两种不同益生菌对巨噬细胞mRNA表达的影响

IF 4.2 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Science of Animal Resources Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.5851/kosfa.2023.e23
Sang-Pil Choi, Si-Won Park, Seok-Jin Kang, Seul Ki Lim, Min-Sung Kwon, Hak-Jong Choi, Taehoon Chun
{"title":"两种不同益生菌对巨噬细胞mRNA表达的影响","authors":"Sang-Pil Choi,&nbsp;Si-Won Park,&nbsp;Seok-Jin Kang,&nbsp;Seul Ki Lim,&nbsp;Min-Sung Kwon,&nbsp;Hak-Jong Choi,&nbsp;Taehoon Chun","doi":"10.5851/kosfa.2023.e23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As an initial study to elucidate the molecular mechanism of how probiotics modulate macrophage activity, we monitored mRNA expression patterns in peritoneal macrophages (PMs) treated with two different strains of probiotics. After treatment with either <i>Weissella cibaria</i> WIKIM28 or <i>Latilactobacillus sakei</i> WIKIM50, total RNAs from PMs were isolated and subjected into gene chip analyses. As controls, mRNAs from vehicle (phosphate-buffered saline, PBS)-treated PMs were also subjected to gene chip analysis. Compared to vehicle (PBS)-treated PMs, WIKIM28-treated and WIKIM50-treated PMs exhibited a total of 889 and 432 differentially expressed genes with expression differences of at least 4 folds, respectively. Compared to WIKIM28-treated PMs, WIKIM50-treated PMs showed 25 up-regulated genes and 21 down-regulated genes with expression differences of more than 2 folds. Interestingly, mRNA transcripts of M2 macrophage polarization marker such as <i>anxa1</i>, <i>mafb</i>, and <i>sepp1</i> were increased in WIKIM50-treated PMs comparing to those in WIKIM28-treated PMs. Reversely, mRNA transcripts of M1 macrophage polarization marker such as <i>hdac9</i>, <i>ptgs2</i>, and <i>socs3</i> were decreased in WIKIM50-treated PMs comparing to those in WIKIM28-treated PMs. In agreement with these observations, mRNA expression levels of tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-1α were significantly reduced in WIKIM50-treated macrophages compared to those in WIKIM28-treated macrophages. These results may indicate that probiotics can be classified as two different types depending on their ability to convert macrophages into M1 or M2 polarization.</p>","PeriodicalId":12459,"journal":{"name":"Food Science of Animal Resources","volume":"43 4","pages":"703-711"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/37/c2/kosfa-43-4-703.PMC10359838.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monitoring mRNA Expression Patterns in Macrophages in Response to Two Different Strains of Probiotics.\",\"authors\":\"Sang-Pil Choi,&nbsp;Si-Won Park,&nbsp;Seok-Jin Kang,&nbsp;Seul Ki Lim,&nbsp;Min-Sung Kwon,&nbsp;Hak-Jong Choi,&nbsp;Taehoon Chun\",\"doi\":\"10.5851/kosfa.2023.e23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As an initial study to elucidate the molecular mechanism of how probiotics modulate macrophage activity, we monitored mRNA expression patterns in peritoneal macrophages (PMs) treated with two different strains of probiotics. After treatment with either <i>Weissella cibaria</i> WIKIM28 or <i>Latilactobacillus sakei</i> WIKIM50, total RNAs from PMs were isolated and subjected into gene chip analyses. As controls, mRNAs from vehicle (phosphate-buffered saline, PBS)-treated PMs were also subjected to gene chip analysis. Compared to vehicle (PBS)-treated PMs, WIKIM28-treated and WIKIM50-treated PMs exhibited a total of 889 and 432 differentially expressed genes with expression differences of at least 4 folds, respectively. Compared to WIKIM28-treated PMs, WIKIM50-treated PMs showed 25 up-regulated genes and 21 down-regulated genes with expression differences of more than 2 folds. Interestingly, mRNA transcripts of M2 macrophage polarization marker such as <i>anxa1</i>, <i>mafb</i>, and <i>sepp1</i> were increased in WIKIM50-treated PMs comparing to those in WIKIM28-treated PMs. Reversely, mRNA transcripts of M1 macrophage polarization marker such as <i>hdac9</i>, <i>ptgs2</i>, and <i>socs3</i> were decreased in WIKIM50-treated PMs comparing to those in WIKIM28-treated PMs. In agreement with these observations, mRNA expression levels of tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-1α were significantly reduced in WIKIM50-treated macrophages compared to those in WIKIM28-treated macrophages. These results may indicate that probiotics can be classified as two different types depending on their ability to convert macrophages into M1 or M2 polarization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Science of Animal Resources\",\"volume\":\"43 4\",\"pages\":\"703-711\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/37/c2/kosfa-43-4-703.PMC10359838.