COVID-19 对意大利医药机构决策过程的影响:定量评估。

IF 0.4 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment Pub Date : 2023-05-31 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.33393/grhta.2023.2560
Beatrice Canali, Laura Candelora, Francesca Fiorentino, Tom Halmos, Paola La Malfa, Francesca Massara, Chiara Vassallo, Duccio Urbinati
{"title":"COVID-19 对意大利医药机构决策过程的影响:定量评估。","authors":"Beatrice Canali, Laura Candelora, Francesca Fiorentino, Tom Halmos, Paola La Malfa, Francesca Massara, Chiara Vassallo, Duccio Urbinati","doi":"10.33393/grhta.2023.2560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since the COVID-19 pandemic has placed more attention on drugs' approval process and the importance of rapid decision-making in the healthcare sector, it is crucial to assess how time to market (TTM) of drugs varied.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on TTM of drugs in Italy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An IQVIA database was used to retrieve information on drugs that obtained positive opinion from the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use between January 2015 and December 2021. The available observations were divided into three groups (Pre COVID, Partially COVID, and Fully COVID) according to the timing of their negotiation process. Differences in average TTM among the three groups were analyzed in three steps: (1) descriptive statistics; (2) univariate analysis; (3) multivariate analysis, using a matching estimator.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 363 unique combinations of molecule and indication met the inclusion criteria: 174 in the Pre COVID group, 69 in the Partially COVID group, and 123 in the Fully COVID group. Descriptive statistics and univariate analysis found a statistically significant difference in TTM among the three periods, with average TTM increasing during the pandemic (+136 days, p = 0.00) and then decreasing afterward (-23 days, p = 0.09). In the matching analysis, results for the Partially COVID period were confirmed (+108 days, p = 0.00) while results for the Fully COVID period lost significance but maintained a negative sign.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggest that after an adjustment phase in the Partially COVID period, a return to the <i>status quo</i> was reached.</p>","PeriodicalId":12627,"journal":{"name":"Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0c/76/grhta-10-46.PMC10238912.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 impact on the decision process of the Italian Medicine Agency: a quantitative assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Beatrice Canali, Laura Candelora, Francesca Fiorentino, Tom Halmos, Paola La Malfa, Francesca Massara, Chiara Vassallo, Duccio Urbinati\",\"doi\":\"10.33393/grhta.2023.2560\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since the COVID-19 pandemic has placed more attention on drugs' approval process and the importance of rapid decision-making in the healthcare sector, it is crucial to assess how time to market (TTM) of drugs varied.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on TTM of drugs in Italy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An IQVIA database was used to retrieve information on drugs that obtained positive opinion from the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use between January 2015 and December 2021. The available observations were divided into three groups (Pre COVID, Partially COVID, and Fully COVID) according to the timing of their negotiation process. Differences in average TTM among the three groups were analyzed in three steps: (1) descriptive statistics; (2) univariate analysis; (3) multivariate analysis, using a matching estimator.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 363 unique combinations of molecule and indication met the inclusion criteria: 174 in the Pre COVID group, 69 in the Partially COVID group, and 123 in the Fully COVID group. Descriptive statistics and univariate analysis found a statistically significant difference in TTM among the three periods, with average TTM increasing during the pandemic (+136 days, p = 0.00) and then decreasing afterward (-23 days, p = 0.09). In the matching analysis, results for the Partially COVID period were confirmed (+108 days, p = 0.00) while results for the Fully COVID period lost significance but maintained a negative sign.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggest that after an adjustment phase in the Partially COVID period, a return to the <i>status quo</i> was reached.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0c/76/grhta-10-46.PMC10238912.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33393/grhta.2023.2560\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33393/grhta.2023.2560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于 COVID-19 大流行使人们更加关注药品的审批程序以及医疗保健领域快速决策的重要性,因此评估药品上市时间(TTM)的变化情况至关重要:估计 COVID-19 大流行对意大利药品上市时间的影响:方法:使用 IQVIA 数据库检索 2015 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间获得人用医药产品委员会肯定意见的药物信息。根据谈判进程的时间,将现有观察结果分为三组(COVID 前、部分 COVID 和完全 COVID)。我们分三个步骤分析了三组之间平均 TTM 的差异:(1) 描述性统计;(2) 单变量分析;(3) 使用匹配估计器进行多变量分析:共有 363 个独特的分子和适应症组合符合纳入标准:COVID 前组有 174 个,COVID 部分组有 69 个,COVID 完全组有 123 个。描述性统计和单变量分析发现,三个时期的 TTM 有显著的统计学差异,平均 TTM 在大流行期间增加(+136 天,p = 0.00),之后减少(-23 天,p = 0.09)。在匹配分析中,部分 COVID 期间的结果得到了证实(+108 天,p = 0.00),而完全 COVID 期间的结果失去了显著性,但保持了负号:结果表明,在部分 COVID 期经过调整阶段后,又恢复了原状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 impact on the decision process of the Italian Medicine Agency: a quantitative assessment.

Background: Since the COVID-19 pandemic has placed more attention on drugs' approval process and the importance of rapid decision-making in the healthcare sector, it is crucial to assess how time to market (TTM) of drugs varied.

Objective: To estimate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on TTM of drugs in Italy.

Methods: An IQVIA database was used to retrieve information on drugs that obtained positive opinion from the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use between January 2015 and December 2021. The available observations were divided into three groups (Pre COVID, Partially COVID, and Fully COVID) according to the timing of their negotiation process. Differences in average TTM among the three groups were analyzed in three steps: (1) descriptive statistics; (2) univariate analysis; (3) multivariate analysis, using a matching estimator.

Results: A total of 363 unique combinations of molecule and indication met the inclusion criteria: 174 in the Pre COVID group, 69 in the Partially COVID group, and 123 in the Fully COVID group. Descriptive statistics and univariate analysis found a statistically significant difference in TTM among the three periods, with average TTM increasing during the pandemic (+136 days, p = 0.00) and then decreasing afterward (-23 days, p = 0.09). In the matching analysis, results for the Partially COVID period were confirmed (+108 days, p = 0.00) while results for the Fully COVID period lost significance but maintained a negative sign.

Conclusions: The results suggest that after an adjustment phase in the Partially COVID period, a return to the status quo was reached.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment
Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment (GRHTA) is a peer-reviewed, open access journal which aims to promote health technology assessment and economic evaluation, enabling choices among alternative therapeutical paths or procedures with different clinical and economic outcomes. GRHTA is a unique journal having three different editorial boards who focus on their respective geographical expertise.
期刊最新文献
Il burden economico e sociale della porpora trombotica trombocitopenica congenita (cTTP) in Italia. Drug utilization and medication adherence for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: an Italian study. Analisi di impatto sul budget sanitario italiano di roxadustat per il trattamento dell’anemia da malattia renale cronica. Place in therapy of dalbavancin to treat Gram-positive infections in antimicrobial resistance era: an overview. The efficacy of dalbavancin and impact on hospitalization and treatment costs in patients with ABSSSI.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1