肥胖成年人对运动和饮食干预的食欲和代谢反应。

IF 1.1 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-14 DOI:10.1249/tjx.0000000000000211
Sarah A Purcell, Kristina T Legget, Tanya M Halliday, Zhaoxing Pan, Seth A Creasy, Jennifer M Blankenship, Allison Hild, Jason R Tregellas, Edward L Melanson, Marc-Andre Cornier
{"title":"肥胖成年人对运动和饮食干预的食欲和代谢反应。","authors":"Sarah A Purcell, Kristina T Legget, Tanya M Halliday, Zhaoxing Pan, Seth A Creasy, Jennifer M Blankenship, Allison Hild, Jason R Tregellas, Edward L Melanson, Marc-Andre Cornier","doi":"10.1249/tjx.0000000000000211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/purpose: </strong>Dietary restriction (DIET) and aerobic exercise (AEX) interventions may impact energy balance differently. Our aim was to describe the effects of weight loss interventions via DIET or AEX on measures of energy balance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with overweight or obesity were randomized to 12 weeks of DIET or AEX with similar calorie deficit goals. A study day was conducted before and after the intervention to assess subjective and hormonal (ghrelin, peptide-YY, glucagon-like peptide-1) appetite responses to a control meal, <i>ad libitum</i> energy intake (EI) at a single meal, and over three days of free-living conditions and eating behavior traits. Resting metabolic rate (RMR) was measured with indirect calorimetry and adjusted for body composition measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry. Non-exercise activity was measured using accelerometers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-four individuals were included (age: 37 ± 9 years, body mass index: 30.6 ± 3.1 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). Both interventions resulted in weight and fat mass loss. The DIET group lost fat-free mass, although differences between groups were not significant (DIET: -1.2 ± 1.7 kg, p<0.001; AEX: 0.4 ± 1.5 kg, p=0.186; p=0.095 interaction). There were no differences in RMR after body composition adjustment. Both interventions were associated with an increase in dietary restraint (DIET: 4.9 ± 1.2, AEX: 2.8 ± 0.7; p<0.001 in both groups). Hunger decreased with DIET (-1.4 ± 0.5, p=0.003), and disinhibition decreased with AEX (-1.5 ± 0.5, p<0.001), although these changes were not different between groups (i.e., no group × time interaction). No other differences in appetite, EI, or non-exercise physical activity were observed within or between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AEX did not result in compensatory alterations in appetite, <i>ad libitum</i> EI, or physical activity, despite assumed increased energy expenditure. Modest evidence also suggested that disinhibition and hunger may be differentially impacted by weight loss modality.</p>","PeriodicalId":75243,"journal":{"name":"Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine","volume":"7 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635267/pdf/nihms-1817526.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Appetitive and Metabolic Responses to an Exercise versus Dietary Intervention in Adults with Obesity.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah A Purcell, Kristina T Legget, Tanya M Halliday, Zhaoxing Pan, Seth A Creasy, Jennifer M Blankenship, Allison Hild, Jason R Tregellas, Edward L Melanson, Marc-Andre Cornier\",\"doi\":\"10.1249/tjx.0000000000000211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction/purpose: </strong>Dietary restriction (DIET) and aerobic exercise (AEX) interventions may impact energy balance differently. Our aim was to describe the effects of weight loss interventions via DIET or AEX on measures of energy balance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with overweight or obesity were randomized to 12 weeks of DIET or AEX with similar calorie deficit goals. A study day was conducted before and after the intervention to assess subjective and hormonal (ghrelin, peptide-YY, glucagon-like peptide-1) appetite responses to a control meal, <i>ad libitum</i> energy intake (EI) at a single meal, and over three days of free-living conditions and eating behavior traits. Resting metabolic rate (RMR) was measured with indirect calorimetry and adjusted for body composition measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry. Non-exercise activity was measured using accelerometers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-four individuals were included (age: 37 ± 9 years, body mass index: 30.6 ± 3.1 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). Both interventions resulted in weight and fat mass loss. The DIET group lost fat-free mass, although differences between groups were not significant (DIET: -1.2 ± 1.7 kg, p<0.001; AEX: 0.4 ± 1.5 kg, p=0.186; p=0.095 interaction). There were no differences in RMR after body composition adjustment. Both interventions were associated with an increase in dietary restraint (DIET: 4.9 ± 1.2, AEX: 2.8 ± 0.7; p<0.001 in both groups). Hunger decreased with DIET (-1.4 ± 0.5, p=0.003), and disinhibition decreased with AEX (-1.5 ± 0.5, p<0.001), although these changes were not different between groups (i.e., no group × time interaction). No other differences in appetite, EI, or non-exercise physical activity were observed within or between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AEX did not result in compensatory alterations in appetite, <i>ad libitum</i> EI, or physical activity, despite assumed increased energy expenditure. Modest evidence also suggested that disinhibition and hunger may be differentially impacted by weight loss modality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635267/pdf/nihms-1817526.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1249/tjx.0000000000000211\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/10/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/tjx.0000000000000211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介/目的:饮食限制(DIET)和有氧运动(AEX)干预可能会对能量平衡产生不同的影响。我们的目的是描述通过DIET或AEX进行减肥干预对能量平衡测量的影响。方法:将超重或肥胖的成年人随机分为12周的DIET或AEX,其热量缺乏目标相似。在干预前后进行了一天的研究,以评估对对照餐的主观和激素(胃饥饿素、肽YY、胰高血糖素样肽-1)食欲反应、单餐随意能量摄入(EI)以及三天以上的自由生活条件和饮食行为特征。静息代谢率(RMR)用间接量热法测量,并根据双X射线吸收法测量的身体成分进行调整。使用加速度计测量非运动活动。结果:包括44名个体(年龄:37±9岁,体重指数:30.6±3.1 kg/m2)。这两种干预措施都能减轻体重和脂肪量。饮食组减少了无脂肪质量,尽管各组之间的差异并不显著(饮食:-1.2±1.7 kg,P结论:尽管假设能量消耗增加,但AEX并没有导致食欲、随意EI或体力活动的代偿性改变。适度的证据也表明,去抑制和饥饿可能会受到减肥方式的不同影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Appetitive and Metabolic Responses to an Exercise versus Dietary Intervention in Adults with Obesity.

