多模态外周电生理技术在脊髓性肌萎缩患者队列中的可行性和耐受性

IF 2 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Clinical Neurophysiology Practice Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cnp.2023.06.001
Leandra A.A. Ros, Boudewijn T.H.M. Sleutjes, Diederik J.L. Stikvoort García, H. Stephan Goedee, Fay-Lynn Asselman, Leonard H. van den Berg, W. Ludo van der Pol , Renske I. Wadman
{"title":"多模态外周电生理技术在脊髓性肌萎缩患者队列中的可行性和耐受性","authors":"Leandra A.A. Ros,&nbsp;Boudewijn T.H.M. Sleutjes,&nbsp;Diederik J.L. Stikvoort García,&nbsp;H. Stephan Goedee,&nbsp;Fay-Lynn Asselman,&nbsp;Leonard H. van den Berg,&nbsp;W. Ludo van der Pol ,&nbsp;Renske I. Wadman","doi":"10.1016/j.cnp.2023.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Electrophysiological techniques are emerging as an aid in identifying prognostic or therapeutic biomarkers in patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), but electrophysiological assessments may be burdensome for patients. We, therefore, assessed feasibility and tolerability of multimodal peripheral non-invasive electrophysiological techniques in a cohort of patients with SMA.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a single center, longitudinal cohort study investigating the feasibility and tolerability of applying multimodal electrophysiological techniques to the median nerve unilaterally. Techniques consisted of the compound muscle action potential scan, motor nerve excitability tests, repetitive nerve stimulation and sensory nerve action potential. We assessed tolerability using the numeric rating scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), and defined the protocol to be tolerable if the NRS score ≤ 3. The protocol was considered feasible if it could be performed according to test and quality standards.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 71 patients with SMA types 1–4 (median 39 years; range 13–67) and 63 patients at follow-up. The protocol was feasible in 98% of patients and was well-tolerated in up to 90% of patients. Median NRS score was 2 (range 0–6 at baseline and range 0–4 at follow-up (p &lt; 0.01)). None of the patients declined follow-up assessment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Multimodal, peripheral, non-invasive, electrophysiological techniques applied to the median nerve are feasible and well-tolerated in adolescents and adults with SMA types 1–4.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>Our study supports the use of non-invasive multimodal electrophysiological assessments in adolescents and adults with SMA types 1–4.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45697,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice","volume":"8 ","pages":"Pages 123-131"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f4/cc/main.PMC10404501.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility and tolerability of multimodal peripheral electrophysiological techniques in a cohort of patients with spinal muscular atrophy\",\"authors\":\"Leandra A.A. Ros,&nbsp;Boudewijn T.H.M. Sleutjes,&nbsp;Diederik J.L. Stikvoort García,&nbsp;H. Stephan Goedee,&nbsp;Fay-Lynn Asselman,&nbsp;Leonard H. van den Berg,&nbsp;W. Ludo van der Pol ,&nbsp;Renske I. Wadman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cnp.2023.06.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Electrophysiological techniques are emerging as an aid in identifying prognostic or therapeutic biomarkers in patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), but electrophysiological assessments may be burdensome for patients. We, therefore, assessed feasibility and tolerability of multimodal peripheral non-invasive electrophysiological techniques in a cohort of patients with SMA.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a single center, longitudinal cohort study investigating the feasibility and tolerability of applying multimodal electrophysiological techniques to the median nerve unilaterally. Techniques consisted of the compound muscle action potential scan, motor nerve excitability tests, repetitive nerve stimulation and sensory nerve action potential. We assessed tolerability using the numeric rating scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), and defined the protocol to be tolerable if the NRS score ≤ 3. The protocol was considered feasible if it could be performed according to test and quality standards.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 71 patients with SMA types 1–4 (median 39 years; range 13–67) and 63 patients at follow-up. The protocol was feasible in 98% of patients and was well-tolerated in up to 90% of patients. Median NRS score was 2 (range 0–6 at baseline and range 0–4 at follow-up (p &lt; 0.01)). None of the patients declined follow-up assessment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Multimodal, peripheral, non-invasive, electrophysiological techniques applied to the median nerve are feasible and well-tolerated in adolescents and adults with SMA types 1–4.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>Our study supports the use of non-invasive multimodal electrophysiological assessments in adolescents and adults with SMA types 1–4.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 123-131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f4/cc/main.PMC10404501.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467981X23000161\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467981X23000161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的电生理技术正在成为确定脊髓性肌萎缩(SMA)患者预后或治疗生物标志物的一种辅助手段,但电生理评估可能会给患者带来负担。因此,我们在SMA患者队列中评估了多模式外周非侵入性电生理技术的可行性和耐受性。方法我们进行了一项单中心纵向队列研究,研究了将多模式电生理技术单侧应用于正中神经的可行性和可耐受性。技术包括复合肌肉动作电位扫描、运动神经兴奋性测试、重复神经刺激和感觉神经动作电位。我们使用数字评分量表(NRS)评估了耐受性,范围从0(无疼痛)到10(最严重的疼痛),并定义了如果NRS评分为 ≤ 3.如果该方案能够按照测试和质量标准执行,则该方案被认为是可行的。结果我们纳入了71名1-4型SMA患者(中位数39 年;范围13-67)和63名随访患者。该方案在98%的患者中是可行的,高达90%的患者耐受性良好。中位NRS评分为2(基线时范围为0-6,随访时范围为0-4(p <; 0.01))。没有患者拒绝随访评估。结论应用于正中神经的多模式、外周、非侵入性电生理技术在1-4型SMA青少年和成人中是可行的,并且耐受性良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Feasibility and tolerability of multimodal peripheral electrophysiological techniques in a cohort of patients with spinal muscular atrophy

