髋部骨折手术前传统消毒方法与改良消毒方法的比较——护理人员的体会

Noelle Probert , Karin Blomberg , Per Wretenberg , Åsa G. Andersson
{"title":"髋部骨折手术前传统消毒方法与改良消毒方法的比较——护理人员的体会","authors":"Noelle Probert ,&nbsp;Karin Blomberg ,&nbsp;Per Wretenberg ,&nbsp;Åsa G. Andersson","doi":"10.1016/j.ijotn.2023.101002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>National guidelines in Sweden recommend preoperative full-body disinfection (FBD) with 4% chlorhexidine to prevent surgical-site infection (SSI) after hip fracture surgery, a method causing patients’ severe pain. Although, due to little evidence in research, orthopedic clinics in Sweden are wavering in favor of simpler methods such as local disinfection (LD) of the surgical site.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The aim of this study was to describe the experiences of nursing personnel regarding the performance of preoperative LD on patients prior to hip fracture surgery after having switched from FBD.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study has a qualitative design where data were collected via focus-group discussions (FGDs) including in total 12 participants and analysed using content analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Six categories were identified describing the aim: sparing the patients' physical harm, sparing the patients’ psychological distress, involving the patients in the procedure, improving the working environment for personnel, preventing unethical situations and a more adequate utilization of resources.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>All participants considered LD of the surgical site as a favorable method to FBD, witnessing of an increased wellbeing in patients and the method facilitating a better involvement of patients in the procedure, findings that are supported by other studies promoting person-centered care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45099,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Traditional compared to modified method of disinfection before hip fracture surgery - Experiences of nursing personnel\",\"authors\":\"Noelle Probert ,&nbsp;Karin Blomberg ,&nbsp;Per Wretenberg ,&nbsp;Åsa G. Andersson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijotn.2023.101002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>National guidelines in Sweden recommend preoperative full-body disinfection (FBD) with 4% chlorhexidine to prevent surgical-site infection (SSI) after hip fracture surgery, a method causing patients’ severe pain. Although, due to little evidence in research, orthopedic clinics in Sweden are wavering in favor of simpler methods such as local disinfection (LD) of the surgical site.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The aim of this study was to describe the experiences of nursing personnel regarding the performance of preoperative LD on patients prior to hip fracture surgery after having switched from FBD.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study has a qualitative design where data were collected via focus-group discussions (FGDs) including in total 12 participants and analysed using content analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Six categories were identified describing the aim: sparing the patients' physical harm, sparing the patients’ psychological distress, involving the patients in the procedure, improving the working environment for personnel, preventing unethical situations and a more adequate utilization of resources.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>All participants considered LD of the surgical site as a favorable method to FBD, witnessing of an increased wellbeing in patients and the method facilitating a better involvement of patients in the procedure, findings that are supported by other studies promoting person-centered care.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878124123000060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878124123000060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

瑞典国家指南推荐术前用4%氯己定全身消毒(FBD)来预防髋部骨折手术后手术部位感染(SSI),这种方法会导致患者剧烈疼痛。虽然,由于研究证据很少,瑞典的骨科诊所倾向于更简单的方法,如手术部位的局部消毒(LD)。目的本研究的目的是描述护理人员在髋部骨折手术前从FBD转换为术前LD的经验。方法本研究采用定性设计,通过焦点小组讨论(fgd)收集数据,共包括12名参与者,并使用内容分析进行分析。结果将护理目的分为6个类别:避免患者的身体伤害、避免患者的心理困扰、让患者参与到护理过程中来、改善医护人员的工作环境、防止不道德的情况和更充分地利用资源。所有参与者都认为手术部位的LD是FBD的一种有利方法,见证了患者的幸福感增加,该方法促进了患者更好地参与手术,其他研究也支持了这一发现,促进了以人为本的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Traditional compared to modified method of disinfection before hip fracture surgery - Experiences of nursing personnel

Background

National guidelines in Sweden recommend preoperative full-body disinfection (FBD) with 4% chlorhexidine to prevent surgical-site infection (SSI) after hip fracture surgery, a method causing patients’ severe pain. Although, due to little evidence in research, orthopedic clinics in Sweden are wavering in favor of simpler methods such as local disinfection (LD) of the surgical site.

Purpose

The aim of this study was to describe the experiences of nursing personnel regarding the performance of preoperative LD on patients prior to hip fracture surgery after having switched from FBD.

Methods

This study has a qualitative design where data were collected via focus-group discussions (FGDs) including in total 12 participants and analysed using content analysis.

Results

Six categories were identified describing the aim: sparing the patients' physical harm, sparing the patients’ psychological distress, involving the patients in the procedure, improving the working environment for personnel, preventing unethical situations and a more adequate utilization of resources.

Conclusions

All participants considered LD of the surgical site as a favorable method to FBD, witnessing of an increased wellbeing in patients and the method facilitating a better involvement of patients in the procedure, findings that are supported by other studies promoting person-centered care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Current status of postoperative care for elderly osteoporotic fracture patients in Jiangsu Province, China: A multicenter cross-sectional study Corrigendum to "The effectiveness of prophylactic closed incision negative pressure wound therapy compared to conventional dressings in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection post hip and knee revision arthroplasty surgery: A systematic review" [Int. J. Orthopaed. Trauma Nurs. 53 (2024) 101048]. LITERATURE REVIEWS – The effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on bone healing and tissue regeneration Health literacy of older adults with musculoskeletal problems: A systematic review Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1