用内窥镜治疗痔疮。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Current Opinion in Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-21 DOI:10.1097/MOG.0000000000000960
Syed Matthew Kodilinye, Anthony N Kalloo
{"title":"用内窥镜治疗痔疮。","authors":"Syed Matthew Kodilinye, Anthony N Kalloo","doi":"10.1097/MOG.0000000000000960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To review the literature within the last 5 years on the current status and future perspectives of the endoscopic management of internal hemorrhoids.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Despite the large burden of hemorrhoidal diseases, research in this area, particularly on endoscopic approaches for treatment, has been slow. Within the last 5 years, data has been published on the novel cap-assisted endoscopic sclerotherapy (CAES), which will continue to gain attention in the future. Rubber band ligation has been adopted by the endoscopist as endoscopic rubber band ligation (ERBL), demonstrating satisfactory results in treating symptomatic hemorrhoids, although mild postprocedure complications are common. Data is needed on head-to-head comparisons between ERBL, endoscopic sclerotherapy, and CAES. Other methods, such as coagulation, are understudied and should be explored further in the endoscopic setting. Meaningful comparisons between treatment methods for internal hemorrhoids have been difficult because of variations in interventional techniques and methods, differences in the grading of hemorrhoids, and lack of standardization of clinical trials. The Goligher classification alone is inadequate for determining the management of symptomatic hemorrhoids and this warrants revision.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Gastroenterologists are poised to assume a greater role in the management of internal hemorrhoids with flexible endoscopy. Current endoscopic treatment options require further study.</p>","PeriodicalId":50607,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Gastroenterology","volume":"39 5","pages":"375-380"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic approaches to the management of hemorrhoids.\",\"authors\":\"Syed Matthew Kodilinye, Anthony N Kalloo\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MOG.0000000000000960\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To review the literature within the last 5 years on the current status and future perspectives of the endoscopic management of internal hemorrhoids.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Despite the large burden of hemorrhoidal diseases, research in this area, particularly on endoscopic approaches for treatment, has been slow. Within the last 5 years, data has been published on the novel cap-assisted endoscopic sclerotherapy (CAES), which will continue to gain attention in the future. Rubber band ligation has been adopted by the endoscopist as endoscopic rubber band ligation (ERBL), demonstrating satisfactory results in treating symptomatic hemorrhoids, although mild postprocedure complications are common. Data is needed on head-to-head comparisons between ERBL, endoscopic sclerotherapy, and CAES. Other methods, such as coagulation, are understudied and should be explored further in the endoscopic setting. Meaningful comparisons between treatment methods for internal hemorrhoids have been difficult because of variations in interventional techniques and methods, differences in the grading of hemorrhoids, and lack of standardization of clinical trials. The Goligher classification alone is inadequate for determining the management of symptomatic hemorrhoids and this warrants revision.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Gastroenterologists are poised to assume a greater role in the management of internal hemorrhoids with flexible endoscopy. Current endoscopic treatment options require further study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"39 5\",\"pages\":\"375-380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOG.0000000000000960\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOG.0000000000000960","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:回顾过去 5 年有关内窥镜治疗内痔的现状和未来前景的文献:尽管痔疮疾病造成了巨大的负担,但该领域的研究,尤其是内窥镜治疗方法的研究却进展缓慢。在过去的 5 年中,有关新型帽辅助内窥镜硬化剂注射疗法(CAES)的数据已经公布,该疗法在未来将继续受到关注。橡皮圈结扎术已被内镜医师采用为内镜下橡皮圈结扎术(ERBL),在治疗无症状痔疮方面取得了令人满意的效果,但术后轻度并发症很常见。ERBL、内镜下硬化剂注射疗法和CAES之间需要进行正面比较。其他方法,如凝固法,还未得到充分研究,应在内窥镜环境中进一步探索。由于介入技术和方法的差异、痔疮分级的不同以及临床试验缺乏标准化,很难对内痔治疗方法进行有意义的比较。总结:消化内科医生将在利用柔性内窥镜治疗内痔方面发挥更大的作用。目前的内窥镜治疗方案需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Endoscopic approaches to the management of hemorrhoids.

Purpose of review: To review the literature within the last 5 years on the current status and future perspectives of the endoscopic management of internal hemorrhoids.

Recent findings: Despite the large burden of hemorrhoidal diseases, research in this area, particularly on endoscopic approaches for treatment, has been slow. Within the last 5 years, data has been published on the novel cap-assisted endoscopic sclerotherapy (CAES), which will continue to gain attention in the future. Rubber band ligation has been adopted by the endoscopist as endoscopic rubber band ligation (ERBL), demonstrating satisfactory results in treating symptomatic hemorrhoids, although mild postprocedure complications are common. Data is needed on head-to-head comparisons between ERBL, endoscopic sclerotherapy, and CAES. Other methods, such as coagulation, are understudied and should be explored further in the endoscopic setting. Meaningful comparisons between treatment methods for internal hemorrhoids have been difficult because of variations in interventional techniques and methods, differences in the grading of hemorrhoids, and lack of standardization of clinical trials. The Goligher classification alone is inadequate for determining the management of symptomatic hemorrhoids and this warrants revision.

Summary: Gastroenterologists are poised to assume a greater role in the management of internal hemorrhoids with flexible endoscopy. Current endoscopic treatment options require further study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Gastroenterology
Current Opinion in Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​Published bimonthly and offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field, each issue of Current Opinion in Gastroenterology features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With twelve disciplines published across the year – including gastrointestinal infections, nutrition and inflammatory bowel disease – every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
期刊最新文献
Updates on therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound. Tight junction regulation, intestinal permeability, and mucosal immunity in gastrointestinal health and disease. Endoscopic therapies for bariatric surgery complications. Gastroduodenal injury and repair mechanisms. Nutritional aspects in patients with gastroparesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1