中国医疗责任司法认定的困境与出路。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q1 LAW Medicine, Science and the Law Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1177/00258024231154816
Sunzhe Weng
{"title":"中国医疗责任司法认定的困境与出路。","authors":"Sunzhe Weng","doi":"10.1177/00258024231154816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medical damage liability is directly related to the diagnosis and treatment behavior of medical institutions. It is the most basic form of liability because patients enter the doctor-patient relationship with the expectation that they will receive highly professional medical services from the medical institution. This paper outlines the features of the development of China's medical damage liability system, points out the problems of the system in practice, and proposes improvements. It explores how to solve the legal dilemma of identifying medical liability in China from three perspectives: perfecting the formation and adoption procedures of expert opinions, standardizing the identification of fault by medical institutions, and standardizing the application of the rules of reducing liability for the cause.</p>","PeriodicalId":18484,"journal":{"name":"Medicine, Science and the Law","volume":"63 3","pages":"237-242"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The dilemma and outlet of judicial determination of medical liability in China.\",\"authors\":\"Sunzhe Weng\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00258024231154816\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Medical damage liability is directly related to the diagnosis and treatment behavior of medical institutions. It is the most basic form of liability because patients enter the doctor-patient relationship with the expectation that they will receive highly professional medical services from the medical institution. This paper outlines the features of the development of China's medical damage liability system, points out the problems of the system in practice, and proposes improvements. It explores how to solve the legal dilemma of identifying medical liability in China from three perspectives: perfecting the formation and adoption procedures of expert opinions, standardizing the identification of fault by medical institutions, and standardizing the application of the rules of reducing liability for the cause.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine, Science and the Law\",\"volume\":\"63 3\",\"pages\":\"237-242\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine, Science and the Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00258024231154816\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine, Science and the Law","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00258024231154816","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医疗损害责任直接关系到医疗机构的诊疗行为。这是最基本的责任形式,因为患者在建立医患关系时期望从医疗机构获得高度专业的医疗服务。本文概述了中国医疗损害赔偿责任制度发展的特点,指出了该制度在实践中存在的问题,并提出了改进建议。从完善专家意见的形成和采纳程序、规范医疗机构的过错认定、规范事由减轻责任规则的适用三个方面探讨如何解决中国医疗责任认定的法律困境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The dilemma and outlet of judicial determination of medical liability in China.

Medical damage liability is directly related to the diagnosis and treatment behavior of medical institutions. It is the most basic form of liability because patients enter the doctor-patient relationship with the expectation that they will receive highly professional medical services from the medical institution. This paper outlines the features of the development of China's medical damage liability system, points out the problems of the system in practice, and proposes improvements. It explores how to solve the legal dilemma of identifying medical liability in China from three perspectives: perfecting the formation and adoption procedures of expert opinions, standardizing the identification of fault by medical institutions, and standardizing the application of the rules of reducing liability for the cause.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicine, Science and the Law
Medicine, Science and the Law 医学-医学:法
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
53
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine, Science and the Law is the official journal of the British Academy for Forensic Sciences (BAFS). It is a peer reviewed journal dedicated to advancing the knowledge of forensic science and medicine. The journal aims to inform its readers from a broad perspective and demonstrate the interrelated nature and scope of the forensic disciplines. Through a variety of authoritative research articles submitted from across the globe, it covers a range of topical medico-legal issues. The journal keeps its readers informed of developments and trends through reporting, discussing and debating current issues of importance in forensic practice.
期刊最新文献
Eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR) within prisons and the criminal justice system. A case of Sudden Cardiac Death with myocardial infarction due to iatrogenic coronary dissection in a patient with coronary vasospasm. Correction of a statistical error: The data does not show Letby's presence at the baby deaths could have occurred by chance. Parricide and homicide NGRI offenders: How do they differ? Features of fatal pesticide ingestion in South Australia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1