{"title":"用内窥镜治疗痔疮。","authors":"Syed Matthew Kodilinye, Anthony N Kalloo","doi":"10.1097/MOG.0000000000000960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To review the literature within the last 5 years on the current status and future perspectives of the endoscopic management of internal hemorrhoids.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Despite the large burden of hemorrhoidal diseases, research in this area, particularly on endoscopic approaches for treatment, has been slow. Within the last 5 years, data has been published on the novel cap-assisted endoscopic sclerotherapy (CAES), which will continue to gain attention in the future. Rubber band ligation has been adopted by the endoscopist as endoscopic rubber band ligation (ERBL), demonstrating satisfactory results in treating symptomatic hemorrhoids, although mild postprocedure complications are common. Data is needed on head-to-head comparisons between ERBL, endoscopic sclerotherapy, and CAES. Other methods, such as coagulation, are understudied and should be explored further in the endoscopic setting. Meaningful comparisons between treatment methods for internal hemorrhoids have been difficult because of variations in interventional techniques and methods, differences in the grading of hemorrhoids, and lack of standardization of clinical trials. The Goligher classification alone is inadequate for determining the management of symptomatic hemorrhoids and this warrants revision.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Gastroenterologists are poised to assume a greater role in the management of internal hemorrhoids with flexible endoscopy. Current endoscopic treatment options require further study.</p>","PeriodicalId":50607,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Gastroenterology","volume":"39 5","pages":"375-380"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic approaches to the management of hemorrhoids.\",\"authors\":\"Syed Matthew Kodilinye, Anthony N Kalloo\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MOG.0000000000000960\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To review the literature within the last 5 years on the current status and future perspectives of the endoscopic management of internal hemorrhoids.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Despite the large burden of hemorrhoidal diseases, research in this area, particularly on endoscopic approaches for treatment, has been slow. Within the last 5 years, data has been published on the novel cap-assisted endoscopic sclerotherapy (CAES), which will continue to gain attention in the future. Rubber band ligation has been adopted by the endoscopist as endoscopic rubber band ligation (ERBL), demonstrating satisfactory results in treating symptomatic hemorrhoids, although mild postprocedure complications are common. Data is needed on head-to-head comparisons between ERBL, endoscopic sclerotherapy, and CAES. Other methods, such as coagulation, are understudied and should be explored further in the endoscopic setting. Meaningful comparisons between treatment methods for internal hemorrhoids have been difficult because of variations in interventional techniques and methods, differences in the grading of hemorrhoids, and lack of standardization of clinical trials. The Goligher classification alone is inadequate for determining the management of symptomatic hemorrhoids and this warrants revision.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Gastroenterologists are poised to assume a greater role in the management of internal hemorrhoids with flexible endoscopy. Current endoscopic treatment options require further study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"39 5\",\"pages\":\"375-380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOG.0000000000000960\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOG.0000000000000960","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Endoscopic approaches to the management of hemorrhoids.
Purpose of review: To review the literature within the last 5 years on the current status and future perspectives of the endoscopic management of internal hemorrhoids.
Recent findings: Despite the large burden of hemorrhoidal diseases, research in this area, particularly on endoscopic approaches for treatment, has been slow. Within the last 5 years, data has been published on the novel cap-assisted endoscopic sclerotherapy (CAES), which will continue to gain attention in the future. Rubber band ligation has been adopted by the endoscopist as endoscopic rubber band ligation (ERBL), demonstrating satisfactory results in treating symptomatic hemorrhoids, although mild postprocedure complications are common. Data is needed on head-to-head comparisons between ERBL, endoscopic sclerotherapy, and CAES. Other methods, such as coagulation, are understudied and should be explored further in the endoscopic setting. Meaningful comparisons between treatment methods for internal hemorrhoids have been difficult because of variations in interventional techniques and methods, differences in the grading of hemorrhoids, and lack of standardization of clinical trials. The Goligher classification alone is inadequate for determining the management of symptomatic hemorrhoids and this warrants revision.
Summary: Gastroenterologists are poised to assume a greater role in the management of internal hemorrhoids with flexible endoscopy. Current endoscopic treatment options require further study.
期刊介绍:
Published bimonthly and offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field, each issue of Current Opinion in Gastroenterology features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With twelve disciplines published across the year – including gastrointestinal infections, nutrition and inflammatory bowel disease – every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.