{"title":"愿意使用新的可逆男性节育方法:一项基于社区的美国顺性男性调查。","authors":"Summer L Martins, Christy M Boraas","doi":"10.1186/s40834-023-00242-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is high global demand for new methods of male birth control (MBC). However, contemporary evidence regarding men's method-specific attitudes and their determinants is sparse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Non-sterilized cisgender men ages 18-45 with recent history of female sex partners were surveyed at a large community event in the Midwestern US. We examined variation in participants' willingness to use MBC by method (gel, pill, injection, implant, and vas occlusion), potential side effects, and potential barriers. We estimated crude and adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) for associations between participant characteristics and willingness to use ≥ 1 MBC method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 72% of participants (n = 187; mean age, 29) were very willing to use ≥ 1 MBC method although support for individual methods ranged widely from 62% (pill) to 24% (vas occlusion). In bivariate analysis of sociodemographic and health characteristics, few demonstrated associations with MBC willingness. In a multivariable model, willingness was independently related to age (30-39 vs. 18-29 years old, aPR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.04-1.48) and having ever been tested for HIV (aPR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.07-1.51). Willingness to tolerate side effects was < 10% for most items. The most commonly endorsed barriers to MBC use were high cost (77%) and side effects (66%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Enthusiasm for MBC was high but waned in the context of potential side effects and barriers. Additional research on MBC attitudes in socioeconomically and culturally diverse populations worldwide is sorely needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10637,"journal":{"name":"Contraception and Reproductive Medicine","volume":"8 1","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10413635/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Willingness to use novel reversible methods of male birth control: a community-based survey of cisgender men in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Summer L Martins, Christy M Boraas\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40834-023-00242-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is high global demand for new methods of male birth control (MBC). However, contemporary evidence regarding men's method-specific attitudes and their determinants is sparse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Non-sterilized cisgender men ages 18-45 with recent history of female sex partners were surveyed at a large community event in the Midwestern US. We examined variation in participants' willingness to use MBC by method (gel, pill, injection, implant, and vas occlusion), potential side effects, and potential barriers. We estimated crude and adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) for associations between participant characteristics and willingness to use ≥ 1 MBC method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 72% of participants (n = 187; mean age, 29) were very willing to use ≥ 1 MBC method although support for individual methods ranged widely from 62% (pill) to 24% (vas occlusion). In bivariate analysis of sociodemographic and health characteristics, few demonstrated associations with MBC willingness. In a multivariable model, willingness was independently related to age (30-39 vs. 18-29 years old, aPR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.04-1.48) and having ever been tested for HIV (aPR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.07-1.51). Willingness to tolerate side effects was < 10% for most items. The most commonly endorsed barriers to MBC use were high cost (77%) and side effects (66%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Enthusiasm for MBC was high but waned in the context of potential side effects and barriers. Additional research on MBC attitudes in socioeconomically and culturally diverse populations worldwide is sorely needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception and Reproductive Medicine\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10413635/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception and Reproductive Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-023-00242-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception and Reproductive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-023-00242-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:全球对新型男性节育方法(MBC)的需求很大。然而,关于男性对特定方法的态度及其决定因素的当代证据很少。方法:在美国中西部的一个大型社区活动中,对年龄在18-45岁、近期有女性性伴侣史的未绝育的顺性男性进行调查。我们检查了不同方法(凝胶、丸剂、注射、植入和输精管阻塞)、潜在副作用和潜在障碍的参与者使用MBC的意愿差异。我们估计了参与者特征和使用≥1 MBC方法意愿之间的粗患病率和调整患病率(aPRs)。结果:总体而言,72%的参与者(n = 187;平均年龄29岁)非常愿意使用≥1 MBC方法,尽管个别方法的支持度从62%(避孕药)到24%(输精管阻塞)不等。在社会人口统计学和健康特征的双变量分析中,很少显示与MBC意愿相关。在多变量模型中,自愿与年龄(30-39岁vs. 18-29岁,aPR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.04-1.48)和是否接受过HIV检测(aPR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.07-1.51)独立相关。结论:对MBC的热情很高,但在潜在的副作用和障碍的背景下减弱。迫切需要对世界各地社会经济和文化多样化人口的MBC态度进行进一步研究。
Willingness to use novel reversible methods of male birth control: a community-based survey of cisgender men in the United States.
Background: There is high global demand for new methods of male birth control (MBC). However, contemporary evidence regarding men's method-specific attitudes and their determinants is sparse.
Methods: Non-sterilized cisgender men ages 18-45 with recent history of female sex partners were surveyed at a large community event in the Midwestern US. We examined variation in participants' willingness to use MBC by method (gel, pill, injection, implant, and vas occlusion), potential side effects, and potential barriers. We estimated crude and adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) for associations between participant characteristics and willingness to use ≥ 1 MBC method.
Results: Overall, 72% of participants (n = 187; mean age, 29) were very willing to use ≥ 1 MBC method although support for individual methods ranged widely from 62% (pill) to 24% (vas occlusion). In bivariate analysis of sociodemographic and health characteristics, few demonstrated associations with MBC willingness. In a multivariable model, willingness was independently related to age (30-39 vs. 18-29 years old, aPR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.04-1.48) and having ever been tested for HIV (aPR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.07-1.51). Willingness to tolerate side effects was < 10% for most items. The most commonly endorsed barriers to MBC use were high cost (77%) and side effects (66%).
Conclusions: Enthusiasm for MBC was high but waned in the context of potential side effects and barriers. Additional research on MBC attitudes in socioeconomically and culturally diverse populations worldwide is sorely needed.