ALK 变异等位基因频率在 NSCLC 靶向治疗疗效预测中的潜在不可靠因素。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Frontiers of Medicine Pub Date : 2023-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1007/s11684-022-0946-x
Wei Rao, Yutao Liu, Yan Li, Lei Guo, Tian Qiu, Lin Dong, Jianming Ying, Weihua Li
{"title":"ALK 变异等位基因频率在 NSCLC 靶向治疗疗效预测中的潜在不可靠因素。","authors":"Wei Rao, Yutao Liu, Yan Li, Lei Guo, Tian Qiu, Lin Dong, Jianming Ying, Weihua Li","doi":"10.1007/s11684-022-0946-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) is the most common fusion gene involved in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and remarkable response has been achieved with the use of ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs). However, the clinical efficacy is highly variable. Pre-existing intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) has been proven to contribute to the poor treatment response and the resistance to targeted therapies. In this work, we investigated whether the variant allele frequencies (VAFs) of ALK fusions can help assess ITH and predict targeted therapy efficacy. Through the application of next-generation sequencing (NGS), 7.2% (326/4548) of patients were detected to be ALK positive. On the basis of the adjusted VAF (adjVAF, VAF normalization for tumor purity) of four different threshold values (adjVAF < 50%, 40%, 30%, or 20%), the association of ALK subclonality with crizotinib efficacy was assessed. Nonetheless, no statistical association was observed between median progression-free survival (PFS) and ALK subclonality assessed by adjVAF, and a poor correlation of adjVAF with PFS was found among the 85 patients who received first-line crizotinib. Results suggest that the ALK VAF determined by hybrid capture-based NGS is probably unreliable for ITH assessment and targeted therapy efficacy prediction in NSCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":12558,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Potential unreliability of ALK variant allele frequency in the efficacy prediction of targeted therapy in NSCLC.\",\"authors\":\"Wei Rao, Yutao Liu, Yan Li, Lei Guo, Tian Qiu, Lin Dong, Jianming Ying, Weihua Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11684-022-0946-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) is the most common fusion gene involved in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and remarkable response has been achieved with the use of ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs). However, the clinical efficacy is highly variable. Pre-existing intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) has been proven to contribute to the poor treatment response and the resistance to targeted therapies. In this work, we investigated whether the variant allele frequencies (VAFs) of ALK fusions can help assess ITH and predict targeted therapy efficacy. Through the application of next-generation sequencing (NGS), 7.2% (326/4548) of patients were detected to be ALK positive. On the basis of the adjusted VAF (adjVAF, VAF normalization for tumor purity) of four different threshold values (adjVAF < 50%, 40%, 30%, or 20%), the association of ALK subclonality with crizotinib efficacy was assessed. Nonetheless, no statistical association was observed between median progression-free survival (PFS) and ALK subclonality assessed by adjVAF, and a poor correlation of adjVAF with PFS was found among the 85 patients who received first-line crizotinib. Results suggest that the ALK VAF determined by hybrid capture-based NGS is probably unreliable for ITH assessment and targeted therapy efficacy prediction in NSCLC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers of Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-022-0946-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/4/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-022-0946-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)是非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中最常见的融合基因,使用ALK酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(ALK-TKIs)已取得显著疗效。然而,临床疗效却千差万别。已有研究证明,瘤内异质性(ITH)是导致治疗反应不佳和靶向治疗耐药的原因之一。在这项工作中,我们研究了ALK融合的变异等位基因频率(VAF)是否有助于评估ITH和预测靶向治疗的疗效。通过应用新一代测序技术(NGS),7.2%(326/4548)的患者被检测出ALK阳性。根据四种不同阈值(adjVAF<50%、40%、30%或20%)的调整VAF(adjVAF,肿瘤纯度的VAF归一化),评估了ALK亚克隆性与克唑替尼疗效的相关性。然而,在接受克唑替尼一线治疗的 85 例患者中,未观察到中位无进展生存期(PFS)与通过 adjVAF 评估的 ALK 亚克隆度之间存在统计学关联,而且 adjVAF 与 PFS 的相关性较差。结果表明,通过基于混合捕获的 NGS 确定的 ALK VAF 很可能不适合用于 NSCLC 的 ITH 评估和靶向治疗疗效预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Potential unreliability of ALK variant allele frequency in the efficacy prediction of targeted therapy in NSCLC.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) is the most common fusion gene involved in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and remarkable response has been achieved with the use of ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs). However, the clinical efficacy is highly variable. Pre-existing intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) has been proven to contribute to the poor treatment response and the resistance to targeted therapies. In this work, we investigated whether the variant allele frequencies (VAFs) of ALK fusions can help assess ITH and predict targeted therapy efficacy. Through the application of next-generation sequencing (NGS), 7.2% (326/4548) of patients were detected to be ALK positive. On the basis of the adjusted VAF (adjVAF, VAF normalization for tumor purity) of four different threshold values (adjVAF < 50%, 40%, 30%, or 20%), the association of ALK subclonality with crizotinib efficacy was assessed. Nonetheless, no statistical association was observed between median progression-free survival (PFS) and ALK subclonality assessed by adjVAF, and a poor correlation of adjVAF with PFS was found among the 85 patients who received first-line crizotinib. Results suggest that the ALK VAF determined by hybrid capture-based NGS is probably unreliable for ITH assessment and targeted therapy efficacy prediction in NSCLC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers of Medicine
Frontiers of Medicine ONCOLOGYMEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL&-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
CiteScore
18.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
800
期刊介绍: Frontiers of Medicine is an international general medical journal sponsored by the Ministry of Education of China. The journal is jointly published by the Higher Education Press and Springer. Since the first issue of 2010, this journal has been indexed in PubMed/MEDLINE. Frontiers of Medicine is dedicated to publishing original research and review articles on the latest advances in clinical and basic medicine with a focus on epidemiology, traditional Chinese medicine, translational research, healthcare, public health and health policies.
期刊最新文献
Identification of susceptibility loci and relevant cell type for IgA nephropathy in Han Chinese by integrative genome-wide analysis. Epigenetic modifiers: catalytic or noncatalytic, that is the question. Intracellular checkpoints for NK cell cancer immunotherapy. PAK5-mediated PKM2 phosphorylation is critical for anaerobic glycolysis in endometriosis. Holistic Integrative Medicine Declaration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1