对美国六个医疗系统解决癌症幸存者问题的政策和系统层面干预措施进行描述性研究。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Journal of Cancer Survivorship Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-06 DOI:10.1007/s11764-023-01440-y
Martha Quinn, Nathan Wright, Marylee Scherdt, Debra L Barton, Marita Titler, Julie S Armin, Michelle J Naughton, Jennifer Wenzel, Sanja Percac-Lima, Pooja Mishra, Sankirtana M Danner, Christopher R Friese
{"title":"对美国六个医疗系统解决癌症幸存者问题的政策和系统层面干预措施进行描述性研究。","authors":"Martha Quinn, Nathan Wright, Marylee Scherdt, Debra L Barton, Marita Titler, Julie S Armin, Michelle J Naughton, Jennifer Wenzel, Sanja Percac-Lima, Pooja Mishra, Sankirtana M Danner, Christopher R Friese","doi":"10.1007/s11764-023-01440-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe policy and system-level interventions with potential to improve cancer care at six sites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2016, six institutions received foundation support to develop unique multi-component interventions aimed at improving cancer care for underserved populations. These organizations, located across the United States, participated in a cross-site evaluation to assess the overall initiative impact and to identify potentially promising policy and system-level solutions for dissemination and broader implementation. A health system and policy tracking tool was developed to collect data from each site and included a description of their efforts, strategies employed, and changes achieved (e.g., new policies, clinical protocols). Tracking tool data were analyzed using rapid qualitative analyses and a matrix approach. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with site leaders (N = 65) and were analyzed by thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sites reported 20 system and policy efforts, which resulted in improvements to electronic health records and telehealth strategies, changes to hospital/health system policies, and standardized clinical protocols/guidelines, among others. Efforts were aimed at: (1) coordinating care across multiple providers, supported by patient navigators; (2) expanding psychosocial and supportive care; (3) improving patient-provider communication; and (4) addressing barriers to accessing care. Interview analyses provided insights into successful strategies, challenges, and implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications for cancer survivors: </strong>Despite advances in diagnosis and treatment, cancer care remains inequitable. System-level improvements aimed at eliminating common barriers faced by underserved populations offer opportunities to improve the delivery of equitable, effective, and efficient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":15284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","volume":" ","pages":"2022-2032"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A descriptive study of policy and system-level interventions to address cancer survivorship issues across six United States health systems.\",\"authors\":\"Martha Quinn, Nathan Wright, Marylee Scherdt, Debra L Barton, Marita Titler, Julie S Armin, Michelle J Naughton, Jennifer Wenzel, Sanja Percac-Lima, Pooja Mishra, Sankirtana M Danner, Christopher R Friese\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11764-023-01440-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe policy and system-level interventions with potential to improve cancer care at six sites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2016, six institutions received foundation support to develop unique multi-component interventions aimed at improving cancer care for underserved populations. These organizations, located across the United States, participated in a cross-site evaluation to assess the overall initiative impact and to identify potentially promising policy and system-level solutions for dissemination and broader implementation. A health system and policy tracking tool was developed to collect data from each site and included a description of their efforts, strategies employed, and changes achieved (e.g., new policies, clinical protocols). Tracking tool data were analyzed using rapid qualitative analyses and a matrix approach. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with site leaders (N = 65) and were analyzed by thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sites reported 20 system and policy efforts, which resulted in improvements to electronic health records and telehealth strategies, changes to hospital/health system policies, and standardized clinical protocols/guidelines, among others. Efforts were aimed at: (1) coordinating care across multiple providers, supported by patient navigators; (2) expanding psychosocial and supportive care; (3) improving patient-provider communication; and (4) addressing barriers to accessing care. Interview analyses provided insights into successful strategies, challenges, and implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications for cancer survivors: </strong>Despite advances in diagnosis and treatment, cancer care remains inequitable. System-level improvements aimed at eliminating common barriers faced by underserved populations offer opportunities to improve the delivery of equitable, effective, and efficient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Survivorship\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2022-2032\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Survivorship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-023-01440-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-023-01440-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:描述有可能在六个地点改善癌症护理的政策和系统级干预措施:2016 年,六家机构获得了基金会的支持,开发了独特的多成分干预措施,旨在改善服务不足人群的癌症护理。这些机构分布在美国各地,它们参与了一项跨地点评估,以评估该倡议的整体影响,并找出有潜力的政策和系统级解决方案,以便推广和更广泛地实施。我们开发了一个卫生系统和政策跟踪工具,以收集来自各站点的数据,其中包括对其所做努力、采用的策略和取得的变化(如新政策、临床协议)的描述。跟踪工具数据采用快速定性分析和矩阵方法进行分析。对医疗点负责人(N = 65)进行了半结构化访谈,并通过主题分析法对访谈结果进行了分析:研究机构报告了 20 项系统和政策工作,包括改进电子健康记录和远程医疗策略、修改医院/医疗系统政策以及标准化临床协议/指南等。这些努力旨在(1) 在患者导航员的支持下,协调多个医疗服务提供者之间的医疗服务;(2) 扩大社会心理和支持性医疗服务;(3) 改善患者与医疗服务提供者之间的沟通;以及 (4) 解决获得医疗服务的障碍。访谈分析深入揭示了成功的策略、挑战以及 COVID-19 大流行对癌症护理的影响:尽管在诊断和治疗方面取得了进步,但癌症护理仍然不公平。旨在消除医疗服务不足人群所面临的共同障碍的系统级改进措施为改善公平、有效和高效的医疗服务提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A descriptive study of policy and system-level interventions to address cancer survivorship issues across six United States health systems.