Introduction/purpose: Dietary restriction (DIET) and aerobic exercise (AEX) interventions may impact energy balance differently. Our aim was to describe the effects of weight loss interventions via DIET or AEX on measures of energy balance.

Methods: Adults with overweight or obesity were randomized to 12 weeks of DIET or AEX with similar calorie deficit goals. A study day was conducted before and after the intervention to assess subjective and hormonal (ghrelin, peptide-YY, glucagon-like peptide-1) appetite responses to a control meal, ad libitum energy intake (EI) at a single meal, and over three days of free-living conditions and eating behavior traits. Resting metabolic rate (RMR) was measured with indirect calorimetry and adjusted for body composition measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry. Non-exercise activity was measured using accelerometers.

Results: Forty-four individuals were included (age: 37 ± 9 years, body mass index: 30.6 ± 3.1 kg/m2). Both interventions resulted in weight and fat mass loss. The DIET group lost fat-free mass, although differences between groups were not significant (DIET: -1.2 ± 1.7 kg, p<0.001; AEX: 0.4 ± 1.5 kg, p=0.186; p=0.095 interaction). There were no differences in RMR after body composition adjustment. Both interventions were associated with an increase in dietary restraint (DIET: 4.9 ± 1.2, AEX: 2.8 ± 0.7; p<0.001 in both groups). Hunger decreased with DIET (-1.4 ± 0.5, p=0.003), and disinhibition decreased with AEX (-1.5 ± 0.5, p<0.001), although these changes were not different between groups (i.e., no group × time interaction). No other differences in appetite, EI, or non-exercise physical activity were observed within or between groups.

Conclusions: AEX did not result in compensatory alterations in appetite, ad libitum EI, or physical activity, despite assumed increased energy expenditure. Modest evidence also suggested that disinhibition and hunger may be differentially impacted by weight loss modality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lifestyle strategies after intentional weight loss: results from the MAINTAIN-pc randomized trial. Associations of physical and social workplace characteristics with movement behaviors at work. Demographic, Clinical, and Psychosocial Predictors of Exercise Adherence: The STRRIDE Trials. Framework to Classify Physical Activity Intervention Studies for Older Adults Translational Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine: 2022 Paper of the Year
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1