity analysis of the CEBPAdm AML based on bZIP region mutations.
Patients with double-mutated CEBPA (CEBPAdm) AML were stratified into favorable risk group, however, few studies have investigated the heterogeneity of different CEBPAdm types in detail. In this study, we analyzed 2211 newly diagnosed AML and identified CEBPAdm in 10.8% of the patients. Within the CEBPAdm cohort, 225 of 239 patients (94.14%) presented with bZIP region mutations (CEBPAdmbZIP) while 14 of 239 patients (5.86%) without bZIP region mutation (CEBPAdmnonbZIP). Analysis of the accompanied molecular mutations showed statistically different incidences of GATA2 mutations between the CEBPAdmbZIP group and the CEBPAdmnonbZIP group (30.29% vs 0%). In the analysis of outcomes, patients with CEBPAdmnonbZIP were associated with shorter overall survival (OS) censored at hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) during CR1 compared to those with CEBPAdmbZIP (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.132, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.229-7.979, P = .017). Refractory or relapsed AML (R/RAML) patients with CEBPAdmnonbZIP were associated with shorter OS compared to those with CEBPAdmbZIP (HR = 2.881, 95% CI = 1.021-8.131, P = .046). Taken together, AML with CEBPAdmbZIP and CEBPAdmnonbZIP showed different outcomes and might be regarded as distinctive AML entities.