Purpose: To describe policy and system-level interventions with potential to improve cancer care at six sites.

Methods: In 2016, six institutions received foundation support to develop unique multi-component interventions aimed at improving cancer care for underserved populations. These organizations, located across the United States, participated in a cross-site evaluation to assess the overall initiative impact and to identify potentially promising policy and system-level solutions for dissemination and broader implementation. A health system and policy tracking tool was developed to collect data from each site and included a description of their efforts, strategies employed, and changes achieved (e.g., new policies, clinical protocols). Tracking tool data were analyzed using rapid qualitative analyses and a matrix approach. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with site leaders (N = 65) and were analyzed by thematic analysis.

Results: Sites reported 20 system and policy efforts, which resulted in improvements to electronic health records and telehealth strategies, changes to hospital/health system policies, and standardized clinical protocols/guidelines, among others. Efforts were aimed at: (1) coordinating care across multiple providers, supported by patient navigators; (2) expanding psychosocial and supportive care; (3) improving patient-provider communication; and (4) addressing barriers to accessing care. Interview analyses provided insights into successful strategies, challenges, and implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer care.

Conclusions and implications for cancer survivors: Despite advances in diagnosis and treatment, cancer care remains inequitable. System-level improvements aimed at eliminating common barriers faced by underserved populations offer opportunities to improve the delivery of equitable, effective, and efficient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
10.80%
发文量
149
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer survivorship is a worldwide concern. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to provide a global forum for new knowledge related to cancer survivorship. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers relevant to improving the understanding, prevention, and management of the multiple areas related to cancer survivorship that can affect quality of care, access to care, longevity, and quality of life. It is a forum for research on humans (both laboratory and clinical), clinical studies, systematic and meta-analytic literature reviews, policy studies, and in rare situations case studies as long as they provide a new observation that should be followed up on to improve outcomes related to cancer survivors. Published articles represent a broad range of fields including oncology, primary care, physical medicine and rehabilitation, many other medical and nursing specialties, nursing, health services research, physical and occupational therapy, public health, behavioral medicine, psychology, social work, evidence-based policy, health economics, biobehavioral mechanisms, and qualitative analyses. The journal focuses exclusively on adult cancer survivors, young adult cancer survivors, and childhood cancer survivors who are young adults. Submissions must target those diagnosed with and treated for cancer.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Psychological and physical function in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant survivors with chronic graft-versus-host disease. Fear of cancer recurrence and its predictors among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Sexual satisfaction in prostate cancer: a multi-group comparison study of treated patients, patients under active surveillance, patients with negative biopsy, and controls. Quality of life assessment in testicular non-seminomatous germ cell tumour survivors. State of research, feasibility, safety, acceptability, and outcomes examined on remotely delivered exercises using technology for older adult with cancer: a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1