MELD评分和SII联合应用在实体肿瘤患者肝脏器危象中的预后重要性。

Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.29271/jcpsp.2023.08.879
Fatih Tay, Mustafa Buyukkor, Ayse Ocak Duran
{"title":"MELD评分和SII联合应用在实体肿瘤患者肝脏器危象中的预后重要性。","authors":"Fatih Tay,&nbsp;Mustafa Buyukkor,&nbsp;Ayse Ocak Duran","doi":"10.29271/jcpsp.2023.08.879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the sensitivity of combining the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scoring with new inflammatory indexes in determining the priority for liver transplantation and demonstrating its potential usability in solid tumour visceral crisis.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Descriptive study. Place and Duration of the Study: Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkiye, from June 2017 to June 2022.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong> Patients hospitalised in the medical oncology clinic for hepatic dysfunction were included. The MELD scores of these patients were calculated, and the predictive contribution of the systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII) to prognosis and mortality was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 295 patients (158 (53.6%) men and 137 (46.4%) women) were included. When compared for primary tumour types, colorectal cancers were the most common with 55 (18.6%) cases, followed by breast cancers at 52 (17.6%), pancreatic carcinoma at 50 (16.9%), and stomach cancers at 40 (13.6%) cases. In the survival analyses of all three MELD scores (MELD-Original, MELD-Na, and MELD 3.0) between <20 groups and ≥20 groups, the median Overall Survival (OS) for MELD-Original was 1.44 vs. 0.88 months (p<0.001), for MELD- Na it was 1.64 vs. 0.85 months (p<0.001), and for MELD 3.0 it was 2.16 vs. 1.28 months (p=0.039). In the ROC analysis, the SII parameter cut-off was ≥626.28 for the estimation of mortality, SII sensitivity was 78.7%, and specificity was 100% (p=0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combined use of MELD and SII scores in patients with solid tumours with hepatic visceral crises will be practical, cost-effective, and easy to access, eliminate gender-based disparities, and contribute to clinical follow-ups with objective data.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Malignant neoplasm, MELD score, MELD-Na, MELD 3.0, SII.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"33 8","pages":"879-883"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic Importance of Combined Use of MELD Scores and SII in Hepatic Visceral Crisis in Patients with Solid Tumours.\",\"authors\":\"Fatih Tay,&nbsp;Mustafa Buyukkor,&nbsp;Ayse Ocak Duran\",\"doi\":\"10.29271/jcpsp.2023.08.879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the sensitivity of combining the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scoring with new inflammatory indexes in determining the priority for liver transplantation and demonstrating its potential usability in solid tumour visceral crisis.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Descriptive study. Place and Duration of the Study: Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkiye, from June 2017 to June 2022.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong> Patients hospitalised in the medical oncology clinic for hepatic dysfunction were included. The MELD scores of these patients were calculated, and the predictive contribution of the systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII) to prognosis and mortality was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 295 patients (158 (53.6%) men and 137 (46.4%) women) were included. When compared for primary tumour types, colorectal cancers were the most common with 55 (18.6%) cases, followed by breast cancers at 52 (17.6%), pancreatic carcinoma at 50 (16.9%), and stomach cancers at 40 (13.6%) cases. In the survival analyses of all three MELD scores (MELD-Original, MELD-Na, and MELD 3.0) between <20 groups and ≥20 groups, the median Overall Survival (OS) for MELD-Original was 1.44 vs. 0.88 months (p<0.001), for MELD- Na it was 1.64 vs. 0.85 months (p<0.001), and for MELD 3.0 it was 2.16 vs. 1.28 months (p=0.039). In the ROC analysis, the SII parameter cut-off was ≥626.28 for the estimation of mortality, SII sensitivity was 78.7%, and specificity was 100% (p=0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combined use of MELD and SII scores in patients with solid tumours with hepatic visceral crises will be practical, cost-effective, and easy to access, eliminate gender-based disparities, and contribute to clinical follow-ups with objective data.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Malignant neoplasm, MELD score, MELD-Na, MELD 3.0, SII.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":\"33 8\",\"pages\":\"879-883\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2023.08.879\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2023.08.879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:探讨终末期肝病(MELD)评分模型与新的炎症指标相结合在确定肝移植优先级中的敏感性,并证明其在实体瘤脏器危像中的潜在可用性。研究设计:描述性研究。研究地点和时间:Abdurrahman Yurtaslan肿瘤培训和研究医院,土耳其安卡拉,2017年6月至2022年6月。方法:纳入因肝功能障碍住院的肿瘤内科门诊患者。计算这些患者的MELD评分,并评估全身免疫炎症指数(SII)对预后和死亡率的预测作用。结果:共纳入295例患者,其中男性158例(53.6%),女性137例(46.4%)。当比较原发性肿瘤类型时,结直肠癌最常见,有55例(18.6%),其次是乳腺癌52例(17.6%),胰腺癌50例(16.9%),胃癌40例(13.6%)。在MELD- original, MELD- na和MELD 3.0之间的所有三个MELD评分的生存分析中,结论:MELD和SII评分在合并肝脏器危像的实体瘤患者中联合使用将是实用的,具有成本效益,易于获取,消除了基于性别的差异,并有助于客观数据的临床随访。关键词:恶性肿瘤,MELD评分,MELD- na, MELD 3.0, SII
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Prognostic Importance of Combined Use of MELD Scores and SII in Hepatic Visceral Crisis in Patients with Solid Tumours.

Objective: To determine the sensitivity of combining the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scoring with new inflammatory indexes in determining the priority for liver transplantation and demonstrating its potential usability in solid tumour visceral crisis.

Study design: Descriptive study. Place and Duration of the Study: Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkiye, from June 2017 to June 2022.

Methodology:  Patients hospitalised in the medical oncology clinic for hepatic dysfunction were included. The MELD scores of these patients were calculated, and the predictive contribution of the systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII) to prognosis and mortality was evaluated.

Results: A total of 295 patients (158 (53.6%) men and 137 (46.4%) women) were included. When compared for primary tumour types, colorectal cancers were the most common with 55 (18.6%) cases, followed by breast cancers at 52 (17.6%), pancreatic carcinoma at 50 (16.9%), and stomach cancers at 40 (13.6%) cases. In the survival analyses of all three MELD scores (MELD-Original, MELD-Na, and MELD 3.0) between <20 groups and ≥20 groups, the median Overall Survival (OS) for MELD-Original was 1.44 vs. 0.88 months (p<0.001), for MELD- Na it was 1.64 vs. 0.85 months (p<0.001), and for MELD 3.0 it was 2.16 vs. 1.28 months (p=0.039). In the ROC analysis, the SII parameter cut-off was ≥626.28 for the estimation of mortality, SII sensitivity was 78.7%, and specificity was 100% (p=0.013).

Conclusion: Combined use of MELD and SII scores in patients with solid tumours with hepatic visceral crises will be practical, cost-effective, and easy to access, eliminate gender-based disparities, and contribute to clinical follow-ups with objective data.

Key words: Malignant neoplasm, MELD score, MELD-Na, MELD 3.0, SII.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1