Joris R Delanghe, Evelyn Verlinde, Marijn M Speeckaert, Thomas Maenhout
{"title":"基于糖化血红蛋白的HOMA-IR和HOMA-IR估计可替代空腹血糖。","authors":"Joris R Delanghe, Evelyn Verlinde, Marijn M Speeckaert, Thomas Maenhout","doi":"10.1080/17843286.2022.2160889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetes mellitus is a major global public health problem. Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) is a key laboratory index in the assessment of insulin resistance. The calculation of HOMA-IR and its updated version HOMA2-IR are partly based on plasma glucose determinations, which are prone to important pre-analytical errors. As glycated hemoglobin (Hb) fractions strongly correlate with fasting glucose levels and are more stable analytes, we explored the possibilities of using glycated Hb fractions for calculating HOMA-IR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Labile Hb and HbA<sub>1c</sub> fractions were simultaneously assayed on a Tosoh G8 analyzer and expressed as %. Fasting glucose was measured in fluoride plasma using a hexokinase method. A Lumipulse G1200 luminescence immunoassay was used to measure serum insulin. The HOMA-IR and HOMA2-IR values were compared to corresponding indices calculated using glucose and glycated Hb fractions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Labile Hb could be measured with between-run CVs of 2.2-2.3%. Labile Hb correlated with both glycemia (r = 0.80) and HbA<sub>1c</sub> results (r = 0.73). HbA1c-derived estimated average glucose (eAG)-based HOMA calculation correlated very well with HOMA-IR (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.9972). Based on eAG calculations, HOMA2-IR (%B, %S, and IR) gave comparable results, as compared to labile Hb-based calculations, in particular for fasting plasma glucose values between 4.44 and 6.67 mmol/L.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HbA1c and eAG are practical alternatives for glucose for estimating HOMA-IR. The use of glycated Hb enables home sampling for HOMA-IR and HOMA2-IR calculation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7086,"journal":{"name":"Acta Clinica Belgica","volume":"78 4","pages":"308-312"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HOMA-IR and HOMA2-IR estimation based on glycated hemoglobin as an alternative for fasting glucose.\",\"authors\":\"Joris R Delanghe, Evelyn Verlinde, Marijn M Speeckaert, Thomas Maenhout\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17843286.2022.2160889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetes mellitus is a major global public health problem. Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) is a key laboratory index in the assessment of insulin resistance. The calculation of HOMA-IR and its updated version HOMA2-IR are partly based on plasma glucose determinations, which are prone to important pre-analytical errors. As glycated hemoglobin (Hb) fractions strongly correlate with fasting glucose levels and are more stable analytes, we explored the possibilities of using glycated Hb fractions for calculating HOMA-IR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Labile Hb and HbA<sub>1c</sub> fractions were simultaneously assayed on a Tosoh G8 analyzer and expressed as %. Fasting glucose was measured in fluoride plasma using a hexokinase method. A Lumipulse G1200 luminescence immunoassay was used to measure serum insulin. The HOMA-IR and HOMA2-IR values were compared to corresponding indices calculated using glucose and glycated Hb fractions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Labile Hb could be measured with between-run CVs of 2.2-2.3%. Labile Hb correlated with both glycemia (r = 0.80) and HbA<sub>1c</sub> results (r = 0.73). HbA1c-derived estimated average glucose (eAG)-based HOMA calculation correlated very well with HOMA-IR (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.9972). Based on eAG calculations, HOMA2-IR (%B, %S, and IR) gave comparable results, as compared to labile Hb-based calculations, in particular for fasting plasma glucose values between 4.44 and 6.67 mmol/L.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HbA1c and eAG are practical alternatives for glucose for estimating HOMA-IR. The use of glycated Hb enables home sampling for HOMA-IR and HOMA2-IR calculation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Clinica Belgica\",\"volume\":\"78 4\",\"pages\":\"308-312\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Clinica Belgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17843286.2022.2160889\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Clinica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17843286.2022.2160889","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
HOMA-IR and HOMA2-IR estimation based on glycated hemoglobin as an alternative for fasting glucose.
Background: Diabetes mellitus is a major global public health problem. Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) is a key laboratory index in the assessment of insulin resistance. The calculation of HOMA-IR and its updated version HOMA2-IR are partly based on plasma glucose determinations, which are prone to important pre-analytical errors. As glycated hemoglobin (Hb) fractions strongly correlate with fasting glucose levels and are more stable analytes, we explored the possibilities of using glycated Hb fractions for calculating HOMA-IR.
Methods: Labile Hb and HbA1c fractions were simultaneously assayed on a Tosoh G8 analyzer and expressed as %. Fasting glucose was measured in fluoride plasma using a hexokinase method. A Lumipulse G1200 luminescence immunoassay was used to measure serum insulin. The HOMA-IR and HOMA2-IR values were compared to corresponding indices calculated using glucose and glycated Hb fractions.
Results: Labile Hb could be measured with between-run CVs of 2.2-2.3%. Labile Hb correlated with both glycemia (r = 0.80) and HbA1c results (r = 0.73). HbA1c-derived estimated average glucose (eAG)-based HOMA calculation correlated very well with HOMA-IR (r2 = 0.9972). Based on eAG calculations, HOMA2-IR (%B, %S, and IR) gave comparable results, as compared to labile Hb-based calculations, in particular for fasting plasma glucose values between 4.44 and 6.67 mmol/L.
Conclusions: HbA1c and eAG are practical alternatives for glucose for estimating HOMA-IR. The use of glycated Hb enables home sampling for HOMA-IR and HOMA2-IR calculation.
期刊介绍:
Acta Clinica Belgica: International Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Medicine primarily publishes papers on clinical medicine, clinical chemistry, pathology and molecular biology, provided they describe results which contribute to our understanding of clinical problems or describe new methods applicable to clinical investigation. Readership includes physicians, pathologists, pharmacists and physicians working in non-academic and academic hospitals, practicing internal medicine and its subspecialties.