医生驱动的质量改进管理干预使用精益六西格玛改善社区获得性肺炎患者护理。

Lea M Monday, Omid Yazdanpaneh, Caleb Sokolowski, Jane Chi, Ryan Kuhn, Kareem Bazzy, Sorabh Dhar
{"title":"医生驱动的质量改进管理干预使用精益六西格玛改善社区获得性肺炎患者护理。","authors":"Lea M Monday,&nbsp;Omid Yazdanpaneh,&nbsp;Caleb Sokolowski,&nbsp;Jane Chi,&nbsp;Ryan Kuhn,&nbsp;Kareem Bazzy,&nbsp;Sorabh Dhar","doi":"10.36401/JQSH-21-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) recommends a minimum of 5 days of antibiotic therapy in stable patients who have community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). However, excessive duration of therapy (DOT) is common. Define, measure, analyze, improve, and control (DMAIC) is a Lean Six Sigma methodology used in quality improvement efforts, including infection control; however, the utility of this approach for antimicrobial stewardship initiatives is unknown. To determine the impact of a prospective physician-driven stewardship intervention on excess antibiotic DOT and clinical outcomes of patients hospitalized with CAP. Our specific aim was to reduce excess DOT and to determine why some providers treat beyond the IDSA minimum DOT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center, quasi-experimental quality improvement study evaluating rates of excess antimicrobial DOT before and after implementing a DMAIC-based antimicrobial stewardship intervention that included education, prospective audit, and feedback from a physician peer, and daily tracking of excess DOT on a Kaizen board. The baseline period included retrospective CAP cases that occurred between October 2018 and February 2019 (control group). The intervention period included CAP cases between October 2019 and February 2020 (intervention group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 123 CAP patients were included (57 control and 66 intervention). Median antibiotic DOT per patient decreased (8 versus 5 days; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and the proportion of patients treated for the IDSA minimum increased (5.3% versus 56%; <i>p</i> < 0.001) after the intervention. No differences in mortality, readmission, length of stay, or incidence of <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection were observed between groups. Almost half of the caregivers surveyed were aware that as few as 5 days of antibiotic treatment could be appropriate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A physician-driven antimicrobial quality improvement initiative designed using DMAIC methodology led to reduced DOT and increased compliance with the IDSA treatment guidelines for hospitalized patients with CAP reduced without negatively affecting clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73170,"journal":{"name":"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10228994/pdf/i2589-9449-4-3-109.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Physician-Driven Quality Improvement Stewardship Intervention Using Lean Six Sigma Improves Patient Care for Community-Acquired Pneumonia.\",\"authors\":\"Lea M Monday,&nbsp;Omid Yazdanpaneh,&nbsp;Caleb Sokolowski,&nbsp;Jane Chi,&nbsp;Ryan Kuhn,&nbsp;Kareem Bazzy,&nbsp;Sorabh Dhar\",\"doi\":\"10.36401/JQSH-21-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) recommends a minimum of 5 days of antibiotic therapy in stable patients who have community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). However, excessive duration of therapy (DOT) is common. Define, measure, analyze, improve, and control (DMAIC) is a Lean Six Sigma methodology used in quality improvement efforts, including infection control; however, the utility of this approach for antimicrobial stewardship initiatives is unknown. To determine the impact of a prospective physician-driven stewardship intervention on excess antibiotic DOT and clinical outcomes of patients hospitalized with CAP. Our specific aim was to reduce excess DOT and to determine why some providers treat beyond the IDSA minimum DOT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center, quasi-experimental quality improvement study evaluating rates of excess antimicrobial DOT before and after implementing a DMAIC-based antimicrobial stewardship intervention that included education, prospective audit, and feedback from a physician peer, and daily tracking of excess DOT on a Kaizen board. The baseline period included retrospective CAP cases that occurred between October 2018 and February 2019 (control group). The intervention period included CAP cases between October 2019 and February 2020 (intervention group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 123 CAP patients were included (57 control and 66 intervention). Median antibiotic DOT per patient decreased (8 versus 5 days; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and the proportion of patients treated for the IDSA minimum increased (5.3% versus 56%; <i>p</i> < 0.001) after the intervention. No differences in mortality, readmission, length of stay, or incidence of <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection were observed between groups. Almost half of the caregivers surveyed were aware that as few as 5 days of antibiotic treatment could be appropriate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A physician-driven antimicrobial quality improvement initiative designed using DMAIC methodology led to reduced DOT and increased compliance with the IDSA treatment guidelines for hospitalized patients with CAP reduced without negatively affecting clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10228994/pdf/i2589-9449-4-3-109.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36401/JQSH-21-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36401/JQSH-21-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