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Science of Animal Resources\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2023.e23\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Science of Animal Resources","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2023.e23","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为阐明益生菌调节巨噬细胞活性的分子机制的初步研究,我们监测了两种不同菌株益生菌处理的腹膜巨噬细胞(pm)的mRNA表达模式。用魏氏锡巴利菌WIKIM28或萨克拉乳酸杆菌WIKIM50处理后,从pm中分离总rna并进行基因芯片分析。作为对照,从载体(磷酸盐缓冲盐水,PBS)处理的pm的mrna也进行基因芯片分析。与载体(PBS)处理的pmms相比,wikim28处理和wikim50处理的pmms分别有889个和432个差异表达基因,表达差异至少为4倍。与wikim28处理的pmms相比,wikim50处理的pmms有25个上调基因和21个下调基因,表达差异大于2倍。有趣的是,与wikim28处理的pm相比,wikim50处理的pm中M2巨噬细胞极化标记物如anxa1, mahb和sepp1的mRNA转录量增加。相反,与wikim28处理的pm相比,wikim50处理的pm中M1巨噬细胞极化标记物如hdac9、ptgs2和socs3的mRNA转录物减少。与这些观察结果一致,与wikim28处理的巨噬细胞相比,wikim50处理的巨噬细胞中肿瘤坏死因子-α和白细胞介素-1α的mRNA表达水平显著降低。这些结果可能表明益生菌可以根据其将巨噬细胞转化为M1或M2极化的能力分为两种不同的类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Monitoring mRNA Expression Patterns in Macrophages in Response to Two Different Strains of Probiotics.

As an initial study to elucidate the molecular mechanism of how probiotics modulate macrophage activity, we monitored mRNA expression patterns in peritoneal macrophages (PMs) treated with two different strains of probiotics. After treatment with either Weissella cibaria WIKIM28 or Latilactobacillus sakei WIKIM50, total RNAs from PMs were isolated and subjected into gene chip analyses. As controls, mRNAs from vehicle (phosphate-buffered saline, PBS)-treated PMs were also subjected to gene chip analysis. Compared to vehicle (PBS)-treated PMs, WIKIM28-treated and WIKIM50-treated PMs exhibited a total of 889 and 432 differentially expressed genes with expression differences of at least 4 folds, respectively. Compared to WIKIM28-treated PMs, WIKIM50-treated PMs showed 25 up-regulated genes and 21 down-regulated genes with expression differences of more than 2 folds. Interestingly, mRNA transcripts of M2 macrophage polarization marker such as anxa1, mafb, and sepp1 were increased in WIKIM50-treated PMs comparing to those in WIKIM28-treated PMs. Reversely, mRNA transcripts of M1 macrophage polarization marker such as hdac9, ptgs2, and socs3 were decreased in WIKIM50-treated PMs comparing to those in WIKIM28-treated PMs. In agreement with these observations, mRNA expression levels of tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-1α were significantly reduced in WIKIM50-treated macrophages compared to those in WIKIM28-treated macrophages. These results may indicate that probiotics can be classified as two different types depending on their ability to convert macrophages into M1 or M2 polarization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Science of Animal Resources
Food Science of Animal Resources Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Food Science of Animal Resources (Food Sci. Anim. Resour.) is an international, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research and review articles on scientific and technological aspects of chemistry, biotechnology, processing, engineering, and microbiology of meat, egg, dairy, and edible insect/worm products.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Peroxidized Acetic Acid Disinfectant Proper Use Concentration and its Effect on Appearance of Chicken Carcasses. Exploring the Utilization of Bovine Blood as a Source of Antioxidant Peptide: Production, Concentration, Identification, and In Silico Gastrointestinal Digestion. Interconnection of the Gut-Skin Axis in NC/Nga Mouse with Atopic Dermatitis: Effects of the Three Types of Bifidobacterium bifidum CBT-BF3 (Probiotics, Postbiotics, and Cytosine-Phosphate-Guanine Oligodeoxynucleotide) on T Cell Differentiation and Gut Microbiota. Advanced Halal Authentication Methods and Technology for Addressing Non-Compliance Concerns in Halal Meat and Meat Products Supply Chain: A Review. Antioxidant, Antihypertensive, and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Long-Term Ripened Cheddar Cheese Water-Soluble Extract.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1