Anne Kamphausen, Natalia Tarasova, Abigail Bardwell, Torrey A Laack, Larissa T Shiue, Tobias Kummer
{"title":"磁场诱导下的针定位是否能提高新手的中心静脉导管插入术操作水平?","authors":"Anne Kamphausen, Natalia Tarasova, Abigail Bardwell, Torrey A Laack, Larissa T Shiue, Tobias Kummer","doi":"10.1177/11297298231191374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The novel ultrasound magnetic needle navigation technique can visualize the entire needle and identify its projected trajectory. We hypothesized that this technique increases the first-attempt success rate of central venous puncture by novice learners compared with the conventional needle navigation technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized, controlled trial with a crossover design included 50 participants with limited prior experience in US-guided procedures. Participants were randomly assigned to novel or conventional technique groups and asked to perform central venous cannulation in a phantom task trainer. After the first successful attempt, participants were allocated to the other technique group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although participants in the novel technique group had a higher first-attempt success rate than did those in the conventional technique group, this difference was not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.17). The total number of attempts also did not significantly differ (<i>p</i> = 0.16). The conventional technique group had more needle redirections (<i>p</i> = 0.01) and a longer time to successful cannulation (<i>p</i> = 0.01). The number of adverse effects (<i>p</i> = 0.32) did not differ between groups. Participant confidence levels were higher in the novel technique group (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Magnetic needle navigation can reduce the number of needle redirections, shorten the time to successful cannulation, and increase confidence levels by novice learners for successful US-guided central venous access.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"1877-1884"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does needle positioning with magnetic field induction improve central venous catheterization performance by novice learners?\",\"authors\":\"Anne Kamphausen, Natalia Tarasova, Abigail Bardwell, Torrey A Laack, Larissa T Shiue, Tobias Kummer\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11297298231191374\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The novel ultrasound magnetic needle navigation technique can visualize the entire needle and identify its projected trajectory. We hypothesized that this technique increases the first-attempt success rate of central venous puncture by novice learners compared with the conventional needle navigation technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized, controlled trial with a crossover design included 50 participants with limited prior experience in US-guided procedures. Participants were randomly assigned to novel or conventional technique groups and asked to perform central venous cannulation in a phantom task trainer. After the first successful attempt, participants were allocated to the other technique group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although participants in the novel technique group had a higher first-attempt success rate than did those in the conventional technique group, this difference was not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.17). The total number of attempts also did not significantly differ (<i>p</i> = 0.16). The conventional technique group had more needle redirections (<i>p</i> = 0.01) and a longer time to successful cannulation (<i>p</i> = 0.01). The number of adverse effects (<i>p</i> = 0.32) did not differ between groups. Participant confidence levels were higher in the novel technique group (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Magnetic needle navigation can reduce the number of needle redirections, shorten the time to successful cannulation, and increase confidence levels by novice learners for successful US-guided central venous access.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1877-1884\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298231191374\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298231191374","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:新型超声磁针导航技术可显示整个穿刺针并识别其投影轨迹。我们假设,与传统的磁针导航技术相比,该技术能提高新手首次尝试中心静脉穿刺的成功率:这项采用交叉设计的前瞻性随机对照试验包括 50 名在 US 引导手术方面经验有限的参与者。参与者被随机分配到新技术组和传统技术组,并被要求在模拟任务训练器中进行中心静脉插管。首次尝试成功后,参与者被分配到另一技术组:结果:虽然新技术组参与者的首次尝试成功率高于传统技术组,但这一差异并无统计学意义(P = 0.17)。尝试的总次数也没有显著差异(p = 0.16)。传统技术组的针头重定向次数更多(p = 0.01),成功插管的时间更长(p = 0.01)。不良反应的数量(p = 0.32)在各组之间没有差异。新技术组的参与者信心水平更高(p 结论:磁针导航可减少插管次数:磁针导航可减少针头重定向的次数,缩短成功插管的时间,并提高新手学习者对成功进行 US 引导中心静脉通路的信心水平。
Does needle positioning with magnetic field induction improve central venous catheterization performance by novice learners?
Objective: The novel ultrasound magnetic needle navigation technique can visualize the entire needle and identify its projected trajectory. We hypothesized that this technique increases the first-attempt success rate of central venous puncture by novice learners compared with the conventional needle navigation technique.
Methods: This prospective, randomized, controlled trial with a crossover design included 50 participants with limited prior experience in US-guided procedures. Participants were randomly assigned to novel or conventional technique groups and asked to perform central venous cannulation in a phantom task trainer. After the first successful attempt, participants were allocated to the other technique group.
Results: Although participants in the novel technique group had a higher first-attempt success rate than did those in the conventional technique group, this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.17). The total number of attempts also did not significantly differ (p = 0.16). The conventional technique group had more needle redirections (p = 0.01) and a longer time to successful cannulation (p = 0.01). The number of adverse effects (p = 0.32) did not differ between groups. Participant confidence levels were higher in the novel technique group (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Magnetic needle navigation can reduce the number of needle redirections, shorten the time to successful cannulation, and increase confidence levels by novice learners for successful US-guided central venous access.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques.
All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process.
The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level:
• Dialysis
• Oncology
• Interventional radiology
• Nutrition
• Nursing
• Intensive care
Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.