下颌第一磨牙单冠种植体不同放置位置对牙周健康和边缘骨流失的影响。

Ömür Dereci, Emre Mumcu, Gunay Gojayeva, Çağatay Dayan
{"title":"下颌第一磨牙单冠种植体不同放置位置对牙周健康和边缘骨流失的影响。","authors":"Ömür Dereci,&nbsp;Emre Mumcu,&nbsp;Gunay Gojayeva,&nbsp;Çağatay Dayan","doi":"10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2022044552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the present study is to compare the periodontal health and marginal bone loss (MBL) between single-crown dental implants placed interdentally and mesial to the edentulous space. Patients treated with single-crown dental implants between 01/04/2014 and 01/04/2021 were included in the study. The included patients were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 consisted of single implant crowns inserted interdentally with a distal neighboring mandibular second molar and Group 2 consisted of single molar implant crowns inserted distally to the second premolar tooth without a neighboring second molar. The measurements for probing pocket depth, gingival index, and plaque index were made in both groups at the 60-month control session to evaluate periodontal health of the single-crown dental implants. The marginal bone levels of distal and mesial aspects of all implants were measured at the 60-month control session on panoramic radiographs. Forty-six and sixty-one patients were included in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. There was a significantly higher distal MBL in Group 2 compared with Group 1 (P < 0.05). Mesial MBL was higher in Group 1, however, this difference was not significant. The periodontal parameters of probing pocket depth, gingival index, and PI were all significantly higher in Group 1 compared with Group 2 at the 60-month control evaluation (P < 0.05). Single-crown dental implants placed interdentally may show decreased distal MBL and periodontal health compared with single-crown dental implants placed mesial to the edentulous space.</p>","PeriodicalId":16125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of long-term effects of medical implants","volume":"33 4","pages":"59-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Periodontal Health and Marginal Bone Loss in Mandibular First Molar Single-Crown Dental Implants Placed in Different Positions.\",\"authors\":\"Ömür Dereci,&nbsp;Emre Mumcu,&nbsp;Gunay Gojayeva,&nbsp;Çağatay Dayan\",\"doi\":\"10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2022044552\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of the present study is to compare the periodontal health and marginal bone loss (MBL) between single-crown dental implants placed interdentally and mesial to the edentulous space. Patients treated with single-crown dental implants between 01/04/2014 and 01/04/2021 were included in the study. The included patients were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 consisted of single implant crowns inserted interdentally with a distal neighboring mandibular second molar and Group 2 consisted of single molar implant crowns inserted distally to the second premolar tooth without a neighboring second molar. The measurements for probing pocket depth, gingival index, and plaque index were made in both groups at the 60-month control session to evaluate periodontal health of the single-crown dental implants. The marginal bone levels of distal and mesial aspects of all implants were measured at the 60-month control session on panoramic radiographs. Forty-six and sixty-one patients were included in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. There was a significantly higher distal MBL in Group 2 compared with Group 1 (P < 0.05). Mesial MBL was higher in Group 1, however, this difference was not significant. The periodontal parameters of probing pocket depth, gingival index, and PI were all significantly higher in Group 1 compared with Group 2 at the 60-month control evaluation (P < 0.05). Single-crown dental implants placed interdentally may show decreased distal MBL and periodontal health compared with single-crown dental implants placed mesial to the edentulous space.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of long-term effects of medical implants\",\"volume\":\"33 4\",\"pages\":\"59-65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of long-term effects of medical implants\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2022044552\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of long-term effects of medical implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2022044552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是比较单冠种植体的牙周健康和边缘骨质流失(MBL)之间放置在牙间和近端无牙间隙。2014年4月1日至2021年4月1日期间接受单冠种植体治疗的患者纳入研究。纳入的患者分为两组。组1为单牙种植冠内嵌,下颌第二磨牙远端相邻;组2为单牙种植冠在下颌第二前磨牙远端无相邻第二磨牙。在60个月的对照组中,测量两组的探查袋深度、牙龈指数和菌斑指数,以评估单冠种植体的牙周健康状况。在60个月的对照期间,通过全景x线片测量所有种植体的远端和中端边缘骨水平。1组46例,2组61例。2组远端MBL明显高于1组(P < 0.05)。组1中位MBL较高,但差异不显著。60个月对照评估时,组1牙周指标探诊袋深度、牙龈指数、PI均显著高于组2 (P < 0.05)。与放置在无牙间隙内的单冠种植体相比,放置在间隙内的单冠种植体可能显示远端MBL和牙周健康下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Periodontal Health and Marginal Bone Loss in Mandibular First Molar Single-Crown Dental Implants Placed in Different Positions.

The aim of the present study is to compare the periodontal health and marginal bone loss (MBL) between single-crown dental implants placed interdentally and mesial to the edentulous space. Patients treated with single-crown dental implants between 01/04/2014 and 01/04/2021 were included in the study. The included patients were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 consisted of single implant crowns inserted interdentally with a distal neighboring mandibular second molar and Group 2 consisted of single molar implant crowns inserted distally to the second premolar tooth without a neighboring second molar. The measurements for probing pocket depth, gingival index, and plaque index were made in both groups at the 60-month control session to evaluate periodontal health of the single-crown dental implants. The marginal bone levels of distal and mesial aspects of all implants were measured at the 60-month control session on panoramic radiographs. Forty-six and sixty-one patients were included in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. There was a significantly higher distal MBL in Group 2 compared with Group 1 (P < 0.05). Mesial MBL was higher in Group 1, however, this difference was not significant. The periodontal parameters of probing pocket depth, gingival index, and PI were all significantly higher in Group 1 compared with Group 2 at the 60-month control evaluation (P < 0.05). Single-crown dental implants placed interdentally may show decreased distal MBL and periodontal health compared with single-crown dental implants placed mesial to the edentulous space.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: MEDICAL IMPLANTS are being used in every organ of the human body. Ideally, medical implants must have biomechanical properties comparable to those of autogenous tissues without any adverse effects. In each anatomic site, studies of the long-term effects of medical implants must be undertaken to determine accurately the safety and performance of the implants. Today, implant surgery has become an interdisciplinary undertaking involving a number of skilled and gifted specialists. For example, successful cochlear implants will involve audiologists, audiological physicians, speech and language therapists, otolaryngologists, nurses, neuro-otologists, teachers of the deaf, hearing therapists, cochlear implant manufacturers, and others involved with hearing-impaired and deaf individuals.
期刊最新文献
All-Polyethylene Tibias Equal to Metal-Backed Tibias in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clinical Experience of Dissolvable Calcium Sulfate (Stimulan) Carrier for Antibiotic Delivery in Orthopedic Surgery: A Study of 143 Patients. Do Cementless, Collared Stems Prevent Aseptic Loosening, Subsidence, and Periprosthetic Fracture in Total Hip Arthroplasty? Efficacy of a Surgical versus a Nonsurgical Approach in the Treatment of Peri-Implant Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Evaluation of Edentulous Maxillary and Mandibular Full Arch Implant Supported Rehabilitation Using the All-on-Four Treatment Concept: An 8-Year Follow-Up Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1