Orkun Eroğlu, Yeşim Eroğlu, Muhammed Yıldırım, Turgut Karlıdag, Ahmet Çınar, Abdulvahap Akyiğit, İrfan Kaygusuz, Hanefi Yıldırım, Erol Keleş, Şinasi Yalçın
{"title":"基于计算机断层扫描的人工智能建模与磁共振成像在胆脂瘤诊断中的比较。","authors":"Orkun Eroğlu, Yeşim Eroğlu, Muhammed Yıldırım, Turgut Karlıdag, Ahmet Çınar, Abdulvahap Akyiğit, İrfan Kaygusuz, Hanefi Yıldırım, Erol Keleş, Şinasi Yalçın","doi":"10.5152/iao.2023.221004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this study, we aimed to compare the success rates of computed tomography image-based artificial intelligence models and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of preoperative cholesteatoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The files of 75 patients who underwent tympanomastoid surgery with the diagnosis of chronic otitis media between January 2010 and January 2021 in our clinic were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were classified into the chronic otitis group without cholesteatoma (n=34) and the chronic otitis group with cholesteatoma (n=41) according to the presence of cholesteatoma at surgery. A dataset was created from the preoperative computed tomography images of the patients. In this dataset, the success rates of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma were determined by using the most frequently used artificial intelligence models in the literature. In addition, preoperative MRI were evaluated and the success rates were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the artificial intelligence architectures used in the paper, the lowest result was obtained in MobileNetV2 with an accuracy of 83.30%, while the highest result was obtained in DenseNet201 with an accuracy of 90.99%. In our paper, the specificity of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma was 88.23% and the sensitivity was 87.80%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, we showed that artificial intelligence can be used with similar reliability to magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma. This is the first study that, to our knowledge, compares magnetic resonance imaging with artificial intelligence models for the purpose of identifying preoperative cholesteatomas.</p>","PeriodicalId":54793,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Advanced Otology","volume":"19 4","pages":"342-349"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4c/23/jiao-19-4-342.PMC10544284.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Computed Tomography-Based Artificial Intelligence Modeling and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosis of Cholesteatoma.\",\"authors\":\"Orkun Eroğlu, Yeşim Eroğlu, Muhammed Yıldırım, Turgut Karlıdag, Ahmet Çınar, Abdulvahap Akyiğit, İrfan Kaygusuz, Hanefi Yıldırım, Erol Keleş, Şinasi Yalçın\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/iao.2023.221004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this study, we aimed to compare the success rates of computed tomography image-based artificial intelligence models and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of preoperative cholesteatoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The files of 75 patients who underwent tympanomastoid surgery with the diagnosis of chronic otitis media between January 2010 and January 2021 in our clinic were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were classified into the chronic otitis group without cholesteatoma (n=34) and the chronic otitis group with cholesteatoma (n=41) according to the presence of cholesteatoma at surgery. A dataset was created from the preoperative computed tomography images of the patients. In this dataset, the success rates of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma were determined by using the most frequently used artificial intelligence models in the literature. In addition, preoperative MRI were evaluated and the success rates were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the artificial intelligence architectures used in the paper, the lowest result was obtained in MobileNetV2 with an accuracy of 83.30%, while the highest result was obtained in DenseNet201 with an accuracy of 90.99%. In our paper, the specificity of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma was 88.23% and the sensitivity was 87.80%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, we showed that artificial intelligence can be used with similar reliability to magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma. This is the first study that, to our knowledge, compares magnetic resonance imaging with artificial intelligence models for the purpose of identifying preoperative cholesteatomas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Advanced Otology\",\"volume\":\"19 4\",\"pages\":\"342-349\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4c/23/jiao-19-4-342.PMC10544284.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Advanced Otology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2023.221004\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Advanced Otology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2023.221004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Computed Tomography-Based Artificial Intelligence Modeling and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosis of Cholesteatoma.
Background: In this study, we aimed to compare the success rates of computed tomography image-based artificial intelligence models and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of preoperative cholesteatoma.
Methods: The files of 75 patients who underwent tympanomastoid surgery with the diagnosis of chronic otitis media between January 2010 and January 2021 in our clinic were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were classified into the chronic otitis group without cholesteatoma (n=34) and the chronic otitis group with cholesteatoma (n=41) according to the presence of cholesteatoma at surgery. A dataset was created from the preoperative computed tomography images of the patients. In this dataset, the success rates of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma were determined by using the most frequently used artificial intelligence models in the literature. In addition, preoperative MRI were evaluated and the success rates were compared.
Results: Among the artificial intelligence architectures used in the paper, the lowest result was obtained in MobileNetV2 with an accuracy of 83.30%, while the highest result was obtained in DenseNet201 with an accuracy of 90.99%. In our paper, the specificity of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma was 88.23% and the sensitivity was 87.80%.
Conclusion: In this study, we showed that artificial intelligence can be used with similar reliability to magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma. This is the first study that, to our knowledge, compares magnetic resonance imaging with artificial intelligence models for the purpose of identifying preoperative cholesteatomas.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of International Advanced Otology (IAO – Citation Abbreviation: J Int Adv Otol) is an open access double-blind peer-reviewed, international publication. The Journal of International Advanced Otology is fully sponsored and owned by the European Academy of Otology and Neurotology and the Politzer Society. The Journal of International Advanced Otology is published 3 times per year on April, August, December and its publication language is English.
The scope of the Journal is limited with otology, neurotology, audiology (excluding linguistics) and skull base medicine.
The Journal of International Advanced Otology aims to publish manuscripts at the highest clinical and scientific level. IAO publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research, review articles, short reports and a limited number of case reports. Controversial patient discussions, communications on emerging technology, and historical issues will also be considered for publication.