病人以俯卧位转运至局部体外膜氧合中心的结果:一项回顾性队列研究。

Timothy Zhang, Anton Nikouline, Jamie Riggs, Brodie Nolan, Andy Pan, Michael Peddle, Eddy Fan, Lorenzo Del Sorbo, John Granton
{"title":"病人以俯卧位转运至局部体外膜氧合中心的结果:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Timothy Zhang,&nbsp;Anton Nikouline,&nbsp;Jamie Riggs,&nbsp;Brodie Nolan,&nbsp;Andy Pan,&nbsp;Michael Peddle,&nbsp;Eddy Fan,&nbsp;Lorenzo Del Sorbo,&nbsp;John Granton","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prone positioning is associated with improved mortality in patients with moderate/severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and has been increasingly used throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. In patients with refractory hypoxemia, transfer to an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) center may improve outcome but may be challenging due to severely compromised gas exchange. Transport of these patients in prone position may be advantageous; however, there is a paucity of data on their outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective of this retrospective cohort study was to describe the early outcomes of ARDS patients transported in prone position for evaluation at a regional ECMO center. A secondary objective was to examine the safety of their transport in the prone position.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This study used patient charts from Ornge and Toronto General Hospital in Ontario, Canada, between February 1, 2020, and November 31, 2021.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patient with ARDS transported in the prone position for ECMO evaluation to Toronto General Hospital.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Descriptive analysis of patients transported in the prone position and their outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred fifteen patients were included. Seventy-two received ECMO (63%) and 51 died (44%) with ARDS and sepsis as the most common listed causes of death. Patients were transported primarily for COVID-related indications (93%). Few patients required additional analgesia (8%), vasopressors (4%), or experienced clinically relevant desaturation during transport (2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This cohort of patients with severe ARDS transported in prone position had outcomes ranging from similar to better compared with existing literature. Prone transport was performed safely with few complications or escalation in treatments. Prone transport to an ECMO center should be regarded as safe and potentially beneficial for patients with ARDS and refractory hypoxemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":10759,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Explorations","volume":"5 7","pages":"e0948"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9b/7b/cc9-5-e0948.PMC10365187.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Patients Transported in the Prone Position to a Regional Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Center: A Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Timothy Zhang,&nbsp;Anton Nikouline,&nbsp;Jamie Riggs,&nbsp;Brodie Nolan,&nbsp;Andy Pan,&nbsp;Michael Peddle,&nbsp;Eddy Fan,&nbsp;Lorenzo Del Sorbo,&nbsp;John Granton\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Prone positioning is associated with improved mortality in patients with moderate/severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and has been increasingly used throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. In patients with refractory hypoxemia, transfer to an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) center may improve outcome but may be challenging due to severely compromised gas exchange. Transport of these patients in prone position may be advantageous; however, there is a paucity of data on their outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective of this retrospective cohort study was to describe the early outcomes of ARDS patients transported in prone position for evaluation at a regional ECMO center. A secondary objective was to examine the safety of their transport in the prone position.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This study used patient charts from Ornge and Toronto General Hospital in Ontario, Canada, between February 1, 2020, and November 31, 2021.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patient with ARDS transported in the prone position for ECMO evaluation to Toronto General Hospital.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Descriptive analysis of patients transported in the prone position and their outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred fifteen patients were included. Seventy-two received ECMO (63%) and 51 died (44%) with ARDS and sepsis as the most common listed causes of death. Patients were transported primarily for COVID-related indications (93%). Few patients required additional analgesia (8%), vasopressors (4%), or experienced clinically relevant desaturation during transport (2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This cohort of patients with severe ARDS transported in prone position had outcomes ranging from similar to better compared with existing literature. Prone transport was performed safely with few complications or escalation in treatments. Prone transport to an ECMO center should be regarded as safe and potentially beneficial for patients with ARDS and refractory hypoxemia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Explorations\",\"volume\":\"5 7\",\"pages\":\"e0948\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9b/7b/cc9-5-e0948.PMC10365187.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Explorations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000948\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

俯卧位与中/重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者的死亡率降低有关,在COVID-19大流行期间已越来越多地使用俯卧位。对于难治性低氧血症患者,转移到体外膜氧合(ECMO)中心可能会改善结果,但由于气体交换严重受损,可能具有挑战性。这些患者以俯卧位转运可能是有利的;然而,缺乏关于其结果的数据。目的:本回顾性队列研究的主要目的是描述在区域ECMO中心评估的俯卧位ARDS患者的早期结果。第二个目的是检查他们以俯卧姿势运输的安全性。设计:回顾性队列研究。背景:本研究使用了2020年2月1日至2021年11月31日期间加拿大安大略省奥兰治和多伦多总医院的患者图表。参与者:ARDS患者以俯卧位送往多伦多总医院进行ECMO评估。主要结局和措施:对俯卧位转运患者及其结局进行描述性分析。结果:纳入115例患者。72例接受ECMO(63%), 51例死亡(44%),ARDS和败血症是最常见的死亡原因。患者主要因covid相关指征被转移(93%)。很少有患者需要额外的镇痛(8%),血管加压剂(4%),或在运输过程中经历临床相关的去饱和(2%)。结论和相关性:与现有文献相比,这组严重ARDS患者俯卧位转运的结果相似或更好。俯卧转运是安全的,几乎没有并发症或治疗升级。对于伴有ARDS和难治性低氧血症的患者,易发转运至ECMO中心应被认为是安全且潜在有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcomes of Patients Transported in the Prone Position to a Regional Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Center: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Prone positioning is associated with improved mortality in patients with moderate/severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and has been increasingly used throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. In patients with refractory hypoxemia, transfer to an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) center may improve outcome but may be challenging due to severely compromised gas exchange. Transport of these patients in prone position may be advantageous; however, there is a paucity of data on their outcomes.

Objectives: The primary objective of this retrospective cohort study was to describe the early outcomes of ARDS patients transported in prone position for evaluation at a regional ECMO center. A secondary objective was to examine the safety of their transport in the prone position.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: This study used patient charts from Ornge and Toronto General Hospital in Ontario, Canada, between February 1, 2020, and November 31, 2021.

Participants: Patient with ARDS transported in the prone position for ECMO evaluation to Toronto General Hospital.

Main outcomes and measures: Descriptive analysis of patients transported in the prone position and their outcomes.

Results: One hundred fifteen patients were included. Seventy-two received ECMO (63%) and 51 died (44%) with ARDS and sepsis as the most common listed causes of death. Patients were transported primarily for COVID-related indications (93%). Few patients required additional analgesia (8%), vasopressors (4%), or experienced clinically relevant desaturation during transport (2%).

Conclusions and relevance: This cohort of patients with severe ARDS transported in prone position had outcomes ranging from similar to better compared with existing literature. Prone transport was performed safely with few complications or escalation in treatments. Prone transport to an ECMO center should be regarded as safe and potentially beneficial for patients with ARDS and refractory hypoxemia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A New Dosing Frontier: Retrospective Assessment of Effluent Flow Rates and Residual Renal Function Among Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Hemodynamic Determinants of Cardiac Surgery-Associated Acute Kidney Injury Racial Differences in Accuracy of Predictive Models for High-Flow Nasal Cannula Failure in COVID-19 Knowledge and Practice Gaps in Pediatric Neurocritical Care Nursing: Lessons Learned From a Specialized Educational Boot Camp Unifying Fluid Responsiveness and Tolerance With Physiology: A Dynamic Interpretation of the Diamond–Forrester Classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1