{"title":"囊性纤维化患者呼出液和血清中亚硝化应激的生物标志物","authors":"Sabina Galiniak , Nataliya Rohovyk , Marta Rachel","doi":"10.1016/j.advms.2023.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The measurement of biomarkers in exhaled breath condensate<span><span> (EBC) offers a non-invasive way to assess airway disease and can be easily done in a clinical setting among patients with </span>cystic fibrosis<span> (CF). The role of oxidative and nitrosative stress in the complex pathophysiology of CF is widely accepted and biomarkers of oxidative and nitrosative stress can be measured in the serum and EBC. To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess markers of nitrosative stress in EBC and serum, collected simultaneously from the CF patients.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>Paired EBC and serum samples were collected from 36 stable patients with CF and 14 healthy controls. Markers of nitrosative stress ‒ 3-nitrotyrosine and nitrate/nitrite were measured in the EBC and serum using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We found no differences in 3-nitrotyrosine and nitrate/nitrite in the EBC of patients with CF as compared to healthy controls (125.37 ± 3.29 vs. 126.24 ± 2.21 nmol/L, p = 0.218; 12.66 ± 7.23 vs. 8.79 ± 4.83 μmol/L, p = 0.133, respectively). Furthermore, 3-nitrotyrosine and nitrate/nitrite were significantly higher in the serum of patients with CF as compared to the healthy controls (0.13 ± 0.02 vs. 0.11 ± 0.01 nmol/mg protein, p = 0.003; 70.78 ± 22.55 vs. 53.08 ± 8.5 μmol/L, p = 0.009, respectively). No correlations were found between the markers determined in the EBC and serum.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results of the EBC nitrosative stress biomarkers should be interpreted with caution, especially in patients with stable disease, as the EBC values may be independent on levels of circulating markers that are elevated in the serum of patients with stable CF.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7347,"journal":{"name":"Advances in medical sciences","volume":"68 2","pages":"Pages 202-207"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomarkers of nitrosative stress in exhaled breath condensate and serum among patients with cystic fibrosis\",\"authors\":\"Sabina Galiniak , Nataliya Rohovyk , Marta Rachel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.advms.2023.05.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The measurement of biomarkers in exhaled breath condensate<span><span> (EBC) offers a non-invasive way to assess airway disease and can be easily done in a clinical setting among patients with </span>cystic fibrosis<span> (CF). The role of oxidative and nitrosative stress in the complex pathophysiology of CF is widely accepted and biomarkers of oxidative and nitrosative stress can be measured in the serum and EBC. To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess markers of nitrosative stress in EBC and serum, collected simultaneously from the CF patients.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>Paired EBC and serum samples were collected from 36 stable patients with CF and 14 healthy controls. Markers of nitrosative stress ‒ 3-nitrotyrosine and nitrate/nitrite were measured in the EBC and serum using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We found no differences in 3-nitrotyrosine and nitrate/nitrite in the EBC of patients with CF as compared to healthy controls (125.37 ± 3.29 vs. 126.24 ± 2.21 nmol/L, p = 0.218; 12.66 ± 7.23 vs. 8.79 ± 4.83 μmol/L, p = 0.133, respectively). Furthermore, 3-nitrotyrosine and nitrate/nitrite were significantly higher in the serum of patients with CF as compared to the healthy controls (0.13 ± 0.02 vs. 0.11 ± 0.01 nmol/mg protein, p = 0.003; 70.78 ± 22.55 vs. 53.08 ± 8.5 μmol/L, p = 0.009, respectively). No correlations were found between the markers determined in the EBC and serum.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results of the EBC nitrosative stress biomarkers should be interpreted with caution, especially in patients with stable disease, as the EBC values may be independent on levels of circulating markers that are elevated in the serum of patients with stable CF.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in medical sciences\",\"volume\":\"68 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 202-207\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in medical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1896112623000172\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1896112623000172","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Biomarkers of nitrosative stress in exhaled breath condensate and serum among patients with cystic fibrosis
Purpose
The measurement of biomarkers in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) offers a non-invasive way to assess airway disease and can be easily done in a clinical setting among patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). The role of oxidative and nitrosative stress in the complex pathophysiology of CF is widely accepted and biomarkers of oxidative and nitrosative stress can be measured in the serum and EBC. To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess markers of nitrosative stress in EBC and serum, collected simultaneously from the CF patients.
Patients and methods
Paired EBC and serum samples were collected from 36 stable patients with CF and 14 healthy controls. Markers of nitrosative stress ‒ 3-nitrotyrosine and nitrate/nitrite were measured in the EBC and serum using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Results
We found no differences in 3-nitrotyrosine and nitrate/nitrite in the EBC of patients with CF as compared to healthy controls (125.37 ± 3.29 vs. 126.24 ± 2.21 nmol/L, p = 0.218; 12.66 ± 7.23 vs. 8.79 ± 4.83 μmol/L, p = 0.133, respectively). Furthermore, 3-nitrotyrosine and nitrate/nitrite were significantly higher in the serum of patients with CF as compared to the healthy controls (0.13 ± 0.02 vs. 0.11 ± 0.01 nmol/mg protein, p = 0.003; 70.78 ± 22.55 vs. 53.08 ± 8.5 μmol/L, p = 0.009, respectively). No correlations were found between the markers determined in the EBC and serum.
Conclusions
The results of the EBC nitrosative stress biomarkers should be interpreted with caution, especially in patients with stable disease, as the EBC values may be independent on levels of circulating markers that are elevated in the serum of patients with stable CF.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Medical Sciences is an international, peer-reviewed journal that welcomes original research articles and reviews on current advances in life sciences, preclinical and clinical medicine, and related disciplines.
The Journal’s primary aim is to make every effort to contribute to progress in medical sciences. The strive is to bridge laboratory and clinical settings with cutting edge research findings and new developments.
Advances in Medical Sciences publishes articles which bring novel insights into diagnostic and molecular imaging, offering essential prior knowledge for diagnosis and treatment indispensable in all areas of medical sciences. It also publishes articles on pathological sciences giving foundation knowledge on the overall study of human diseases. Through its publications Advances in Medical Sciences also stresses the importance of pharmaceutical sciences as a rapidly and ever expanding area of research on drug design, development, action and evaluation contributing significantly to a variety of scientific disciplines.
The journal welcomes submissions from the following disciplines:
General and internal medicine,
Cancer research,
Genetics,
Endocrinology,
Gastroenterology,
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,
Immunology and Allergy,
Pathology and Forensic Medicine,
Cell and molecular Biology,
Haematology,
Biochemistry,
Clinical and Experimental Pathology.