美国传染病学会(IDSA)建议对社区获得性肺炎(CAP)病情稳定的患者进行至少5天的抗生素治疗。然而,治疗时间过长(DOT)是常见的。定义、测量、分析、改进和控制(DMAIC)是一种精益六西格玛方法,用于质量改进工作,包括感染控制;然而,这种方法对抗菌剂管理倡议的效用是未知的。确定医生驱动的前瞻性管理干预对过量抗生素DOT和CAP住院患者临床结果的影响。我们的具体目标是减少过量DOT,并确定为什么一些提供者的治疗超过了IDSA最低DOT。方法:一项单中心、准实验质量改进研究,评估实施基于dmaic的抗菌药物管理干预前后的过量抗菌药物DOT率,干预包括教育、前瞻性审核、医师同行反馈,以及在改善板上对过量抗菌药物DOT进行每日跟踪。基线期包括2018年10月至2019年2月期间发生的回顾性CAP病例(对照组)。干预期包括2019年10月至2020年2月(干预组)的CAP病例。结果:共纳入123例CAP患者(对照组57例,干预组66例)。每位患者抗生素DOT中位数下降(8天和5天;p < 0.001),接受最低IDSA治疗的患者比例增加(5.3%对56%;P < 0.001)。两组患者的死亡率、再入院率、住院时间或艰难梭菌感染发生率均无差异。接受调查的护理人员中几乎有一半意识到,5天的抗生素治疗可能是合适的。结论:采用DMAIC方法设计的医生驱动的抗菌药物质量改进倡议减少了DOT,增加了住院CAP患者对IDSA治疗指南的依从性,而没有对临床结果产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Physician-Driven Quality Improvement Stewardship Intervention Using Lean Six Sigma Improves Patient Care for Community-Acquired Pneumonia.

Introduction: The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) recommends a minimum of 5 days of antibiotic therapy in stable patients who have community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). However, excessive duration of therapy (DOT) is common. Define, measure, analyze, improve, and control (DMAIC) is a Lean Six Sigma methodology used in quality improvement efforts, including infection control; however, the utility of this approach for antimicrobial stewardship initiatives is unknown. To determine the impact of a prospective physician-driven stewardship intervention on excess antibiotic DOT and clinical outcomes of patients hospitalized with CAP. Our specific aim was to reduce excess DOT and to determine why some providers treat beyond the IDSA minimum DOT.

Methods: A single-center, quasi-experimental quality improvement study evaluating rates of excess antimicrobial DOT before and after implementing a DMAIC-based antimicrobial stewardship intervention that included education, prospective audit, and feedback from a physician peer, and daily tracking of excess DOT on a Kaizen board. The baseline period included retrospective CAP cases that occurred between October 2018 and February 2019 (control group). The intervention period included CAP cases between October 2019 and February 2020 (intervention group).

Results: A total of 123 CAP patients were included (57 control and 66 intervention). Median antibiotic DOT per patient decreased (8 versus 5 days; p < 0.001), and the proportion of patients treated for the IDSA minimum increased (5.3% versus 56%; p < 0.001) after the intervention. No differences in mortality, readmission, length of stay, or incidence of Clostridioides difficile infection were observed between groups. Almost half of the caregivers surveyed were aware that as few as 5 days of antibiotic treatment could be appropriate.

Conclusions: A physician-driven antimicrobial quality improvement initiative designed using DMAIC methodology led to reduced DOT and increased compliance with the IDSA treatment guidelines for hospitalized patients with CAP reduced without negatively affecting clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploration of Mental Health and Well-Being of Healthcare Professionals During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Transforming Hospital Quality Improvement Through Harnessing the Power of Artificial Intelligence. Transforming Hospital Housekeeping: The Kayakalp Journey Patient-Centered Healthcare: From Patient Experience to Human Experience Reply to Blom: Drugs Do Not Work in Patients Who Cannot Tolerate Them
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1