糖尿病预防干预早期减肥成功率的性别差异。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American journal of health behavior Pub Date : 2023-04-30 DOI:10.5993/AJHB.47.2.13
Carla K Miller, Haikady N Nagaraja, Jennifer S Cheavens, Kentaro Fujita, Sophie A Lazarus, Daniel S Brunette
{"title":"糖尿病预防干预早期减肥成功率的性别差异。","authors":"Carla K Miller, Haikady N Nagaraja, Jennifer S Cheavens, Kentaro Fujita, Sophie A Lazarus, Daniel S Brunette","doi":"10.5993/AJHB.47.2.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Males often lose more weight than females during treatment, and early weight loss predicts weight loss longer-term. Yet, mechanisms for sex differences in early weight loss are unknown and were examined in this study.<b>Methods:</b> Adults≥21 years old with overweight or obesity and prediabetes (N=206) participated in a lifestyle intervention and completed baseline psychosocial questionnaires. Percent weight loss, session attendance, and number of days participants self-monitored dietary intake and weight were determined at week 5. Principal components, regression, and mediation analyses were conducted to determine whether weight loss differed by sex and potential mediators of weight change. <b>Results:</b> Mean (±SD) weight loss was greater for males (2.59±1.62%) than females (2.05±1.54%; p=.02). Attendance, self-monitoring, and beliefs regarding disease risk were independent predictors of weight loss (all p<.05) but did not explain sex differences. The association between attendance and weight loss was stronger for males than females (p<.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> Additional research is needed to identify mechanisms that explain sex differences in early weight loss. However, strengthening risk beliefs, attendance, and self-monitoring may promote greater early weight loss for all participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":7699,"journal":{"name":"American journal of health behavior","volume":"47 2","pages":"337-348"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418087/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex Differences in Early Weight Loss Success During a Diabetes Prevention Intervention.\",\"authors\":\"Carla K Miller, Haikady N Nagaraja, Jennifer S Cheavens, Kentaro Fujita, Sophie A Lazarus, Daniel S Brunette\",\"doi\":\"10.5993/AJHB.47.2.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Males often lose more weight than females during treatment, and early weight loss predicts weight loss longer-term. Yet, mechanisms for sex differences in early weight loss are unknown and were examined in this study.<b>Methods:</b> Adults≥21 years old with overweight or obesity and prediabetes (N=206) participated in a lifestyle intervention and completed baseline psychosocial questionnaires. Percent weight loss, session attendance, and number of days participants self-monitored dietary intake and weight were determined at week 5. Principal components, regression, and mediation analyses were conducted to determine whether weight loss differed by sex and potential mediators of weight change. <b>Results:</b> Mean (±SD) weight loss was greater for males (2.59±1.62%) than females (2.05±1.54%; p=.02). Attendance, self-monitoring, and beliefs regarding disease risk were independent predictors of weight loss (all p<.05) but did not explain sex differences. The association between attendance and weight loss was stronger for males than females (p<.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> Additional research is needed to identify mechanisms that explain sex differences in early weight loss. However, strengthening risk beliefs, attendance, and self-monitoring may promote greater early weight loss for all participants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of health behavior\",\"volume\":\"47 2\",\"pages\":\"337-348\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418087/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of health behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.47.2.13\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of health behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.47.2.13","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:在治疗过程中,男性的体重减轻往往多于女性,而且早期体重减轻可预测长期体重减轻。然而,早期体重减轻的性别差异机制尚不清楚,本研究对其进行了研究:方法:年龄≥21 岁的超重或肥胖及糖尿病前期成人(206 人)参加了生活方式干预,并填写了基线社会心理问卷。第 5 周时确定体重减轻百分比、疗程出席率以及参与者自我监测饮食摄入量和体重的天数。研究人员进行了主成分分析、回归分析和中介分析,以确定体重减轻是否因性别而异,以及体重变化的潜在中介因素。结果男性的平均(±SD)体重减轻率(2.59±1.62%)高于女性(2.05±1.54%;P=0.02)。出勤率、自我监控和对疾病风险的信念是体重减轻的独立预测因素(均为 p):还需要进行更多的研究,以确定早期体重减轻的性别差异机制。不过,加强风险信念、出席率和自我监控可能会促进所有参与者更早地减轻体重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sex Differences in Early Weight Loss Success During a Diabetes Prevention Intervention.

Objectives: Males often lose more weight than females during treatment, and early weight loss predicts weight loss longer-term. Yet, mechanisms for sex differences in early weight loss are unknown and were examined in this study.Methods: Adults≥21 years old with overweight or obesity and prediabetes (N=206) participated in a lifestyle intervention and completed baseline psychosocial questionnaires. Percent weight loss, session attendance, and number of days participants self-monitored dietary intake and weight were determined at week 5. Principal components, regression, and mediation analyses were conducted to determine whether weight loss differed by sex and potential mediators of weight change. Results: Mean (±SD) weight loss was greater for males (2.59±1.62%) than females (2.05±1.54%; p=.02). Attendance, self-monitoring, and beliefs regarding disease risk were independent predictors of weight loss (all p<.05) but did not explain sex differences. The association between attendance and weight loss was stronger for males than females (p<.05). Conclusions: Additional research is needed to identify mechanisms that explain sex differences in early weight loss. However, strengthening risk beliefs, attendance, and self-monitoring may promote greater early weight loss for all participants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of health behavior
American journal of health behavior PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The Journal seeks to improve the quality of life through multidisciplinary health efforts in fostering a better understanding of the multidimensional nature of both individuals and social systems as they relate to health behaviors.
期刊最新文献
Characterization of early non-responders within behavioral weight loss treatment. Student Perspectives on Campus Tobacco Policy: A Photovoice Study Efficacy of An Immersive Nature-based Virtual Reality Program on Depression, Emotional Health, and Qualityof-Life among Care Facility Residents with Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) and its Related Dementias (ADRD) Effect of Early Rehabilitation Nursing on Patients with Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-analysis Analysis of Awareness Status and Factors Influencing Different Populations towards Public Health Emergencies during the COVID-19 Pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1