及时提供安全补丁和自动更新的法律义务。

International cybersecurity law review Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-06 DOI:10.1365/s43439-022-00059-6
Alana Maurushat, Kathy Nguyen
{"title":"及时提供安全补丁和自动更新的法律义务。","authors":"Alana Maurushat,&nbsp;Kathy Nguyen","doi":"10.1365/s43439-022-00059-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Do you use Office 365 or Windows 10? How about GoDaddy to support your website? Has it been a while since you connected your iPhone to Wi-Fi instead of merely running off your data? Or is your Samsung phone more than 2 years old? Would it surprise you to learn that some of these products no longer receive security support or automatic updates? If so, you may be surprised to hear that you are being exposed to security risks, as many cyber incidences are the direct result of an absence of security patching and automatic updates. There are many reasons for this. Most companies provide security patches, but they are not always timely and many are not automated, requiring manual effort (often unbeknownst to consumers and businesses). Timely security patching is, upon discovery or notification of a security flaw in a system or product, the release of a security update within a reasonable time that patches and updates the security of a system-sometimes this is automatic, sometimes the security patch is merely a notification that you can and should patch your own system. A contributing factor to this is that there is no legal obligation to provide security support, let alone timely security support. This means that there is no legal requirement to patch known security vulnerabilities and bugs or issue automatic updates. This paper asks whether or not Australia should have a legal obligation to ensure timely security patching and require automatic updates by default in all consumer systems. Our conclusion: yes, it should, since many companies cannot be relied on to self-regulate and put their client's security interests first, and the stakes in cybersecurity have become too high to continue with the status quo. We conclude by presenting our recommended pathway for legal reform.</p>","PeriodicalId":73412,"journal":{"name":"International cybersecurity law review","volume":"3 2","pages":"437-465"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9446640/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The legal obligation to provide timely security patching and automatic updates.\",\"authors\":\"Alana Maurushat,&nbsp;Kathy Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.1365/s43439-022-00059-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Do you use Office 365 or Windows 10? How about GoDaddy to support your website? Has it been a while since you connected your iPhone to Wi-Fi instead of merely running off your data? Or is your Samsung phone more than 2 years old? Would it surprise you to learn that some of these products no longer receive security support or automatic updates? If so, you may be surprised to hear that you are being exposed to security risks, as many cyber incidences are the direct result of an absence of security patching and automatic updates. There are many reasons for this. Most companies provide security patches, but they are not always timely and many are not automated, requiring manual effort (often unbeknownst to consumers and businesses). Timely security patching is, upon discovery or notification of a security flaw in a system or product, the release of a security update within a reasonable time that patches and updates the security of a system-sometimes this is automatic, sometimes the security patch is merely a notification that you can and should patch your own system. A contributing factor to this is that there is no legal obligation to provide security support, let alone timely security support. This means that there is no legal requirement to patch known security vulnerabilities and bugs or issue automatic updates. This paper asks whether or not Australia should have a legal obligation to ensure timely security patching and require automatic updates by default in all consumer systems. Our conclusion: yes, it should, since many companies cannot be relied on to self-regulate and put their client's security interests first, and the stakes in cybersecurity have become too high to continue with the status quo. We conclude by presenting our recommended pathway for legal reform.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International cybersecurity law review\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"437-465\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9446640/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International cybersecurity law review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1365/s43439-022-00059-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/9/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International cybersecurity law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1365/s43439-022-00059-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

你使用Office 365还是Windows 10?GoDaddy支持你的网站怎么样?你已经有一段时间没有把iPhone连接到Wi-Fi了吗?或者你的三星手机已经使用2年多了?得知其中一些产品不再获得安全支持或自动更新,你会感到惊讶吗?如果是这样的话,你可能会惊讶地听说你正面临安全风险,因为许多网络事件都是缺乏安全补丁和自动更新的直接结果。原因有很多。大多数公司都提供安全补丁,但它们并不总是及时的,许多公司也不是自动化的,需要手动操作(消费者和企业通常不知道)。及时的安全补丁是指在发现或通知系统或产品中的安全缺陷后,在合理的时间内发布安全更新,以修补和更新系统的安全性——有时这是自动的,有时安全补丁只是通知您可以也应该修补自己的系统。造成这种情况的一个因素是,没有提供安全支持的法律义务,更不用说及时的安全支持了。这意味着没有法律要求修补已知的安全漏洞和错误或发布自动更新。本文询问澳大利亚是否有法律义务确保及时进行安全修补,并要求在所有消费者系统中默认自动更新。我们的结论是:是的,应该这样做,因为不能指望许多公司进行自我监管,把客户的安全利益放在首位,而且网络安全的风险已经太高,无法维持现状。最后,我们介绍了我们建议的法律改革途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The legal obligation to provide timely security patching and automatic updates.

Do you use Office 365 or Windows 10? How about GoDaddy to support your website? Has it been a while since you connected your iPhone to Wi-Fi instead of merely running off your data? Or is your Samsung phone more than 2 years old? Would it surprise you to learn that some of these products no longer receive security support or automatic updates? If so, you may be surprised to hear that you are being exposed to security risks, as many cyber incidences are the direct result of an absence of security patching and automatic updates. There are many reasons for this. Most companies provide security patches, but they are not always timely and many are not automated, requiring manual effort (often unbeknownst to consumers and businesses). Timely security patching is, upon discovery or notification of a security flaw in a system or product, the release of a security update within a reasonable time that patches and updates the security of a system-sometimes this is automatic, sometimes the security patch is merely a notification that you can and should patch your own system. A contributing factor to this is that there is no legal obligation to provide security support, let alone timely security support. This means that there is no legal requirement to patch known security vulnerabilities and bugs or issue automatic updates. This paper asks whether or not Australia should have a legal obligation to ensure timely security patching and require automatic updates by default in all consumer systems. Our conclusion: yes, it should, since many companies cannot be relied on to self-regulate and put their client's security interests first, and the stakes in cybersecurity have become too high to continue with the status quo. We conclude by presenting our recommended pathway for legal reform.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cybersecurity Regulation—Types, Principles, and Country Deep Dives in Asia VAT/GST harmonisation challenges for digital assets such as bitcoin and NFTs in the EU following Case C-264/14 (Skatteverket v David Hedqist) Cyberstalking in Nigeria: An Exploratory Study of Section 24 of the Nigerian Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) (Amendment) Act, 2024 Shared intelligence, enhanced resilience: sharing cyber threat information and intelligence under DORA A multi-layered security model to counter social engineering attacks: a learning-based approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1