Objective

Electrophysiological techniques are emerging as an aid in identifying prognostic or therapeutic biomarkers in patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), but electrophysiological assessments may be burdensome for patients. We, therefore, assessed feasibility and tolerability of multimodal peripheral non-invasive electrophysiological techniques in a cohort of patients with SMA.

Methods

We conducted a single center, longitudinal cohort study investigating the feasibility and tolerability of applying multimodal electrophysiological techniques to the median nerve unilaterally. Techniques consisted of the compound muscle action potential scan, motor nerve excitability tests, repetitive nerve stimulation and sensory nerve action potential. We assessed tolerability using the numeric rating scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), and defined the protocol to be tolerable if the NRS score ≤ 3. The protocol was considered feasible if it could be performed according to test and quality standards.

Results

We included 71 patients with SMA types 1–4 (median 39 years; range 13–67) and 63 patients at follow-up. The protocol was feasible in 98% of patients and was well-tolerated in up to 90% of patients. Median NRS score was 2 (range 0–6 at baseline and range 0–4 at follow-up (p < 0.01)). None of the patients declined follow-up assessment.

Conclusions

Multimodal, peripheral, non-invasive, electrophysiological techniques applied to the median nerve are feasible and well-tolerated in adolescents and adults with SMA types 1–4.

Significance

Our study supports the use of non-invasive multimodal electrophysiological assessments in adolescents and adults with SMA types 1–4.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Neurophysiology Practice (CNP) is a new Open Access journal that focuses on clinical practice issues in clinical neurophysiology including relevant new research, case reports or clinical series, normal values and didactic reviews. It is an official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology and complements Clinical Neurophysiology which focuses on innovative research in the specialty. It has a role in supporting established clinical practice, and an educational role for trainees, technicians and practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Primary progressive aphasia with focal periodic sharp wave complexes: An unusual manifestation of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease Effects of sleep deprivation on cortical excitability: A threshold-tracking TMS study and review of the literature The role of clinical neurophysiology in the definition and assessment of fatigue and fatigability Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of MND/ALS: IFCN handbook chapter Clinical neurophysiology of REM parasomnias: Diagnostic aspects and insights into pathophysiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1