Príncia Grejo Setti, Ricardo Carneiro Borra, Francisco de Menezes Cavalcante Sassi, Marcelo de Bello Cioffi, Hirla Costa Silva Fukushima
{"title":"斑马鱼(Danio rerio)通过热休克产生Gynogenetic:有丝分裂和减数分裂处理的比较。","authors":"Príncia Grejo Setti, Ricardo Carneiro Borra, Francisco de Menezes Cavalcante Sassi, Marcelo de Bello Cioffi, Hirla Costa Silva Fukushima","doi":"10.1089/zeb.2023.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inbred species are useful resources for a variety of biomedical research applications. To create isogenic zebrafish, it is feasible to stop meiosis II (repeatedly) or mitosis (two times) in a haploid embryo by applying pressure or by delivering a heat shock, respectively. In this study, to improve the repeatability, we suggest a less complicated approach based on sperm ultraviolet-C (UV-C) exposure for a shorter period followed by heat shock at various temperatures, eliminating the use of pressure in meiotic therapy since heat shock is more accessible to laboratories. In this study, the survivability rates of meiotic (Mei) and mitotic (Mit) gynogenesis offspring produced by various combinations of irradiation (28.5, 105, and 210 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>) and temperature (Mei: 40.40°C, 40.60°C, or 40.90°C; Mt: 41.40°C, 41.90°C, or 42.45°C) were compared with diploid (C) and haploid (H) controls. Our findings demonstrated that 40.60°C and 41.90°C were the most suitable temperatures to produce meiotic and mitotic gynogenesis, respectively, whereas 28.5 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup> was more successful in ensuring haploid embryos. As a result, we deduced that meiotic gynogenesis produces more viable offspring than the mitotic approach and requires a lower temperature to maintain the second polar body.</p>","PeriodicalId":23872,"journal":{"name":"Zebrafish","volume":" ","pages":"181-188"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Zebrafish (<i>Danio rerio</i>) Gynogenetic Production by Heat Shock: Comparison Between Mitotic and Meiotic Treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Príncia Grejo Setti, Ricardo Carneiro Borra, Francisco de Menezes Cavalcante Sassi, Marcelo de Bello Cioffi, Hirla Costa Silva Fukushima\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/zeb.2023.0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Inbred species are useful resources for a variety of biomedical research applications. To create isogenic zebrafish, it is feasible to stop meiosis II (repeatedly) or mitosis (two times) in a haploid embryo by applying pressure or by delivering a heat shock, respectively. In this study, to improve the repeatability, we suggest a less complicated approach based on sperm ultraviolet-C (UV-C) exposure for a shorter period followed by heat shock at various temperatures, eliminating the use of pressure in meiotic therapy since heat shock is more accessible to laboratories. In this study, the survivability rates of meiotic (Mei) and mitotic (Mit) gynogenesis offspring produced by various combinations of irradiation (28.5, 105, and 210 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>) and temperature (Mei: 40.40°C, 40.60°C, or 40.90°C; Mt: 41.40°C, 41.90°C, or 42.45°C) were compared with diploid (C) and haploid (H) controls. Our findings demonstrated that 40.60°C and 41.90°C were the most suitable temperatures to produce meiotic and mitotic gynogenesis, respectively, whereas 28.5 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup> was more successful in ensuring haploid embryos. As a result, we deduced that meiotic gynogenesis produces more viable offspring than the mitotic approach and requires a lower temperature to maintain the second polar body.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zebrafish\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"181-188\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zebrafish\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/zeb.2023.0013\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zebrafish","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/zeb.2023.0013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Zebrafish (Danio rerio) Gynogenetic Production by Heat Shock: Comparison Between Mitotic and Meiotic Treatment.
Inbred species are useful resources for a variety of biomedical research applications. To create isogenic zebrafish, it is feasible to stop meiosis II (repeatedly) or mitosis (two times) in a haploid embryo by applying pressure or by delivering a heat shock, respectively. In this study, to improve the repeatability, we suggest a less complicated approach based on sperm ultraviolet-C (UV-C) exposure for a shorter period followed by heat shock at various temperatures, eliminating the use of pressure in meiotic therapy since heat shock is more accessible to laboratories. In this study, the survivability rates of meiotic (Mei) and mitotic (Mit) gynogenesis offspring produced by various combinations of irradiation (28.5, 105, and 210 mJ/cm2) and temperature (Mei: 40.40°C, 40.60°C, or 40.90°C; Mt: 41.40°C, 41.90°C, or 42.45°C) were compared with diploid (C) and haploid (H) controls. Our findings demonstrated that 40.60°C and 41.90°C were the most suitable temperatures to produce meiotic and mitotic gynogenesis, respectively, whereas 28.5 mJ/cm2 was more successful in ensuring haploid embryos. As a result, we deduced that meiotic gynogenesis produces more viable offspring than the mitotic approach and requires a lower temperature to maintain the second polar body.
期刊介绍:
Zebrafish is the only peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the central role of zebrafish and other aquarium species as models for the study of vertebrate development, evolution, toxicology, and human disease.
Due to its prolific reproduction and the external development of the transparent embryo, the zebrafish is a prime model for genetic and developmental studies. While genetically more distant from humans, the vertebrate zebrafish nevertheless has comparable organs and tissues, such as heart, kidney, pancreas, bones, and cartilage.
Zebrafish introduced the new section TechnoFish, which highlights these innovations for the general zebrafish community.
TechnoFish features two types of articles:
TechnoFish Previews: Important, generally useful technical advances or valuable transgenic lines
TechnoFish Methods: Brief descriptions of new methods, reagents, or transgenic lines that will be of widespread use in the zebrafish community
Zebrafish coverage includes:
Comparative genomics and evolution
Molecular/cellular mechanisms of cell growth
Genetic analysis of embryogenesis and disease
Toxicological and infectious disease models
Models for neurological disorders and aging
New methods, tools, and experimental approaches
Zebrafish also includes research with other aquarium species such as medaka, Fugu, and Xiphophorus.