多普勒电阻指数在局灶性肝病变鉴别诊断中的价值。

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Ultrasonography Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.15557/jou.2023.0010
Yi Dong, Wen-Ping Wang, Andre Ignee, Dan Zuo, Yi-Jie Qiu, Qi Zhang, Xiu-Yun Lu, Sheng Chen, Christoph Frank Dietrich
{"title":"多普勒电阻指数在局灶性肝病变鉴别诊断中的价值。","authors":"Yi Dong,&nbsp;Wen-Ping Wang,&nbsp;Andre Ignee,&nbsp;Dan Zuo,&nbsp;Yi-Jie Qiu,&nbsp;Qi Zhang,&nbsp;Xiu-Yun Lu,&nbsp;Sheng Chen,&nbsp;Christoph Frank Dietrich","doi":"10.15557/jou.2023.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the diagnostic value of resistance index (RI) in differentiating focal liver lesions.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, a total of 576 patients with histologically confirmed focal liver lesions were included. Each patient underwent B-mode ultrasound examination and color Doppler ultrasound examination. The RI values of different focal liver lesions were recorded and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean RI value of benign lesions was significantly lower than that of malignant lesions (0.54 ± 0.10 <i>vs</i>. 0.71 ± 0.12) (<i>p</i> <0.05). In malignant lesions, the RI value of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was significantly lower than that of hepatocellular carcinoma lesions. Furthermore, in hepatocellular carcinoma lesions, the RI of large lesions (group 4: >10 cm) was significantly lower than that of small lesions (group 1: ≤2 cm, group 2: 2-5 cm) (<i>p</i> <0.05). Taken RI of 0.615 as a cutoff value to differentiate malignant and benign lesions, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 82.80%, 81.00%, 81.34% and 82.48%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Color Doppler ultrasound examination is a valuable imaging method in detecting blood flow signal within liver lesions. The RI parameter should be helpful in differentiating malignant and benign liver tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":45612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasonography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/11/a6/jou-23-93-jou.2023.0010.PMC10379844.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The diagnostic value of Doppler Resistive Index in the differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions.\",\"authors\":\"Yi Dong,&nbsp;Wen-Ping Wang,&nbsp;Andre Ignee,&nbsp;Dan Zuo,&nbsp;Yi-Jie Qiu,&nbsp;Qi Zhang,&nbsp;Xiu-Yun Lu,&nbsp;Sheng Chen,&nbsp;Christoph Frank Dietrich\",\"doi\":\"10.15557/jou.2023.0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the diagnostic value of resistance index (RI) in differentiating focal liver lesions.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, a total of 576 patients with histologically confirmed focal liver lesions were included. Each patient underwent B-mode ultrasound examination and color Doppler ultrasound examination. The RI values of different focal liver lesions were recorded and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean RI value of benign lesions was significantly lower than that of malignant lesions (0.54 ± 0.10 <i>vs</i>. 0.71 ± 0.12) (<i>p</i> <0.05). In malignant lesions, the RI value of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was significantly lower than that of hepatocellular carcinoma lesions. Furthermore, in hepatocellular carcinoma lesions, the RI of large lesions (group 4: >10 cm) was significantly lower than that of small lesions (group 1: ≤2 cm, group 2: 2-5 cm) (<i>p</i> <0.05). Taken RI of 0.615 as a cutoff value to differentiate malignant and benign lesions, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 82.80%, 81.00%, 81.34% and 82.48%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Color Doppler ultrasound examination is a valuable imaging method in detecting blood flow signal within liver lesions. The RI parameter should be helpful in differentiating malignant and benign liver tumors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ultrasonography\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/11/a6/jou-23-93-jou.2023.0010.PMC10379844.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ultrasonography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15557/jou.2023.0010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasonography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15557/jou.2023.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:探讨耐药指数(RI)对肝局灶性病变的诊断价值。患者和方法:本回顾性研究共纳入576例组织学证实的局灶性肝脏病变患者。分别行b超和彩色多普勒超声检查。记录不同局灶性肝病变的RI值并进行比较。结果:良性病变的平均RI值显著低于恶性病变(0.54±0.10 vs 0.71±0.12)(p 10 cm),显著低于小病变(1组≤2 cm, 2组2 ~ 5 cm) (p结论:彩色多普勒超声检查是检测肝脏病变内血流信号的一种有价值的影像学方法。RI参数应有助于鉴别肝肿瘤的良恶性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The diagnostic value of Doppler Resistive Index in the differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions.

Aim: To investigate the diagnostic value of resistance index (RI) in differentiating focal liver lesions.

Patients and methods: In this retrospective study, a total of 576 patients with histologically confirmed focal liver lesions were included. Each patient underwent B-mode ultrasound examination and color Doppler ultrasound examination. The RI values of different focal liver lesions were recorded and compared.

Results: The mean RI value of benign lesions was significantly lower than that of malignant lesions (0.54 ± 0.10 vs. 0.71 ± 0.12) (p <0.05). In malignant lesions, the RI value of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was significantly lower than that of hepatocellular carcinoma lesions. Furthermore, in hepatocellular carcinoma lesions, the RI of large lesions (group 4: >10 cm) was significantly lower than that of small lesions (group 1: ≤2 cm, group 2: 2-5 cm) (p <0.05). Taken RI of 0.615 as a cutoff value to differentiate malignant and benign lesions, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 82.80%, 81.00%, 81.34% and 82.48%, respectively.

Conclusion: Color Doppler ultrasound examination is a valuable imaging method in detecting blood flow signal within liver lesions. The RI parameter should be helpful in differentiating malignant and benign liver tumors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ultrasonography
Journal of Ultrasonography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
The ileocecal valve in transabdominal ultrasound Part 1: Sonographic anatomy and technique Overview for developing Delphi-based interdisciplinary consensus statements on imaging: pros and cons The pattern of renal artery Doppler indices in patients with sickle cell disease Advantages of UltrafastTM ultrasound in the screening for renal artery disease Uterine vascular abnormalities linked to pregnancy complications: color and power Doppler-assisted transvaginal ultrasound evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1